BACKGROUND: Plumage polymorphism may evolve during coevolution between brood parasites and their hosts if rare morph(s), by contravening host search image, evade host recognition systems better than common variant(s). Females of the parasitic common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) are a classic example of discrete color polymorphism: gray females supposedly mimic the sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), while rufous females are believed to mimic the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus). Despite many studies on host responses to adult cuckoos comprehensive tests of the "hawk mimicry" and "kestrel mimicry" hypotheses are lacking so far. RESULTS: We tested these hypotheses by examining host responses to stuffed dummies of the sparrowhawk, kestrel, cuckoo and the innocuous turtle dove (Streptopelia turtur) as a control at the nest. Our experimental data from an aggressive cuckoo host, the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus), showed low effectiveness of cuckoo-predator mimicry against more aggressive hosts regardless of the type of model and the degree of perfection of the mimic. Specifically, warblers discriminated gray cuckoos from sparrowhawks but did not discriminate rufous cuckoos from kestrels. However, both gray and rufous cuckoos were attacked vigorously and much more than control doves. The ratio of aggression to gray vs. rufous cuckoo was very similar to the ratio between frequencies of gray vs. rufous cuckoo morphs in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our data combined with previous results from other localities suggest polymorphism dynamics are not strongly affected by local predator model frequencies. Instead, hosts responses and discrimination abilities are proportional, other things being equal, to the frequency with which hosts encounter various cuckoo morphs near their nests. This suggests that female cuckoo polymorphism is a counter-adaptation to thwart a specific host adaptation, namely an ability to not be fooled by predator mimicry. We hypothesize the dangerousness of a particular model predator (sparrowhawks are more dangerous to adult birds than kestrels) may be another important factor responsible for better discrimination between the gray cuckoo and its model rather than between the rufous cuckoo and its model. We also provide a review of relevant existing literature, detailed discussion of plumage polymorphism in cuckoos, methodological recommendations and new ideas for future work.

Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Palacký University 17 listopadu 50 Olomouc CZ 771 46 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bond AB. The evolution of color polymorphism: crypticity, searching images, and apostatic selection. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2007;38:489–514. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095728. DOI

Fowlie MK, Krüger O. The evolution of plumage polymorphism in birds of prey and owls: the apostatic selection hypothesis revisited. J Evol Biol. 2003;16:577–583. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00564.x. PubMed DOI

Galeotti P, Rubolini D, Dunn PO, Fasola M. Colour polymorphism in birds: causes and functions. J Evol Biol. 2003;16:635–646. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00569.x. PubMed DOI

Payne RB. Interspecific communication signals in parasitic birds. Am Nat. 1967;101:363–375. doi: 10.1086/282504. DOI

Honza M, Šicha V, Procházka P, Ležalová R. Host nest defense against a color-dimorphic brood parasite: great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) versus common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) J Ornithol. 2006;147:629–637. doi: 10.1007/s10336-006-0088-y. DOI

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of reed warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science. 2012;337:578–580. doi: 10.1126/science.1220759. PubMed DOI

Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Cuckoo-hawk mimicry? An experimental test. Proc R Soc B. 2008;275:1817–1822. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0331. PubMed DOI PMC

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. A parasite in wolf’s clothing: hawk mimicry reduces mobbing of cuckoos by hosts. Behav Ecol. 2011;22:574–579. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr008. DOI

Feeney WE, Welbergen JA, Langmore NE. The frontline of avian brood parasite-host coevolution. Anim Behav. 2012;84:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.011. DOI

Voipio P. The hepaticus variety and the juvenile types of the cuckoo. Ornis Fenn. 1953;30:97–117.

Krüger O, Davies NB, Sorenson MD. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in parasitic cuckoos: sexual selection or coevolution. Proc R Soc B. 2007;274:1553–1560. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0281. PubMed DOI PMC

Thorogood R, Davies NB. Hawk mimicry and the evolution of polymorphic cuckoos. Chinese Birds. 2013;4:39–50. doi: 10.5122/cbirds.2013.0002. DOI

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Curr Biol. 2009;19:235–240. PubMed

Mappes J, Lindström L. How did the cuckoo get its polymorphic plumage? Science. 2012;337:532–533. doi: 10.1126/science.1225997. PubMed DOI

Trnka A, Prokop P. The effectiveness of hawk mimicry in protecting the cuckoos from aggressive hosts. Anim Behav. 2012;83:263–268. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.036. DOI

Trnka A, Prokop P, Grim T. Uncovering dangerous cheats: how do avian hosts recognize adult brood parasites? PLoS One. 2012;7:e37445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037445. PubMed DOI PMC

Sealy SG, Neudorf DL, Hobson KA, Gill SA. In: Parasitic birds and their hosts: Studies in coevolution. Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Nest defense by potential hosts of the brown-headed cowbird: methodological approaches, benefits of defense, and coevolution; pp. 194–211.

