Effect of environmental factors on biofilm formation by clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17571802
DOI
10.1007/bf02932144
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aerobióza MeSH
- anaerobióza MeSH
- biofilmy růst a vývoj MeSH
- gramnegativní bakteriální infekce mikrobiologie MeSH
- koncentrace vodíkových iontů MeSH
- kultivační média MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- regulace genové exprese u bakterií * MeSH
- Stenotrophomonas maltophilia růst a vývoj izolace a purifikace MeSH
- teplota * MeSH
- životní prostředí * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kultivační média MeSH
The influence of environmental factors (temperature, aerobiosis-anaerobiosis, static-dynamic conditions, pH) was determined on biofilm formation by 51 S. maltophilia clinical isolates. The strains produced more biofilm at 32 degrees C than at 37 or 18 degrees C. Aerobic and 6% CO2 atmosphere yielded comparable biofilm amounts, higher than under anaerobic conditions. Biofilm production was not affected by static vs. agitated culture conditions. Biofilm production at pH 7.5 and 8.5 was comparable but significantly higher than at pH 5.5. The capacity of individual strains to form biofilm and thus contribute to the severity of some diseases is influenced by host traits and environmental conditions at the site of infection, and play an important role in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-related disease caused by S. maltophilia.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Am J Infect Control. 1996 Oct;24(5):389-95 PubMed
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jan;48(1):151-60 PubMed
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003 Nov;9(6):486-91 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 1997 Feb 15;99(4):565-9 PubMed
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Oct;43(2):85-100 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 15;34(12):1653-6 PubMed
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;15(11):691-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(5):596-600 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Dec;56(12):3766-71 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(2):99-102 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):57-80 PubMed
Microbiol Immunol. 2001;45(8):563-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(5):381-6 PubMed
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2000 Dec;2(6):490-496 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1996 Sep;178(18):5472-9 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Sep;9(9):955-8 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(1):75-8 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 2005 Aug;51(2):100-4 PubMed
Crit Care. 2000;4(1):6-14 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 2002 Feb;109(3):317-25 PubMed
Science. 1999 May 21;284(5418):1318-22 PubMed
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;20(7):502-4 PubMed
Temperature and pH affect the production of bacterial biofilm
Antibiotic resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains isolated from captive snakes
Bacterial biofilms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis