Oral application of Enterococcus faecium strain EE3 in healthy dogs
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17004657
DOI
10.1007/bf02932129
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Enterococcus faecium růst a vývoj MeSH
- lipidy krev MeSH
- nemoci psů mikrobiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- obezita prevence a kontrola veterinární MeSH
- počet mikrobiálních kolonií MeSH
- probiotika aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- psi MeSH
- střeva mikrobiologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- psi MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- lipidy MeSH
The ability of canine strain Enterococcus faecium EE3 to survive in healthy dogs and its effect on microbiological and biochemical parameters was determined. The strain was individually applied to 11 dogs per os at a dose of 10(9) CFU/mL (differed from 2 to 3 mL) for 1 week and persisted in feces for 3 months after cessation of its administration (reaching average concentration of 6.83 +/- 0.95 log CFU/g). Seven d after administration, a decrease in staphylococci and a significant decrease in Pseudomonas-like bacteria was observed. On the other hand, concentration of lactic acid bacteria increased but the growth of E. coli was not influenced. In the blood samples of dogs after 0-1 d (before application) and the blood samples 1 week after application, total lipids decreased in 8 dogs; the total protein also decreased. The levels of cholesterol were brought to the physiological level, i.e. in blood samples with low cholesterol values it increased to the physiological level and in those with high levels it decreased; cholesterol was not influenced in 3 dogs.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2001 Mar 20;79(2):183-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):172-4 PubMed
Am J Vet Res. 2004 Mar;65(3):338-43 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(3):301-5 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(4):640-6 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):143-6 PubMed
Gut. 1991 Apr;32(4):439-42 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4201-7 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(5):443-7 PubMed
Br J Nutr. 2002 May;87 Suppl 2:S297-300 PubMed
Anaerobe. 2006 Apr;12(2):75-9 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):203-7 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Oct 20;44(1-2):93-106 PubMed
Can Vet J. 2002 Oct;43(10):771-4 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):199-202 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):523-30 PubMed
Vet Res Commun. 2003 May;27(4):275-80 PubMed
J Nutr. 2003 Apr;133(4):1158-62 PubMed
Probiotic potential of enterococci isolated from canine feed
Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from rabbits
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus species isolated from Slovak Bryndza cheese