Structure-based specificity mapping of secreted aspartic proteases of Candida parapsilosis, Candida albicans, and Candida tropicalis using peptidomimetic inhibitors and homology modeling
Language English Country Germany Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
16972793
DOI
10.1515/bc.2006.154
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases chemistry drug effects MeSH
- Candida enzymology MeSH
- Protease Inhibitors chemical synthesis chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Isoenzymes chemistry drug effects MeSH
- Molecular Conformation MeSH
- Models, Molecular * MeSH
- Molecular Sequence Data MeSH
- Amino Acid Sequence MeSH
- Sequence Homology, Amino Acid MeSH
- Stereoisomerism MeSH
- Substrate Specificity MeSH
- Protein Structure, Tertiary MeSH
- Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Aspartic Acid Endopeptidases MeSH
- Protease Inhibitors MeSH
- Isoenzymes MeSH
Secreted aspartic proteases (Saps) of pathogenic Candida spp. represent a specific target for antifungal drug development. We synthesized a series of peptidomimetic inhibitors with different isosteric groups and modifications at individual positions and tested them with purified Saps from C. albicans (Sap2p), C. tropicalis (Sapt1p), and C. parapsilosis (Sapp1p). The kinetic parameters indicated that all three proteases prefer binding of inhibitors containing bulky hydrophobic residues between positions P3 and P3'. The most divergent specificity was found for Sapp1p. The sequence alignment of Sap2p, Sapt1p, and Sapp1p, and homology modeling of Sapp1p with the crystal structure of Sapt1p and the complex of Sap2p with a peptidomimetic inhibitor showed that the overall folds of Sap2p, Sapt1p, and Sapp1p are similar. However, the N- and C-terminal loops formed by disulfide bonds between residues 47-53 and 258-292 are significantly shorter in Sapp1p, and a unique insertion following Tyr 129 in Sapp1p results in the formation of a loop that can interact with inhibitor residues. These Sapp1p structural differences might lead to its altered susceptibility to inhibition.
References provided by Crossref.org