BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: Pollution-induced endocrine disruption in vertebrates and invertebrates is a worldwide environmental problem, but relatively little is known about effects of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in planktonic crustaceans (including Daphnia magna). Aims of the present study were to investigate acute 48 h toxicity and sub-chronic (4-6 days) and chronic (21 days) effects of selected EDCs in D. magna. We have investigated both traditional endpoints as well as other parameters such as sex determination, maturation, molting or embryogenesis in order to evaluate the sensitivity and possible use of these endpoints in ecological risk assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have studied effects of four model EDCs (vinclozolin, flutamide, ketoconazole and dicofol) on D. magna using (i) an acute 48 h immobilization assay, (ii) a sub-chronic, 4-6 day assay evaluating development and the sex ratio of neonates, and (iii) a chronic, 21 day assay studying number of neonates, sex of neonates, molting frequency, day of maturation and the growth of maternal organisms. RESULTS: Acute EC50 values in the 48 h immobilization test were as follows (mg/L): dicofol 0.2, ketoconazole 1.5, flutamide 2.7, vinclozolin >3. Short-term, 4-6 day assays with sublethal concentrations showed that the sex ratio in Daphnia was modulated by vinclozolin (decreased number of neonate males at 1 mg/L) and dicofol (increase in males at 0.1 mg/L). Flutamide (up to 1 mg/L) had no effect on the sex of neonates, but inhibited embryonic development at certain stages during chronic assay, resulting in abortions. Ketoconazole had no significant effects on the studied processes up to 1 mg/L. DISCUSSION: Sex ratio modulations by some chemicals (vinclozolin and dicofol) corresponded to the known action of these compounds in vertebrates (i.e. anti-androgenicity and anti-oestrogenicity, respectively). Our study revealed that some chemicals known to affect steroid-regulated processes in vertebrates can also affect sublethal endpoints (e.g. embryonic sex determination and/or reproduction) in invertebrates such as D. magna. CONCLUSIONS: A series of model vertebrate endocrine disrupters affected various sub-chronic and chronic parameters in D. magna including several endpoints that have not been previously studied in detail (such as sex determination in neonates, embryogenesis, molting and maturation). Evaluations of traditional reproduction parameters (obtained from the 21 day chronic assay). as well as the results from a rapid, 4-6 day, sub-chronic assay provide complementary information on non-lethal effects of suspected organic endocrine disrupters. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: It seems that there are analogies between vertebrates and invertebrates in toxicity mechanisms and in vivo effects of endocrine disruptors. However, general physiological status of organisms may also indirectly affect endpoints that are traditionally considered 'hormone regulated' (especially at higher effective concentrations as observed in this study) and these factors should be carefully considered. Further research of D. magna physiology and comparative studies with various EDCs will help to understand mechanisms of action as well as ecological risks of EDCs in the environment.

RECETOX Research Centre for Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology Masaryk University Kamenice 3 62500 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ecotoxicology. 2007 Feb;16(1):61-81 PubMed

Toxicol In Vitro. 2000 Jun;14(3):227-34 PubMed

Ecotoxicology. 2007 Feb;16(1):131-43 PubMed

J Exp Zool. 2002 Dec 1;293(7):736-9 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1998 Feb;39(2):104-11 PubMed

Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 Suppl 1):16-23 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jun;111(7):919-24 PubMed

Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;125(2):135-56 PubMed

Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Jan;137(1):53-63 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1999 May;43(1):103-10 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Sep;13(5):308-19 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2006 Jun;63(9):1477-84 PubMed

Aquat Toxicol. 2000 Mar 1;48(2-3):195-209 PubMed

Annu Rev Entomol. 1993;38:161-80 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Dec;20(12):2821-9 PubMed

Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1984 Feb;105(2):275-80 PubMed

Environ Health Perspect. 1995 May;103 Suppl 4:7-11 PubMed

Biol Reprod. 1999 Oct;61(4):1152-61 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Dec;61(8):1168-74 PubMed

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1997 Dec;38(3):281-5 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Mar;20(3):582-8 PubMed

Ecotoxicology. 2001 Dec;10(6):373-88 PubMed

Aquat Toxicol. 2005 Sep 10;74(3):193-204 PubMed

Toxicol Sci. 2001 Aug;62(2):268-73 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1999;6(1):44-8 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 May;23(5):1282-8 PubMed

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Mar;20(3):502-9 PubMed

Toxicology. 2004 Jul 15;200(1):77-89 PubMed

J Androl. 1992 May-Jun;13(3):191-8 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Jun;60(1):74-8 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2003 Dec;53(8):827-33 PubMed

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 1997;4(3):155-62 PubMed

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994 Jun;126(2):276-85 PubMed

Crit Rev Toxicol. 1998 Jul;28(4):319-61 PubMed

Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Jan-Mar;15(1-2):94-118 PubMed

Aquat Toxicol. 2002 Mar;56(4):227-39 PubMed