BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Invasiveness of some alien plants is associated with their traits, plastic responses to environmental conditions and interpopulation differentiation. To obtain insights into the role of these processes in contributing to variation in performance, we compared congeneric species of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) with different origin and invasion status that occur in central Europe. METHODS: Native I. noli-tangere and three alien species (highly invasive I. glandulifera, less invasive I. parviflora and potentially invasive I. capensis) were studied and their responses to simulated canopy shading and different nutrient and moisture levels were determined in terms of survival and seedling traits. KEY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Impatiens glandulifera produced high biomass in all the treatments and the control, exhibiting the 'Jack-and-master' strategy that makes it a strong competitor from germination onwards. The results suggest that plasticity and differentiation occurred in all the species tested and that along the continuum from plasticity to differentiation, the species at the plasticity end is the better invader. The most invasive species I. glandulifera appears to be highly plastic, whereas the other two less invasive species, I. parviflora and I. capensis, exhibited lower plasticity but rather strong population differentiation. The invasive Impatiens species were taller and exhibited higher plasticity and differentiation than native I. noli-tangere. This suggests that even within one genus, the relative importance of the phenomena contributing to invasiveness appears to be species' specific.

Institute of Botany Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Průhonice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Adamowski W. Balsams on the offensive: the role of planting in the invasion of Impatiens species. In: Tokarska-Guzik B, Brock JH, Brundu G, Child L, Daehler CC, Pyšek P, editors. Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 2008. pp. 57–70.

Agrawal AA. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science. 2001;294:321–326. PubMed

Alexander JM. Genetic differences in the elevational limits of native and introduced Lactuca serriola populations. Journal of Biogeography. 2010;37:1951–1961.

Andrews M, Maule HG, Raven JA, Mistry A. Extension growth of Impatiens glandulifera at low irradiance: importance of nitrate and potassium accumulation. Annals of Botany. 2005;95:641–648. PubMed PMC

Baker HG. Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL, editors. The genetics of colonizing species. New York: Academic Press; 1965. pp. 147–168.

Beerling DJ, Perrins DM. Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Impatiens Roylei Walp.) Journal of Ecology. 1993;81:367–381.

Berg MP, Ellers J. Trait plasticity in species interactions: a driving force of community dynamics. Evolutionary Ecology. 2010;24:617–629.

Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2011;26:333–339. PubMed

Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M. Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:106–115. PubMed

Brock MT, Galen C. Drought tolerance in the alpine dandelion, Taraxacum ceratophorum (Asteraceae), its exotic congener T. officinale, and interspecific hybrids under natural and experimental conditions. American Journal of Botany. 2005;92:1311–1321. PubMed

Burns JH. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflower (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Diversity and Distribution. 2004;10:387–397.

Burns JH, Winn AA. A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biological Invasions. 2006;8:797–807.

Cahill JF, Jr, Kembel SW, Lamb EG, Keddy PA. Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2008;10:41–50.

Coombe DE. Biological flora of the British Isles: Impatiens parviflora DC. Journal of Ecology. 1956;44:701–714.

Daehler CC. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2003;34:183–211.

Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecology Letters. 2011;14:419–431. PubMed

Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology. 2000;88:528–534.

Dietz H, Edwards PJ. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology. 2006;87:1359–1367. PubMed

Donohue K, Pyle EH, Messiqua D, Heschel MS, Schmitt J. Adaptive divergence in plasticity in natural populations of Impatiens capensis and its consequences for performance in novel habitats. Evolution. 2001;55:692–702. PubMed

Dudley SA, Schmitt J. Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens capensis from open and woodland sites. Functional Ecology. 1995;9:655–666.

Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C-3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment. 1999;22:1337–1349.

Funk JL. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. Journal of Ecology. 2008;96:1162–1173.

Grotkopp E, Rejmánek M. High seedling relative growth rate and specific leaf area are traits of invasive species: phylogenetically independent contrasts of woody angiosperms. American Journal of Botany. 2007;94:526–532. PubMed

Hastwell GT, Panetta FD. Can differential responses to nutrients explain the success of environmental weeds? Journal of Vegetation Science. 2005;16:77–84.

Hatcher PE. Biological flora of the British Isles. Impatiens noli-tangere L. Journal of Ecology. 2003;91:147–167.

Hejda M, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Chytrý M, Jarošík V. Invasion success of alien plants: do habitats affinities in the native distribution range matter? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2009;18:372–382.

