Differences in osmotolerant and cell-wall properties of two Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strains
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
17702462
DOI
10.1007/bf02931305
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Antifungal Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Cell Wall physiology ultrastructure MeSH
- Glucan Endo-1,3-beta-D-Glucosidase pharmacology MeSH
- Adaptation, Physiological MeSH
- Saline Solution, Hypertonic metabolism MeSH
- Multienzyme Complexes pharmacology MeSH
- Osmolar Concentration MeSH
- Peptide Hydrolases pharmacology MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae physiology MeSH
- Zygosaccharomyces cytology physiology MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antifungal Agents MeSH
- Glucan Endo-1,3-beta-D-Glucosidase MeSH
- Saline Solution, Hypertonic MeSH
- lyticase MeSH Browser
- Multienzyme Complexes MeSH
- Peptide Hydrolases MeSH
The osmotolerant and cell wall properties of the two most studied wild-type Zygosaccharomyces rouxii strains (CBS 732 and ATCC 42981) were examined. Differences in their (1) tolerance to high salt content in the medium, (2) resistance to the lysing enzymes Lyticase and Zymolyase, (3) cell-wall polymer content and (4) cell wall micromorphology suggested that the less osmotolerant CBS 732 strain possesses a more rigid cell wall than the more osmotolerant ATCC 42981, whose cell wall seems to be more flexible and elastic.
See more in PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 1999 Jan;145 ( Pt 1):241-248 PubMed
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Jun;66(2):300-72 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2003 May;149(Pt 5):1193-1204 PubMed
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Dec;62(4):1264-300 PubMed
Nature. 1964 Apr 25;202:364-6 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 2000 Dec 22;487(1):52-5 PubMed
Yeast. 2006 Feb;23(3):185-202 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Nov;55(2):481-4 PubMed
J Biotechnol. 2001 Jun 15;88(2):151-8 PubMed
Eukaryot Cell. 2006 Feb;5(2):347-58 PubMed
Yeast. 2007 Mar;24(3):171-80 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(4):469-78 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163-8 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002 Aug;26(3):239-56 PubMed
