For somatic cell nuclear transfer cytoplasts from metaphase II, oocytes are exclusively used. However, it is evident that certain reprogramming activities are present in oocytes even at earlier stages of maturation. These activities are, however, only poorly characterised. The main reason for this is that even the intrinsic oocyte processes are insufficiently understood. The mammalian oocyte is a highly specialised cell that harbours many specific characteristics. One of these is its particularly large size when compared to somatic cells. As the oocyte enters the growth phase its volume, as well as the amount of material, increases considerably. Thus, it is clear that the oocyte must possess the machinery to accomplish this incredible material accumulation. When the growth phase is completed, the transcription ceases and the oocyte becomes transcriptionally inactive. In our study, we have used the model system of oocyte fusion (transcribing x non-transcribing germinal vesicle (GV) stage oocytes) as a substitute for a somatic cell nuclear transfer schemes where the somatic cell nucleus would be introduced into a cytoplast obtained from a GV stage oocyte. We wanted to determine if the fully grown GV stage oocyte could induce reprogramming of transcriptionally active transferred nucleus by suppressing this activity. In order to evaluate possible changes in transcriptional properties after nuclear transfer, we also investigated the mechanism of transcriptional silencing taking place when the oocyte reaches its full size as well as the fate of the components namely of the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcriptional and splicing machinery. Here, we show that while the Pol II is degraded in fully grown GV stage oocytes and the splicing proteins undergo significant rearrangement, these oocytes are unable to induce similar changes in transcriptionally active nuclei even after a prolonged culture interval.

The Institute of Animal Science Pratelstvi 815 10400 Prague 10 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Struct Biol. 2002 Oct-Dec;140(1-3):154-66 PubMed

Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51(4):283-95 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 2003 Apr;64(4):458-70 PubMed

J Reprod Dev. 2007 Feb;53(1):13-26 PubMed

Development. 2008 Dec;135(23):3935-45 PubMed

Fertil Steril. 2004 Aug;82(2):486-7 PubMed

J Reprod Fertil. 1984 Nov;72(2):323-8 PubMed

Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Feb 3;340(1):183-9 PubMed

Dev Biol. 2001 Jan 1;229(1):224-36 PubMed

Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Aug;4(8):605-12 PubMed

Genes Dev. 2000 Oct 1;14(19):2452-60 PubMed

Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Apr;17(4):1723-33 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 2005 Aug;71(4):509-15 PubMed

Dev Biol. 2006 Apr 1;292(1):1-12 PubMed

Genes Dev. 2001 Dec 15;15(24):3319-29 PubMed

Genes Dev. 1998 Mar 1;12(5):599-606 PubMed

Dev Biol. 1976 Jun;50(2):531-6 PubMed

Biol Reprod. 2004 Oct;71(4):1330-9 PubMed

Dev Biol. 1997 Jan 15;181(2):296-307 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Aug;75(8):1269-80 PubMed

Curr Biol. 2003 Jul 15;13(14):1206-13 PubMed

Cell Res. 2007 Feb;17(2):117-34 PubMed

Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 May;11(5):394-403 PubMed

Trends Cell Biol. 2006 Jan;16(1):19-26 PubMed

Biol Reprod. 1999 Mar;60(3):580-7 PubMed

Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1998 Oct 25;145(1-2):27-37 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 1993 Sep;36(1):59-74 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 Mar;75(3):556-64 PubMed

J Cell Biochem. 2000 Apr;77(4):654-65 PubMed

Genes Dev. 2005 Jun 15;19(12):1401-15 PubMed

Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):613-6 PubMed

Reproduction. 2005 Dec;130(6):791-9 PubMed

Dev Biol. 2004 Nov 15;275(2):447-58 PubMed

Mol Reprod Dev. 1990 Dec;27(4):366-75 PubMed

Nucleus reprogramming/remodeling through selective enucleation (SE) of immature oocytes and zygotes: a nucleolus point of view

Dissecting the role of the germinal vesicle nuclear envelope and soluble content in the process of somatic cell remodelling and reprogramming