Erwinia amylovora [(BURRILL) WINSLOW et al.] (Ea), the causal agent of fire blight, was detected in plant samples and pure bacterial cultures by means of PCR, IFAS and ELISA. Polyclonal antibodies of Neogen Europe Ltd. were used for IFAS and PTA-ELISA and laboratory-generated primers EaF72 and EaR560 for PCR. Using the BIOLOG system and an immature pear fruit assay, identities of all Ea strains were confirmed as the fire blight bacterium. In assays of pure Ea cultures, PTA-ELISA, and both IFAS and PCR were sensitive to concentrations 10(6)-10(5) and 10(5)-10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. When saprophytic bacteria associated with Ea in plant samples were tested as potentially cross-reacting bacteria, PTA-ELISA and IFAS gave 20 and 14 % cross-reactions, respectively. In plant samples, the presence of Ea was more reliably detected by IFAS (at a dilution of 1 : 1000) than by PTA-ELISA (to dilution 1 : 100). The capacity to detect Ea might be increased using an optimized PCR, but for PCR prepared from infected plant samples it was necessary to use the bacterial DNA isolated with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). In this case the PCR was sensitive to a concentration of 10(5) CFU/mL. PCR was much more specific than either immunochemical technique, because no false positives were observed when primers EaF72 and EaR560 were used.

Department of Bacteriology Plant Medicine Division Research Institute of Crop Production 161 06 Prague Czechia

See more in PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2798-802 PubMed

Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;4(2):106-14 PubMed

Plant Dis. 1998 Jun;82(6):646-650 PubMed

Plant Dis. 1998 Feb;82(2):158-164 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(3):217-21 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jul;61(7):2636-42 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Nov;58(11):3522-6 PubMed

Comparison of specificity and sensitivity of immunochemical and molecular techniques for determination of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis