One of the great evolutionary puzzles is why hosts of parasitic birds discriminate finely against alien eggs, but almost never discriminate against parasitic chicks. A theoretical model has shown that an adaptive host response to alien eggs can be based on learning. However, learned nestling discrimination is too costly to be favoured by selection in hosts of evicting parasites, such as the European cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Indeed, parasitic chick rejection has never been reported for any European cuckoo host species. As learned nestling discrimination is maladaptive, one can expect that a viable alternative for hosts would be to use discrimination mechanisms not involving learning and/or recognition. We suggest that hosts may starve and desert cuckoo chicks that require higher amounts of food than an average host brood at fledging (i.e. feeding rates to a parasite are outside the normal range of host behaviour in unparasitized nests). Our observations of the reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) at parasitized nests indicate that such behaviour could possibly work in this host species.

Laboratory of Ornithology Palacký University Tr Svobody 26 CZ 771 46 Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2551-8 PubMed

Sci Am. 1974 Sep;231(3):92-105 PubMed

Nature. 2003 Mar 13;422(6928):157-60 PubMed

Multiple costs are relevant for evolution of host anti-parasite defences. Reply to Yang C et al. (2018)

Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm?

Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host