Recurrence of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy is caused by the overgrowth of the original diseased host endothelium

. 2011 Jul ; 136 (1) : 93-101. [epub] 20110622

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid21695473

Posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy (PPCD) is a rare, bilateral autosomal dominant disorder affecting primarily the corneal endothelium and descemet membrane (DM). The aim of this study was to establish the origin of abnormal endothelium in a patient with PPCD exhibiting cornea graft failure after keratoplasty surgery. A sex-mismatched graft obtained from a patient with PPCD who underwent repeat penetrating keratoplasty and the patient's original cornea were investigated. Combined fluorescent immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin (CK) 19 (a marker of aberrant PPCD endothelium) with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of the sex chromosomes were used in order to characterize the cells on the posterior graft surface. The pathological endothelium of the failed PPCD cornea revealed strong positivity for CK19 using fluorescent immunohistochemistry. In all the CK19-positive cells, both X and Y chromosomes were simultaneously detected using FISH. The results clearly showed the original cells of the patient (XY), within 3.5 years, almost totally overgrown the posterior corneal surface of the graft (XX). Moreover, an abnormal posterior collagenous layer populated by fibroblast-like cells was observed between DM and the endothelium in the failed graft, but its exact origin could not be established due to the low number of cells. Simultaneous detection of CK19 using fluorescent immunohistochemistry together with the detection of gonosomes using FISH was performed for the first time in the cornea and allowed us to prove that the recurrence of PPCD was caused by pathological abnormal proliferation and migration of recipient cells into donor graft.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Cornea. 1994 Nov;13(6):509-15 PubMed

J Mol Diagn. 2006 Sep;8(4):459-65 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;52(12):893-7 PubMed

Exp Eye Res. 2009 May;88(5):945-52 PubMed

Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Jun 15;99(6):697-703 PubMed

Exp Eye Res. 1981 Nov;33(5):535-44 PubMed

Am J Ophthalmol. 1971 Nov;72(5):879-87 PubMed

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994;92:133-65 PubMed

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2008 May;16(3):279-86 PubMed

Hum Mol Genet. 2002 May 1;11(9):1029-36 PubMed

Exp Eye Res. 2007 Apr;84(4):680-6 PubMed

Histochem Cell Biol. 1996 May;105(5):401-4 PubMed

Exp Eye Res. 1999 Mar;68(3):341-6 PubMed

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Apr;51(4):1898-904 PubMed

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1985;83:413-75 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;94(6):790-4 PubMed

Hum Mutat. 2007 Jun;28(6):638 PubMed

Histochem Cell Biol. 2004 Jan;121(1):73-9 PubMed

Ann Ophthalmol. 1988 Oct;20(10):388-90, 393 PubMed

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980 Jul;19(7):832-5 PubMed

Histochem Cell Biol. 1997 Oct-Nov;108(4-5):391-402 PubMed

Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Oct;103(10):1520-4 PubMed

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan-Feb;60(1):59-60 PubMed

Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr;135(4):461-70 PubMed

Histochem Cell Biol. 1996 Nov;106(5):481-5 PubMed

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1969;67:235-64 PubMed

Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Oct 1;10(21):2415-23 PubMed

Cornea. 1997 Jul;16(4):439-46 PubMed

Cornea. 2001 Aug;20(6):560-9 PubMed

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;50(6):2673-8 PubMed

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4480-4 PubMed

J Histochem Cytochem. 2004 Oct;52(10):1333-9 PubMed

Am J Hum Genet. 2005 Nov;77(5):694-708 PubMed

Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Mar 15;109(3):323-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...