Minority cytotypes in European populations of the Gymnadenia conopsea complex (Orchidaceae) greatly increase intraspecific and intrapopulation diversity

. 2012 Oct ; 110 (5) : 977-86.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23002267

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patterns of ploidy variation among and within populations can provide valuable insights into the evolutionary mechanisms shaping the dynamics of plant systems showing ploidy diversity. Whereas data on majority ploidies are, by definition, often sufficiently extensive, much less is known about the incidence and evolutionary role of minority cytotypes. METHODS: Ploidy and proportions of endoreplicated genome were determined using DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) flow cytometry in 6150 Gymnadenia plants (fragrant orchids) collected from 141 populations in 17 European countries. All widely recognized European species, and several taxa of less certain taxonomic status were sampled within Gymnadenia conopsea sensu lato. KEY RESULTS: Most Gymnadenia populations were taxonomically and/or ploidy heterogeneous. Two majority (2x and 4x) and three minority (3x, 5x and 6x) cytotypes were identified. Evolution largely proceeded at the diploid level, whereas tetraploids were much more geographically and taxonomically restricted. Although minority ploidies constituted <2 % of the individuals sampled, they were found in 35 % of populations across the entire area investigated. The amount of nuclear DNA, together with the level of progressively partial endoreplication, separated all Gymnadenia species currently widely recognized in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their low frequency, minority cytotypes substantially increase intraspecific and intrapopulation ploidy diversity estimates for fragrant orchids. The cytogenetic structure of Gymnadenia populations is remarkably dynamic and shaped by multiple evolutionary mechanisms, including both the ongoing production of unreduced gametes and heteroploid hybridization. Overall, it is likely that the level of ploidy heterogeneity experienced by most plant species/populations is currently underestimated; intensive sampling is necessary to obtain a holistic picture.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Barow M. Endopolyploidy in seed plants. BioEssays. 2006;28:271–281. PubMed

Bateman RM, Hollingsworth PM, Preston J, Luo Y-B, Pridgeon AM, Chase MW. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae) Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2003;142:1–40.

Bateman RM, Rudall PJ, James KE. Phylogenetic context, generic affinities and evolutionary origin of the enigmatic Balkan orchid Gymnadenia frivaldii Hampe ex Griseb. Taxon. 2006;55:107–118.

Beck G. Flora von Niederösterreich. 1893 II/2. Wien.

Bory S, Catrice O, Brown S, et al. Natural polyploidy in Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae) Genome. 2008;51:816–826. PubMed

Bournérias M, Prat D, editors. Les Orchidées de France, Belgique et Luxembourg. 2nd edn. Mèze: Biotope Press; 2005.

Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytologist. 1995;129:1–22. PubMed

Brochmann C, Brysting AK, Alsos IG, et al. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;82:521–536.

Burton TL, Husband BC. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae) Heredity. 1999;82:381–390. PubMed

Campbell VV, Rowe G, Beebee TJC, Hutchings MJ. Genetic differentiation amongst fragrant orchids (Gymnadenia conopsea s.l.) in the British Isles. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2007;155:349–360.

Delforge P. Guide des Orchidées d'Europe, d'Afrique du Nord et du Proche-Orient. 3rd edn. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé; 2005.

Delforge P. Orchids of Europe, North Africa and the Middle East. London: A & C Black; 2006.

Dworschak W. Gliederung der verschiedenen Erscheinungsformen der Mücken-Händelwurz in Südbayern. Jahresberichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal. 2002;55:27–45.

Gregory TR. The evolution of the genome. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005.

Groll M. Fruchtansatz, Bestäubung und Merkmalsanalyse bei diploiden und polyploiden Sippen von Dactylorchis (Orchis) maculata und Gymnadenia conopsea. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift. 1965;112:657–700.

Gustafsson S, Lönn M. Genetic differentiation and habitat preference of flowering-time variants within Gymnadenia conopsea. Heredity. 2003;91:284–292. PubMed

Hedrén M, Klein E, Teppner H. Evolution of polyploids in the European orchid genus Nigritella: evidence from allozyme data. Phyton-Annales Rei Botanicae A. 2000;40:239–275.

Hermosilla CE, Sabando J. Notas sobre orquídeas II. Estudios del Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Álava. 1996:123–128. 10–11.

Heusser K. Chromosomenverhältnisse bei schweizerischen basitonen Orchideen. Berichte der Schweizerischen Botanischen Gesellschaft. 1938;48:562–605.

Huber FK, Kaiser R, Sauter W, Schiestl FP. Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species of Gymnadenia (Orchidaceae) Oecologia. 2005;142:564–575. PubMed

Husband BC, Baldwin SJ, Suda J. The incidence of polyploidy in natural plant populations: major patterns and evolutionary processes. In: Leitch IJ, Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Wendel JF, editors. Plant genome diversity. Vol. 2. New York: Springer Verlag (in press); 2012.

Jersáková J, Castro S, Sonk N, et al. Absence of pollinator-mediated premating barriers in mixed-ploidy populations of Gymnadenia conopsea s.l. (Orchidaceae) Evolutionary Ecology. 2010;24:1199–1218.

