Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection
Language English Country Ireland Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
19671492
DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.010
PII: S0720-048X(09)00415-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Algorithms * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Contrast Media MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography methods MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Renal Artery Obstruction diagnosis MeSH
- Organometallic Compounds * MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Image Enhancement methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- gadobutrol MeSH Browser
- Contrast Media MeSH
- Organometallic Compounds * MeSH
Significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a potentially curable cause of renovascular hypertension and/or renal impairment. It is caused by either atherosclerosis or fibromuscular dysplasia. Correct and timely diagnosis remains a diagnostic challenge. MR angiography (MRA) as a minimally invasive method seems to be suitable for RAS detection, however, its diagnostic value widely differs in the literature (sensitivity 62-100% and specificity 75-100%). The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced MRA utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in the detection of significant RAS with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A total of 78 hypertensive subjects with suspected renal artery stenosis were examined on a 1.5 Tesla MR system using a body array coil. Bolus tracking was used to monitor the arrival of contrast agent to the abdominal aorta. The MRA sequence parameters were as follows: TR 3.7 ms; TE 1.2 ms; flip angle 25 degrees; acquisition time 18s; voxel size 1.1 mm x1.0 mm x 1.1 mm; centric k-space sampling; parallel acquisition technique with acceleration factor of 2 (GRAPPA). Renal artery stenosis of 60% and more was considered hemodynamically significant. The results of MRA were compared to digital subtraction angiography serving as a standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity of MRA in the detection of hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis were 90% and 96%, respectively. Prevalence of RAS was 39% in our study population. Contrast-enhanced MRA with high spatial resolution offers sufficient sensitivity and specificity for screening of RAS.
References provided by Crossref.org