Diagnostic accuracy of postnatal ultrasound screening for urinary tract abnormalities

. 2010 Feb ; 25 (2) : 281-7. [epub] 20091024

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid19856001

The study was aimed at (1) the determination of the incidence of abnormalities of the urinary tract in newborn infants detected by postnatal ultrasound screening, and (2) the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of postnatal ultrasound screening for detecting surgical urinary tract abnormalities. The prospective study was of full-term neonates born in the University Hospital of Olomouc in 2005-2008 who underwent renal ultrasound screening after 72 h of life. Significant findings were recorded. Subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were recorded and evaluated in a group of children with detected renal pelvic dilatation (RPD). (1) A total of 6,088 newborn infants was examined. The absolute and relative RPD incidence rates (anteroposterior diameter, APD) were as follows: 5-7 mm, 146 (2.4%); 7-10 mm, 70 (1.15%); 10-15 mm, 13 (0.21%), and 15 mm or more, 5 (0.08%). Of those, 16 children were operated on for abnormalities of the urinary tract, of which nine (56%) had been detected by prenatal screening. Other findings: six cases of unilateral renal agenesis, four cases of multicystic renal dysplasia, four of renal dystopia, one of polycystic kidney disease and one of renal hypoplasia. (2) A group of 224 children with postnatally detected RPD was examined, of whom 40 (17.9%) underwent voiding cystourethrography and/or scintigraphy and 16 (7.1%) were treated surgically. The receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed, and the areas under the curves were calculated. Postnatal renal ultrasound screening is probably a suitable test for detecting significant urinary tract abnormalities.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):242-6 PubMed

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Apr;164(4):963-7 PubMed

Pediatr Int. 2003 Oct;45(5):617-23 PubMed

Arch Dis Child. 1997 Jan;76(1):31-4 PubMed

Pediatr Int. 2003 Apr;45(2):142-9 PubMed

Pediatr Nephrol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1727-34 PubMed

Pediatr Nephrol. 2005 Sep;20(9):1253-9 PubMed

J Pediatr. 2004 Jun;144(6):759-65 PubMed

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194(1):167-73 PubMed

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;25(5):483-8 PubMed

J Pediatr Urol. 2008 Feb;4(1):51-4 PubMed

Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 1):e382-7 PubMed

Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Oct;34(10):798-804 PubMed

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;25(5):489-92 PubMed

J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):724-7; discussion 727 PubMed

Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Mar;23(3):347-53 PubMed

Clin Radiol. 2003 Dec;58(12):964-70 PubMed

J Urol. 1992 Aug;148(2 Pt 2):604-5 PubMed

Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jun;97(6):708-13 PubMed

BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):17-21 PubMed

Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):586-93 PubMed

Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Jun;23(6):897-904 PubMed

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):745-9 PubMed

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;25(4):378-83 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...