Evaluation of Lactobacillus strains for selected probiotic properties
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antibióza * MeSH
- antiinfekční látky metabolismus MeSH
- bakteriální adheze MeSH
- Caco-2 buňky MeSH
- epitelové buňky mikrobiologie MeSH
- Escherichia coli O157 fyziologie MeSH
- Lactobacillus růst a vývoj fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiální viabilita účinky léků MeSH
- probiotika farmakologie MeSH
- žaludeční šťáva mikrobiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antiinfekční látky MeSH
Eleven strains of Lactobacillus collected in the Culture Collection of Dairy Microorganisms (CCDM) were evaluated for selected probiotic properties such as survival in gastrointestinal fluids, antimicrobial activity, and competition with non-toxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 for adhesion on Caco-2 cells. The viable count of lactobacilli was reduced during 3-h incubation in gastric fluid followed by 3-h incubation in intestinal fluid. All strains showed antimicrobial activity and the three most effective strains inhibited the growth of at least 16 indicator strains. Antimicrobial metabolites of seven strains active against Lactobacillus and Clostridium indicator strains were found to be sensitive to proteinase K and trypsin, which indicates their proteinaceous nature. The degree of competitive inhibition of non-toxigenic E. coli O157:H7 adhesion on the surface of Caco-2 cells was strain-dependent. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the number of non-toxigenic E. coli O157:H7 adhering to Caco-2 cells was observed with all lactobacilli. Three strains were selected for additional studies of antimicrobial activity, i.e., Lactobacillus gasseri CCDM 215, Lactobacillus acidophilus CCDM 149, and Lactobacillus helveticus CCDM 82.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2008;2008:357964 PubMed
J Microbiol Methods. 2005 Feb;60(2):225-33 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(6):569-76 PubMed
J Nutr. 2008 Nov;138(11):2264-8 PubMed
Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec;27(8):1121-7 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Jun 30;132(2-3):109-16 PubMed
Anaerobe. 2008 Nov;14(5):251-5 PubMed
Nutr Rev. 2009 Sep;67(9):546-50 PubMed
Pflugers Arch. 1996 Jun;432(2):225-33 PubMed
Braz J Microbiol. 2010 Oct;41(4):1009-18 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Mar 15;146(1):1-13 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006 Jul;30(4):487-513 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):4949-56 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Nov 30;120(1-2):51-70 PubMed
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2010 Dec;2(4):233-40 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 Apr 1;99(3):287-96 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4435-54 PubMed
J Dairy Res. 2006 Nov;73(4):417-22 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):449-55 PubMed
Bile tolerance and its effect on antibiotic susceptibility of probiotic Lactobacillus candidates
