Why acetylcholinesterase reactivators do not work in butyrylcholinesterase
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- acetylcholinesterasa chemie MeSH
- antidota chemie MeSH
- butyrylcholinesterasa chemie MeSH
- konformace proteinů MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- molekulární modely MeSH
- myši MeSH
- otrava organofosfáty MeSH
- oximy chemie terapeutické užití MeSH
- reaktivátory cholinesterasy chemie MeSH
- vazebná místa MeSH
- vztahy mezi strukturou a aktivitou MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- acetylcholinesterasa MeSH
- antidota MeSH
- butyrylcholinesterasa MeSH
- oximy MeSH
- reaktivátory cholinesterasy MeSH
The pyridinium oxime therapy for treatment of organophosphate poisoning is a well established, but not sufficient method. Recent trends also focus on prophylaxis as a way of preventing even the entrance of organophosphates into the nervous system. One of the possible prophylactic methods is increasing the concentration of butyrylcholinesterase in the blood with the simultaneous administration of butyrylcholinesterase reactivators, when the enzyme is continuously reactivated by oxime. This article summarizes and sets forth the structural differences between butyrylcholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase, essential for the future design of butyrylcholinesterase reactivators. Butyrylcholinesterase lacks the reactivator aromatic binding pocket found in acetylcholinesterase, which is itself a part of the acetylcholinesterase peripheral anionic site. This difference finally renders the current acetylcholinesterase reactivators, when used in butyrylcholinesterase, non-functional.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org