Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm?

. 2011 Jun 13 ; 8 () : 14. [epub] 20110613

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu úvodníky

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid21668974

Evolutionary arms-races between avian brood parasites and their hosts have typically resulted in some spectacular adaptations, namely remarkable host ability to recognize and reject alien eggs and, in turn, sophisticated parasite egg mimicry. In a striking contrast to hosts sometimes rejecting even highly mimetic eggs, the same species typically fail to discriminate against highly dissimilar parasite chicks. Understanding of this enigma is still hampered by the rarity of empirical tests - and consequently evidence - for chick discrimination. Recent work on Australian host-parasite systems (Gerygone hosts vs. Chalcites parasites), increased not only the diversity of hosts showing chick discrimination, but also discovered an entirely novel host behavioural adaptation. The hosts do not desert parasite chicks (as in all previously reported empirical work) but physically remove living parasites from their nests. Here, I briefly discuss these exciting findings and put them in the context of recent empirical and theoretical work on parasite chick discrimination. Finally, I review factors responsible for a relatively slow progress in this research area and suggest most promising avenues for future research.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Zahavi A. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975;53:205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. PubMed DOI

Tanaka KD, Ueda K. Horsfield's hawk-cuckoo nestlings simulate multiple gapes for begging. Science. 2005;308:653–653. doi: 10.1126/science.1109957. PubMed DOI

Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K. Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett. 2010;6:67–69. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0540. PubMed DOI PMC

Tokue K, Ueda K. Mangrove Gerygones Gerygone laevigaster eject Little Bronze-cuckoo Chalcites minutillus hatchlings from parasitized nests. Ibis. 2010;152:835–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01056.x. DOI

Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature. 2003;422:157–160. doi: 10.1038/nature01460. PubMed DOI

Payne RB, Woods JL, Payne LL. Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Anim Behav. 2001;62:473–483. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1773. DOI

Shizuka D, Lyon BE. Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks. Nature. 2010;463:223–226. doi: 10.1038/nature08655. PubMed DOI

Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Heinsohn R, Hall ML, Peters A, Kilner RM. Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B. in press . PubMed PMC

Davies NB. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & A D Poyser; 2000.

Danchin É, Giraldeau LC, Cézilly F. Behavioural Ecology. Oxford: OUP; 2008.

Alcock J. Animal Behavior. 9. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2009.

Grim T. The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res. 2006;8:785–802.

Grim T. Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann Zool Fennici. 2007;44:1–7.

Soler M. Co-evolutionary arms race between brood parasites and their hosts at the nestling stage. J Avian Biol. 2009;40:237–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04676.x. DOI

Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol Sci. 2005;4:17–29. doi: 10.2326/osj.4.17. DOI

Winfree R. Cuckoos, cowbirds and the persistence of brood parasitism. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:338–342. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01643-2. PubMed DOI

Lotem A. Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature. 1993;362:743–745. doi: 10.1038/362743a0. DOI

Marchetti K. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav. 2000;59:877–883. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1388. PubMed DOI

Amundsen T, Brobakken PT, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Rejection of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs in relation to female age in the bluethroat Luscinia svecica. J Avian Biol. 2002;33:366–370. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2002.02894.x. DOI

Stokke BG, Rudolfsen G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology. 2004;110:459–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00978.x. DOI

Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav Ecol. 1992;3:128–132. doi: 10.1093/beheco/3.2.128. DOI

Honza M, Procházka P, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Čapek M, Mrlík V. Are blackcaps current winners in the evolutionary struggle against the common cuckoo? J Ethol. 2004;22:175–180. doi: 10.1007/s10164-004-0119-1. DOI

Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Jackson C, Huhta E, Rutila J, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Fixed rejection responses to single and multiple experimental parasitism in two Fringilla hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology. 2009;115:840–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01679.x. DOI

Krüger O. Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2007;362:1873–1886. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1849. PubMed DOI PMC

Planqué R, Britton NF, Franks NR, Peletier MA. The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull Math Biol. 2002;64:1045–1068. doi: 10.1006/bulm.2002.0311. PubMed DOI

Britton NF, Planqué R, Franks NR. Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter-victim systems. Bull Math Biol. 2007;69:957–988. doi: 10.1007/s11538-006-9178-5. PubMed DOI

Grim T. Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B. 2007;274:373–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3731. PubMed DOI PMC

Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG. Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol. 2011;80:508–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01798.x. PubMed DOI

Honza M, Procházka P, Šicha V, Požgayová M. Nest defence in a cuckoo host: great reed warblers risk themselves equally for their own and parasitic chicks. Behaviour. 2010;147:741–756. doi: 10.1163/000579510X491081. DOI

Hegemann A, Voesten R. Can skylarks Alauda arvensis discriminate a parasite nestling? Possible case of nestling cuckoo Cuculus canorus ejection by its host parents. Ardea. 2011;99:117–120. doi: 10.5253/078.099.0114. DOI

Redondo T. Exploitation of host mechanisms for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etología. 1993;3:235–297.

Fraga RM. In: Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts. Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius) pp. 173–193.

Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O. Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B. 2003;270:S73–S75. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0017. PubMed DOI PMC

Anderson MG, Moskát C, Bán M, Grim T, Cassey P, Hauber ME. Egg eviction imposes a recoverable cost of virulence in chicks of a brood parasite. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e7725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007725. PubMed DOI PMC

Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME. The cost of virulence: an experimental study of egg eviction by brood parasitic chicks. Behav Ecol. 2009;20:1138–1146. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arp108. DOI

Grim T. Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol. 2008;26:9–15. doi: 10.1007/s10164-007-0037-0. DOI

Davies NB, Brooke M, de L. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol. 1989;58:207–224. doi: 10.2307/4995. DOI

Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Braa AT, Korsnes L, Lampe HM, Pedersen HC. Behavioural responses of potential hosts towards artificial cuckoo eggs and dummies. Behaviour. 1991;116:64–89. doi: 10.1163/156853990X00365. DOI

Welbergen JA, Davies NB. Strategic variation in mobbing as a front line of defense against brood parasitism. Cur Biol. 2009;19:235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.041. PubMed DOI

Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Kilner RM. Are dark cuckoo eggs cryptic in host nests? Anim Behav. 2009;78:461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.003. DOI

Grim T. Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc. 2005;84:69–78.

Sato NJ, Mikami OK, Ueda K. Egg dilution effect hypothesis: a condition under which parasitic nestling ejection behaviour will evolve. Ornithol Sci. 2010;9:115–121. doi: 10.2326/osj.9.115. DOI

Lawes MJ, Marthews TR. When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model. Behav Ecol. 2003;14:757–770. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg068. DOI

Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM. Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol. 2009;61:497–503.

Cassey P, Honza M, Grim T, Hauber ME. The modelling of avian visual perception predicts behavioural rejection responses to foreign egg colours. Biol Lett. 2008;4:515–517. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0279. PubMed DOI PMC

Schuetz JG. Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim Behav. 2005;70:839–848. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.007. DOI

Polačiková L, Grim T. Blunt egg pole holds cues for alien egg discrimination: experimental evidence. J Avian Biol. 2010;41:111–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.04983.x. DOI

Polačiková L, Stokke BG, Procházka P, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. The role of blunt egg pole characteristics for recognition of eggs in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos) Behaviour. 2010;147:465–478. doi: 10.1163/000579509X12584427339575. DOI

Langmore NE, Maurer G, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM. Socially acquired host-specific mimicry and the evolution of host races in Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis. Evolution. 2008;62:1689–1699. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00405.x. PubMed DOI

Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG, Møller AP. Chick recognition and acceptance: a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1995;37:243–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00177403. DOI

Lichtenstein G. Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick-chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim Behav. 2001;61:401–413. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1595. DOI

Soler M. Do hosts of interspecific brood parasites feed parasitic chicks with lower-quality prey? Anim Behav. 2008;76:1761–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.07.020. DOI

Schuetz JG. Low survival of parasite chicks may result from their imperfect adaptation to hosts rather than expression of defenses against parasitism. Evolution. 2005;59:2017–2024. PubMed

Davies NB. Cuckoo adaptations: trickery and tuning. J Zool. 2011;284:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00810.x. DOI

Antonov A, Stokke BG, Vikan JR, Fossøy F, Ranke PS, Røskaft E, Moksnes A, Møller AP, Shykoff JA. Egg phenotype differentiation in sympatric cuckoo Cuculus canorus gentes. J Evol Biol. 2010;23:1170–1182. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01982.x. PubMed DOI

Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M. Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:8672–8676. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910486107. PubMed DOI PMC

Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Rutila J, Huhta E, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Evolution of defences against cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) parasitism in bramblings (Fringilla montifringilla): a comparison of four populations in Fennoscandia. Evol Ecol. 2010;24:1141–1157. doi: 10.1007/s10682-010-9360-y. DOI

Anderson MG, Ross HA, Brunton DH, Hauber ME. Begging call matching between a specialist brood parasite and its host: a comparative approach to detect coevolution. Biol J Linn Soc. 2009;98:208–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01256.x. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...