Identifying stabilizing key residues in proteins using interresidue interaction energy matrix
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
18214960
DOI
10.1002/prot.21938
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Amino Acids chemistry MeSH
- Models, Chemical MeSH
- Molecular Sequence Data MeSH
- Mutant Proteins chemistry MeSH
- Peptides chemistry MeSH
- Gases MeSH
- Proteins chemistry MeSH
- Solvents MeSH
- Rubredoxins chemistry MeSH
- Amino Acid Sequence MeSH
- Thermodynamics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Amino Acids MeSH
- Mutant Proteins MeSH
- Peptides MeSH
- Gases MeSH
- Proteins MeSH
- Solvents MeSH
- Rubredoxins MeSH
- Trp-cage peptide MeSH Browser
We are proposing an interresidue interaction energy map (IEM)--a new tool for protein structure analysis and protein bioinformatics. This approach employs the sum of pair-wise interaction energies of a particular residue as a measure of its structural importance. We will show that the IEM can serve as a means for identifying key residues responsible for the stability of a protein. Our method can be compared with the interresidue contact map but has the advantage of weighting the contacts by the stabilization energy content which they bring to the protein structure. For the theoretical adjustment of the proposed method, we chose the Trp-cage mini protein as a model system to compare a spectrum of computational methods ranging from the ab initio MP2 level through the DFT method to empirical force-field methods. The IEM method correctly identifies Tryptophane 6 as the key residue in the Trp-cage. The other residues with the highest stabilizing contributions correspond to the structurally important positions in the protein. We have further tested our method on the Trp2Cage miniprotein--a P12W mutant of the Trp-cage and on two proteins from the rubredoxin family that differ in their thermostability. Our method correctly identified the thermodynamically more stable variants in both cases and therefore can also be used as a tool for the relative measurement of protein stability. Finally, we will point out the important role played by dispersion energy, which contributes significantly to the total stabilization energy and whose role in aromatic pairs is clearly dominant. Surprisingly, the dispersion energy plays an even more important role in the interaction of prolines with aromatic systems.
References provided by Crossref.org
Amino Acid Interaction (INTAA) web server