Does the mechanism of sex determination constrain the potential for sex manipulation? A test in geckos with contrasting sex-determining systems
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Lizards classification physiology MeSH
- Ovum physiology MeSH
- Sex Ratio MeSH
- Sex Determination Processes * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The concentration of yolk steroids was suggested to influence offspring gender in oviparous animals subject to both temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) and genotypic sex determination (GSD). However, the proposed mechanisms of steroid effects are thought to differ between TSD and GSD: a direct effect of oestrogens on gonad feminisation in TSD species vs a differential induction of male-producing or female-producing gametes in GSD species. Geckos offer an ideal opportunity for testing these suggested mechanisms. Closely related gecko species differ in their modes of sex determination. They lay clutches of two synchronously formed eggs; both eggs share equal steroid levels. If identical hormonal composition and environment during vitellogenesis, gravidity and incubation determine the sex of the progeny, siblings should share the same gender in both TSD and GSD geckos. We found strong support for this prediction in a TSD gecko species. Among clutches that were incubated at the temperature that produced both sexes, there were no clutches with siblings of the opposite sex. On the other hand, about half of the clutches yielded siblings of the opposite sex in four GSD species. These results suggest that sex-determining systems constrain the ability of the female to produce single-sex siblings and, hence, it seems that the GSD mechanism constrains the opportunities for sex ratio manipulation in geckos via yolk steroid manipulation.
See more in PubMed
Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):676-83 PubMed
J Exp Biol. 2002 Sep;205(Pt 18):2777-84 PubMed
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2003 Feb 1;295(2):206-10 PubMed
Evolution. 2005 Jun;59(6):1211-28 PubMed
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):553-74 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 7;267(1454):1745-9 PubMed
J Evol Biol. 2006 Nov;19(6):1819-29 PubMed
J Evol Biol. 2005 Nov;18(6):1455-63 PubMed
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002 Jun 1;127(1):26-33 PubMed
J Exp Zool. 1993 May 1;265(6):679-83 PubMed
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1997 Aug;107(2):191-200 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1277-82 PubMed
Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90-2 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 22;272(1559):173-7 PubMed
Evolution. 2005 Oct;59(10):2209-21 PubMed
Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):498-9 PubMed
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2007 Mar-Apr;80(2):220-7 PubMed
Bioessays. 2004 Jun;26(6):639-45 PubMed
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2000 May;118(2):322-31 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 22;272(1565):859-64 PubMed
J Endocrinol. 2004 Jun;181(3):367-77 PubMed
Evolution. 1998 Oct;52(5):1514-1520 PubMed
Science. 2002 Mar 1;295(5560):1685-8 PubMed
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003 Nov;134(2):109-15 PubMed
Biol Lett. 2005 Sep 22;1(3):318-21 PubMed
J Exp Zool. 2002 Jun 15;293(1):58-66 PubMed
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003 Jul;132(3):349-55 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2001 Apr;10(4):1011-24 PubMed
Environmental (and Random?) Sex Determination in Endangered and Invasive Phelsuma Geckos