Heschel MS, Donohue K, Hausman N, Schmitt J. Population differentiation and natural selection for water-use efficiency in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae) International Journal of Plant Sciences. 2002;163:907–912.

Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology. 1992;6:324–327.

Kartesz JT, Meacham CA. Synthesis of the North American flora. Version 1·0. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Botanical Garden; 1999.

Keller SR, Taylor DR. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:852–866. PubMed

van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters. 2010;13:235–245. PubMed

Kubešová M, Moravcová L, Suda J, Jarošík V, Pyšek P. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia. 2010;82:81–96.

Leicht-Young SA, Silander JA, Jr, Latimer AM. Comparative performance of invasive and native Celastrus species across environmental gradients. Oecologia. 2007;154:273–282. PubMed

Mathsoft Inc. S-Plus 2000: guide to statistics. Seattle, WA: Mathsoft; 2000.

Monty A, Mahy G. Evolution of dispersal traits along an invasion route in the wind-dispersed Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae) Oikos. 2010;119:1563–1570.

Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Havlíčková V, Zákravský P. Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia. 2010;82:365–390.

Morgan DC, Smith H. A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta. 1979;145:253–258. PubMed

Morrison JA, Mauck K. Experimental field comparison of native and non-native maple seedlings: natural enemies, ecophysiology, growth and survival. Journal of Ecology. 2007;95:1036–1049.

Perglová I, Pergl J, Skálová H, Moravcová L, Jarošík V, Pyšek P. Differences in germination and seedling establishment of alien and native Impatiens species. Preslia. 2009;81:357–375.

Pigliucci M. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2005;20:481–486. PubMed

Prentis PJ, Wilson JRU, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ. Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13:288–294. PubMed

Pyšek P, Prach K. Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandulifera: a century of spreading reconstructed. Biological Conservation. 1995;74:41–48.

Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In. In: Nentwig W, editor. Biological invasions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007. pp. 97–126.

Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia. 2002;74:97–186.

Rejmánek M, Richardson DM. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology. 1996;77:1655–1661.

Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: Van der Maarel E, editor. Vegetation ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. pp. 332–355.

Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M. Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters. 2006;9:981–993. PubMed

Roach DA, Wulff RD. Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1987;18:209–235.

Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 2001;32:305–332.

Seastedt TS, Pyšek P. Mechanisms of plant invasions of North American and European grasslands. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2011;42:133–153.

Schmitt J, Ehrhardt DW. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution. 1990;44:269–278. PubMed

Simpson RL, Leck MA, Parker VT. The comparative ecology of Impatiens capensis Meerb. in Central New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 1985;112:295–311.

Skálová H, Krahulec F. The response of three Festuca rubra clones to changes in light quality and plant density. Functional Ecology. 1992;6:282–290.

Skálová H, Moravcová L, Pyšek P. Germination dynamics and seedling frost resistance of invasive and native Impatiens species reflect local climatic conditions. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2011;13:173–180.

Slavík B. In: Impatiens parviflora. Květena České republiky [Flora of the Czech Republic] vol. 5. Slavík B, Chrtek J Jr, Tomšovic P, editors. Prague: Academia; 1997. pp. 234–236.

Sultan SE. Phenotypic plasticity for fitness components in Polygonum species of contrasting ecological breadth. Ecology. 2001;82:328–343.

Wade M. Predicting plant invasions: making a start. In: Brock JH, Wade M, Pyšek P, Green D, editors. Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe. Leiden: Backhuys Publisher; 1997. pp. 1–18.

Williams DG, Mack RN, Black RA. Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology. 1995;76:1569–1580.

Williams JL, Auge H, Maron JL. Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens. Oecologia. 2008;157:239–248. PubMed

Yeh PJ, Price TD. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the successful colonization of a novel environment. American Naturalist. 2004;164:531–542. PubMed

Zheng YL, Feng Y-L, Liu WX, Liao ZY. Growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and its native congeners grown at four irradiances. Plant Ecology. 2009;203:263–271.

Effect of temperature and nutrients on the growth and development of seedlings of an invasive plant

Getting the right traits: reproductive and dispersal characteristics predict the invasiveness of herbaceous plant species

Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage

Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs

Invasiveness does not predict impact: response of native land snail communities to plant invasions in riparian habitats

Effect of intra- and interspecific competition on the performance of native and invasive species of Impatiens under varying levels of shade and moisture