Theory predicts that sexually antagonistic mutations will be over- or under-represented on the X and Z chromosomes, depending on their average dominance coefficients. However, as little is known about the dominance coefficients for new mutations, the effect of sexually antagonistic selection is difficult to predict. To elucidate the role of sexually antagonistic selection in the evolution of Z chromosome gene content in chicken, we analyzed publicly available microarray data from several somatic tissues as well as somatic and germ cells of the ovary. We found that the Z chromosome is enriched for genes showing preferential expression in ovarian somatic cells, but not for genes with preferential expression in primary oocytes or non-sex-specific somatic tissues. Our results suggest that sexual antagonism leads to a higher abundance of female-benefit alleles on the Z chromosome. No bias toward Z-linkage for oocyte-enriched genes can be explained by lower intensity of sexually antagonistic selection in ovarian germ cells compared to ovarian somatic cells. An alternative explanation would be that meiotic Z chromosome inactivation hinders accumulation of oocyte-expressed genes on the Z chromosome. Our results are consistent with findings in mammals and indicate that recessive rather than dominant sexually antagonistic mutations shape the gene content of the X and Z chromosomes.

Department of Zoology Charles University Prague Vinicná 7 128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):R202 PubMed

Evolution. 1984 Jul;38(4):735-742 PubMed

J Mol Evol. 2006 Nov;63(5):676-81 PubMed

Trends Genet. 1999 Oct;15(10):383-5 PubMed

Trends Genet. 2005 Sep;21(9):495-9 PubMed

Nat Genet. 2004 Jun;36(6):642-6 PubMed

Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R80 PubMed

Bioessays. 2003 Aug;25(8):739-41 PubMed

Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jul;20(7):1113-6 PubMed

Genetics. 2009 Jun;182(2):493-501 PubMed

Science. 2003 Jan 31;299(5607):697-700 PubMed

Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008;9:109-27 PubMed

Nat Genet. 2001 Apr;27(4):422-6 PubMed

Biostatistics. 2003 Apr;4(2):249-64 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Nov 10;33(20):e175 PubMed

Development. 2007 May;134(10):1823-31 PubMed

PLoS Biol. 2007 Oct;5(10):e273 PubMed

J Biol. 2007;6(1):2 PubMed

Science. 2003 Jun 13;300(5626):1742-5 PubMed

Development. 2004 Jan;131(2):311-23 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000493 PubMed

Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Aug;7(8):645-53 PubMed

Am Nat. 2009 Feb;173(2):141-50 PubMed

Science. 2004 Jan 23;303(5657):537-40 PubMed

Chromosoma. 1993 Jan;102(2):71-80 PubMed

Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 May-Jun;39(5-6):315-21 PubMed

Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 4;16(7):660-7 PubMed

Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008 Dec;18(6):493-8 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Jan 22;266(1415):203-9 PubMed

Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Sep;8(9):689-98 PubMed

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jun;1168:52-71 PubMed

Nat Genet. 2008 Jun;40(6):794-9 PubMed

J Mol Evol. 2009 May;68(5):576-83 PubMed

Evolution. 2009 Jun;63(6):1464-72 PubMed

PLoS Biol. 2008 Apr 1;6(4):e80 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2009 May;5(5):e1000466 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Mar;102(3):312-20 PubMed

Nature. 2007 Nov 8;450(7167):238-41 PubMed

Genome Res. 2009 May;19(5):897-903 PubMed

Development. 2002 Jan;129(2):479-92 PubMed

Annu Rev Genet. 1994;28:491-521 PubMed

BMC Biol. 2007 Sep 20;5:40 PubMed

Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1945-51 PubMed

BMC Genomics. 2008 Feb 29;9:110 PubMed

Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1151-61 PubMed

Genome Res. 2002 Dec;12(12):1854-9 PubMed

BMC Genomics. 2005 Mar 05;6:29 PubMed