Karyotypic relationships among Equus grevyi, Equus burchelli and domestic horse defined using horse chromosome arm-specific probes
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- chromozomy ultrastruktura MeSH
- DNA sondy chemie MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- Equidae MeSH
- hybridizace nukleových kyselin MeSH
- karyotypizace MeSH
- koně MeSH
- malování chromozomů MeSH
- mapování chromozomů MeSH
- metafáze MeSH
- modely genetické MeSH
- pruhování chromozomů MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA sondy MeSH
Using laser microdissection we prepared a set of horse chromosome arm-specific probes. Most of the probes were generated from horse chromosomes, some of them were derived from Equus zebra hartmannae. The set of probes were hybridized onto E. grevyi chromosomes in order to establish a genome-wide chromosomal correspondence between this zebra and horse. The use of arm-specific probes provided us with more information on the mutual arrangement of the genomes than we could obtain by means of whole-chromosome paints generated by flow sorting, even if we used reciprocal painting with probe sets from both species. By comparison of our results and results of comparative mapping in E. burchelli, we also established the chromosomal correspondence between E. grevyi and E. burchelli, providing evidence for a very close karyotypic relationship between these two zebra species. Establishment of the comparative map for E. grevyi contributes to the knowledge of the karyotypic phylogeny in the Equidae family.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Mamm Genome. 1998 Jan;9(1):44-9 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;93(3-4):291-6 PubMed
Mamm Genome. 1996 Oct;7(10):717-34 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;116(4):263-8 PubMed
Nat Genet. 1992 Apr;1(1):24-8 PubMed
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 1992 Apr;4(3):257-63 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1978;20(1-6):332-50 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2003;102(1-4):235-43 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2002;10(7):571-7 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1997 Nov;5(7):433-43 PubMed
Genet Sel Evol. 2003 Nov-Dec;35(6):685-96 PubMed
Lancet. 1971 Oct 30;2(7731):971-2 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Nov;3(6):535-46 PubMed
Int J Mol Med. 2003 Aug;12(2):139-46 PubMed
Nat Genet. 1994 Apr;6(4):342-7 PubMed
Genomics. 1996 Sep 1;36(2):252-62 PubMed
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2001;93(3-4):242-8 PubMed
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004 Dec;14(6):657-66 PubMed
Genome Res. 1998 Jun;8(6):577-89 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;112(1-2):67-75 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 2004;12(1):65-76 PubMed
Genomics. 2007 Jan;89(1):89-112 PubMed
Mamm Genome. 2005 Aug;16(8):631-49 PubMed
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(2):103-14 PubMed
Genomics. 1993 Oct;18(1):113-7 PubMed
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2003;103(1-2):104-10 PubMed
Genomics. 2006 Jun;87(6):777-82 PubMed
Biotechniques. 1999 Aug;27(2):362-7 PubMed
Illegitimate recombination between T cell receptor genes in humans and pigs (Sus scrofa domestica)
Subchromosomal karyotype evolution in Equidae