BACKGROUND: Older age, as a factor we cannot affect, is consistently one of the main negative prognostic values in patients with acute myocardial infarction. One of the most powerful factors that improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes is the revascularization preferably performed by percutaneous coronary intervention. No data is currently available for the role of age in large groups of consecutive patients with PCI as the nearly sole method of revascularization in AMI patients. The aim of this study was to analyze age-related differences in treatment strategies, results of PCI procedures and both in-hospital and long-term outcomes of consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3814 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients divided into two groups according to age (1800 patients ≤ 65 years and 2014 patients > 65 years). Significantly more older patients had a history of diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarctions. RESULTS: The older population had a significantly lower rate of coronary angiographies (1726; 95.9% vs. 1860; 92.4%, p < 0.0001), PCI (1541; 85.6% vs. 1505; 74.7%, p < 0.001), achievement of optimal final TIMI flow 3 (1434; 79.7% vs. 1343; 66.7%, p < 0.001) and higher rate of unsuccessful reperfusion with final TIMI flow 0-1 (46; 2.6% vs. 78; 3.9%, p = 0.022). A total of 217 patients (5.7%) died during hospitalization, significantly more often in the older population (46; 2.6% vs. 171; 8.5%, p < 0.001). The long-term mortality (data for 2847 patients from 2 centers) was higher in the older population as well (5 years survival: 86.1% vs. 59.8%). Though not significantly different and in contrast with PCI, the presence of diabetes mellitus, previous MI, final TIMI flow and LAD, as the infarct-related artery, had relatively lower impact on the older patients. Severe heart failure on admission (Killip III-IV) was associated with the worst prognosis in the whole group of patients, though its significance was higher in the youngers (HR 6.04 vs. 3.14, p = 0.051 for Killip III and 12.24 vs. 5.65, p = 0.030 for Killip IV). We clearly demonstrated age as a strong discriminator for the whole population of AMI patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a consecutive AMI population, the older group (>65 years) was associated with a less pronounced impact of risk factors on long-term outcome. To ascertain the coronary anatomy by coronary angiography and proceed to PCI if suitable regardless of age is crucial in all patients, though the primary success rate of PCI in the older age is lower. Age, when viewed as a risk factor, was a dominant discriminating factor in all patients.

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M, Sorel M, Selby JV, Go AS. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2155–2165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908610. PubMed DOI

Danchin N, Puymirat E, Aissaoui N, Adavane S, Durand E. Epidemiology of acute coronary syndromes in France and in Europe. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2010;59(Suppl 2):S37–S41. PubMed

Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9. PubMed DOI

Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, Van De Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KAA. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2345–2353. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2345. PubMed DOI

Gharacholou SM, Lopes RD, Alexander KP, Mehta RH, Stebbins AL, Pieper KS, James SK, Armstrong PW, Granger CB. Age and Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings From the APEX-AMI Trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:559–567. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.36. PubMed DOI

Bauer T, Koeth O, Jünger C, Heer T, Wienbergen H, Gitt A, Zahn R, Senges J, Zeymer U. Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2873. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm464. PubMed DOI

Newell MC, Henry JT, Henry TD, Duval S, Browning JA, Christiansen EC, Larson DM, Berger AK. Impact of age on treatment and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2011;161:664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.12.018. PubMed DOI

Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined–a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:959–969. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4. PubMed DOI

De Bruyne MC, Mosterd A, Hoes AW, Kors JA, Kruijssen DACM, Van Bemmel JH, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Prevalence, determinants, and misclassification of myocardial infarction in the elderly. Epidemiology. 1997;8:495–500. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199709000-00004. PubMed DOI

Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde MF, Descotes-Genon V, Oettinger J, Ecarnot F, Bassand J-P. Changes in management of elderly patients with myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:987–994. PubMed

Shelton RJ, Crean AM, Somers K, Priestley C, Hague C, Blaxill JM, Wheatcroft SB, McLenachan JM, Greenwood JP, Blackman DJ. Real-world outcome from ST elevation myocardial infarction in the very elderly before and after the introduction of a 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention service. Am Heart J. 2010;159:956–963. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.02.026. PubMed DOI

Mehta RH, Rathore SS, Radford MJ, Wang Y, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: differences by age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:736–741. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01432-2. PubMed DOI

Mehta RH, Sadiq I, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Avezum A, Spencer F, Kline-Rogers E, Allegrone J, Pieper K, Fox KAA, Eagle KA. Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with that of thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2004;147:253–259. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.08.007. PubMed DOI

Ishihara M, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Shimatani Y, Miura F, Nakama Y, Dai K, Ootani T, Ooi K, Ikenaga H, Miki T, Nakamura M, Kishimoto S, Sumimoto Y. Comparison of gender-specific mortality in patients < 70 years versus ≥ 70 years old with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:772–775. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.04.030. PubMed DOI

Hafiz AM, Jan MF, Mori N, Gupta A, Bajwa T, Allaqaband S. Contemporary clinical outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly versus younger patients presenting with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Interv Cardiol. 2011;24:357–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00634.x. PubMed DOI

Nicolau JC, Lemos PA, Wajngarten M, Giraldez RR, Serrano CV, Martinez EE, Baracioli LM, Kalil R, Jatene FB, Dallan LA, Puig LB, Stolf NA. The role of invasive therapies in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clinics. 2009;64:553–560. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000600010. PubMed DOI PMC

Association of circulating levels of RANTES and -403G/A promoter polymorphism to acute heart failure after STEMI and to cardiogenic shock