Grim T. Host recognition of brood parasites: Implications for methodology in studies of enemy recognition. Auk. 2005;122:530–543. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0530:HROBPI]2.0.CO;2. DOI

Danko Š, Darolová A, Krištín A. Birds distribution in Slovakia. Bratislava: Veda; 2003.

Dyrcz A, Halupka L. Great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus and reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus respond differently to cuckoo dummy at the nest. J Ornithol. 2006;147:649–652. doi: 10.1007/s10336-006-0097-x. DOI

Grim T. Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc. 2005;84:69–78.

Grim T. Mimicry, signalling, and coevolution. Ethology. 2013;119:270–277. doi: 10.1111/eth.12067. DOI

Molnár B. The cuckoo in the Hungarian Plain. Aquila. 1944;51:100–112.

Janisch M. Fight between Cuculus c. canorus L. – cuckoo – and Acrocephalus a. arundinaceus L. – great reed warbler. Aquila. 1948;55:291.

Lindholm AK, Thomas RJ. Differences between populations of reed warblers in defences against brood parasitism. Behaviour. 2000;137:25–42. doi: 10.1163/156853900501854. DOI

Davies NB, Welbergen JA. Social transmission of a host defense against cuckoo parasitism. Science. 2009;324:1318–320. doi: 10.1126/science.1172227. PubMed DOI

Strnad M, Němec M, Veselý P, Fuchs R. Red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) adjust the mobbing intensity, but not mobbing frequency, by assessing the potential threat to themselves from different predators. Ornis Fenn. 2012;89:206–2015.

Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen GL, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis. 2000;142:247–258.

Wyllie I. The cuckoo. London: Batsford; 1981.

Langmore NE, Spottiswoode CN. In: Host manipulation by parasites. Hughes DP, Brodeur J, Thomas F, editor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Host manipulation through visual trickery in avian brood parasites; pp. 95–115.

Grim T. The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:785–802.

Grim T. Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm? Front Zool. 2011;8(6):14. PubMed PMC

Stoddard MC. Mimicry and masquerade from the avian visual perspective. Curr Zool. 2012;58:630–648.

Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Stokke BG, Bičík V, Moskát C. Aggression to dummy cuckoos by potential European cuckoo hosts. Behaviour. 2002;139:613–628. doi: 10.1163/15685390260136735. DOI

Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol. 2011;80:508–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01798.x. PubMed DOI

Matyjasiak P. Birds associate species-specific acoustic and visual cues: recognition of heterospecific rivals by male blackcaps. Behav Ecol. 2004;16:467–471. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ari012. DOI

Ligon RA, Hill GE. Do adult eastern bluebird, Sialia sialis, males recognize juvenile-specific traits? Anim Behav. 2009;77:1267–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.031. PubMed DOI PMC

Moskát C. Nest defence and egg rejection in great reed warblers over the breeding cycle: are they synchronised with the risk of brood parasitism? Ann Zool Fenn. 2006;42:579–586.

Honza M, Procházka P, Šicha V, Požgayová M. Nest defence in a cuckoo host: great reed warblers risk themselves equally for their own and parasitic chicks. Behaviour. 2010;147:741–756. doi: 10.1163/000579510X491081. DOI

Trnka A, Grim T. To compensate or not to compensate: testing the negotiation model in the context of nest defence. Behav Ecol. 2013;24:223–228. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ars157. DOI

Čapek M, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Honza M. Repeated presentations of the common cuckoo increase nest defense by the Eurasian reed warbler but do not induce it to make recognition errors. Condor. 2010;112:763–769. doi: 10.1525/cond.2010.100063. DOI

Campobello D, Sealy SG. Enemy recognition of reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus): threats and reproductive value act independently in nest defence modulation. Ethology. 2010;115:498–508.

Trnka A, Prokop P. Does social mating system influence nest defence behaviour in great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) males? Ethology. 2010;116:1075–1083. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01821.x. DOI

Graham MH. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology. 2003;84:2809–2815. doi: 10.1890/02-3114. DOI

Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008. PubMed DOI

Nakagawa S. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol. 2004;15:1044–1045. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arh107. DOI

Lombardi CM, Hurlbert SH. Misprescription and misuse of one-tailed tests. Austral Ecol. 2009;34:447–468.

Host nest defence does not act as selective agent against plumage polymorphism in brood parasites

Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) versus common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): An example of ineffective cuckoo-hawk mimicry