Jiao YN, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473:97–100. PubMed

Kreutz CAJ. Kompendium der Europäischen Orchideen. Landgraaf: Kreutz Publishers; 2004.

Kreutz CAJ, Dekker H. De orchideeën van Nederland – ecologie, verspreiding, bedreiging, beheer. Raalte and Landgraaf: BJ Seckel and CAJ Kreutz; 2000.

Kron P, Suda J, Husband BC. Applications of flow cytometry to evolutionary and population biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2007;38:847–876.

Levin DA. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Li D, Liu Y, Zhong C, Huang H. Morphological and cytotype variation of wild kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis complex) along an altitudinal and longitudinal gradient in central-west China. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2010;164:72–83.

Lönn M, Alexandersson R, Gustafsson S. Hybrids and fruit set in a mixed flowering-time population of Gymnadenia conopsea (Orchidaceae) Hereditas. 2006;143:222–228. PubMed

Mandáková T, Münzbergová Z. Distribution and ecology of cytotypes of the Aster amellus aggregate in the Czech Republic. Annals of Botany. 2006;98:845–856. PubMed PMC

Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ, Bastida JM, Weiss-Lehman CW, Raskin E, Mitchell-Olds T. Environmental aridity is associated with cytotype segregation and polyploidy occurrence in Brachypodium distachyon (Poaceae) New Phytologist. 2011;193:797–805. PubMed PMC

Marhold K, Jongepierová I, Krahulcová A, Kučera J. Morphological and karyological differentiation of Gymnadenia densiflora and G. conopsea in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Preslia. 2005;77:159–176.

Masterson J. Stomatal size in fossil plants – evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science. 1994;264:421–424. PubMed

Mráz P, Šingliarová B, Urfus T, Krahulec F. Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): altitudinal and longitudinal differences in ploidy level distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the general pattern in Europe. Annals of Botany. 2008;101:59–71. PubMed PMC

Mrkvička AC. Statistische Untersuchungen an Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. s.l. Mitteilungsblatt Arbeitskreis Heimische Orchideen Baden-Württemberg. 1993;25:361–367.

Nakagawa M. Ploidy, geographical distribution and morphological differentiation of Parasenecio auriculata (Senecioneae; Asteraceae) in Japan. Journal of Plant Research. 2006;119:51–61. PubMed

Otto SP, Whitton J. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics. 2000;34:401–437. PubMed

Parisod C, Holderegger R, Brochmann C. Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytologist. 2010;186:5–17. PubMed

Ramsey JD, Schemske W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1998;29:467–501.

Scacchi R, De Angelis G. Isoenzyme polymorphism in Gymnadenia conopsea and its inferences for systematics within this species. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 1989;17:25–33.

Schlechter FRR. Mitteilungen über europäische und mediterrane Orchideen II. Feddes Repertorium. 1919;16:279.

Sokolovskaya AP, Strelkova OS. Kariologicheskoe issledovanie vysokogornoi flory Glavnogo Kavkazskogo khrebta i problema geograficheskogo rasprostraneniya poliploidov. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 1940;29:413–416.

Soliva M, Widmer A. Genetic and floral divergence among sympatric populations of Gymnadenia conopsea s.l. (Orchidaceae) with different flowering phenology. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 1999;160:897–905. PubMed

Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, et al. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. American Journal of Botany. 2009;96:336–348. PubMed

Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW, et al. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species? Taxon. 2007;56:13–30.

Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, García PE, et al. Distribution and habitat segregation on different spatial scales among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) in the Eastern Alps. Annals of Botany. 2010;106:967–977. PubMed PMC

Stark C, Michalski SG, Babik W, Winterfeld G, Durka W. Strong genetic differentiation between Gymnadenia conopsea and G. densiflora despite morphological similarity. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 2011;293:213–226.

Strann KB, Bjerke JW. Orkideer i Nord-Norge. Østfold: Arctic Research and Consulting DA; 2010.

Suda J, Kron P, Husband BC, Trávníček P. Flow cytometry and ploidy: applications in plant systematics, ecology and evolutionary biology. In: Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J, editors. Flow cytometry with plant cells. Analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2007. pp. 103–130.

Torosyan GK. Chromosome numbers of some Armenian Orchidaceae. Biologicheskii Zhurnal Armenii. 1990;43:256–259.

Trávníček P, Eliášová E, Suda J. The distribution of cytotypes of Vicia cracca in Central Europe: the changes that have occurred over the last four decades. Preslia. 2010;82:149–163.

Trávníček P, Kubátová B, Čurn V, et al. Remarkable coexistence of multiple cytotypes of the Gymnadenia conopsea aggregate (the fragrant orchid): evidence from flow cytometry. Annals of Botany. 2011;107:77–87. PubMed PMC

Vöth W, Sontag S. Die intraspezifischen Varietäten der Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R. Br. Journal Europäischer Orchideen. 2006;38:581–624.

Wegener KA. Ein Beitrag zur Zytologie von Orchideen aus dem Gebiet der DDR. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe. 1966;15:1–7.

Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2009;106:13875–13879. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...