Lactobacillus isolates from weaned piglets' mucosa with inhibitory activity against common porcine pathogens
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Microbial MeSH
- Bacillus cereus drug effects MeSH
- Clostridium perfringens drug effects MeSH
- Escherichia coli drug effects MeSH
- Feces microbiology MeSH
- Ileum microbiology MeSH
- Culture Media, Conditioned pharmacology MeSH
- Culture Media chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Lactic Acid pharmacology MeSH
- Lactobacillus drug effects isolation & purification metabolism MeSH
- Mucins metabolism MeSH
- Swine Diseases prevention & control MeSH
- Weaning MeSH
- Hydrogen Peroxide metabolism MeSH
- Immunity, Innate MeSH
- Probiotics MeSH
- Staphylococcus aureus drug effects MeSH
- Intestinal Mucosa microbiology MeSH
- Sus scrofa microbiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Culture Media, Conditioned MeSH
- Culture Media MeSH
- Lactic Acid MeSH
- Mucins MeSH
- Hydrogen Peroxide MeSH
Twelve lactobacilli isolates from mucosa of 3-5-week-old weaned pigs were found to exert good antimicrobial activity against common porcine pathogens (S. aureus, B. cereus, E. coli, C. perfringens). Two of them produced in addition to lactic acid also considerable amounts of acetic acid, and 6 of them produced hydrogen peroxide and metabolites other than organic acids. Isolates 4/26 and 2/25 (identified as L. crispatus or L. amylovorus) were inhibitory against most strains of S. aureus, B. cereus and E. coli, and especially the strain 4/26 survived well in simulated gastric and intestinal juice. Diarrhea-causing E. coli O8K88H9 Ent(+) was successfully inhibited by the growing culture as well as by the catalase-treated and neutralized supernatant of L. reuteri 12/26. Mucin degradation and multiple resistance to antibiotics were not observed.
See more in PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(1):89-93 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Feb 25;81(1):1-10 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Jan 1;90(1):93-106 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Aug 8;225(1):125-30 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(5):507-10 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):673-90 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8982-6 PubMed
J Clin Invest. 1981 Jan;67(1):163-72 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2007;52(2):115-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(1):84-8 PubMed
Bacteriol Rev. 1976 Sep;40(3):722-56 PubMed
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;45(1):91-5 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(3):730-9 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Jan 26;82(1):1-11 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Nov;65(11):4949-56 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(3):239-42 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;66(10):4325-33 PubMed
Res Microbiol. 2005 Mar;156(2):154-60 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):3821-30 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(1):61-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(3):243-7 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 2005 Apr;50(4):202-7 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Oct 20;44(1-2):93-106 PubMed
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;82(1-4):279-89 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998 Sep 1;166(1):15-20 PubMed
J Dairy Res. 2006 Nov;73(4):417-22 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):449-55 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jan;59(1):158-66 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Jan 22;63(1-2):81-90 PubMed
Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep;24(6):559-70 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(3):189-94 PubMed
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):465S-470S PubMed
Evaluation of Lactobacillus strains for selected probiotic properties
