Recognition is considered a critical basis for discriminatory behaviours in animals. Theoretically, recognition and discrimination of parasitic chicks are not predicted to evolve in hosts of brood parasitic birds that evict nest-mates. Yet, an earlier study showed that host reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) of an evicting parasite, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), can avoid the costs of prolonged care for unrelated young by deserting the cuckoo chick before it fledges. Desertion was not based on specific recognition of the parasite because hosts accept any chick cross-fostered into their nests. Thus, the mechanism of this adaptive host response remains enigmatic. Here, I show experimentally that the cue triggering this 'discrimination without recognition' behaviour is the duration of parental care. Neither the intensity of brood care nor the presence of a single-chick in the nest could explain desertions. Hosts responded similarly to foreign chicks, whether heterospecific or experimental conspecifics. The proposed mechanism of discrimination strikingly differs from those found in other parasite-host systems because hosts do not need an internal recognition template of the parasite's appearance to effectively discriminate. Thus, host defences against parasitic chicks may be based upon mechanisms qualitatively different from those operating against parasitic eggs. I also demonstrate that this discriminatory mechanism is non-costly in terms of recognition errors. Comparative data strongly suggest that parasites cannot counter-evolve any adaptation to mitigate effects of this host defence. These findings have crucial implications for the process and end-result of host-parasite arms races and our understanding of the cognitive basis of discriminatory mechanisms in general.

Department of Zoology Palacky University tr Svobody 26 771 46 Olomouc Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Beecher M.D, Beecher I.M, Hahn S. Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows. II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim. Behav. 1981;29:95–101.

Britton, N. F., Planqué, R. & Franks, N. R. In press. Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter-victim systems. Bull. Math. Biol PubMed

Cramp, S. (ed.) 1992 Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic vol. VI, Warblers, p. 728. Oxford, UK: University Press.

Davies N.B. T & A.D. Poyser; London, UK: 2000. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats.

Davies N.B, Brooke M.L. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J. Anim. Ecol. 1989;58:225–236. 10.2307/4996 DOI

Davies N.B, Kilner R.M, Noble D.G. Nestling cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, exploit hosts with begging calls that mimic a brood. Proc. R. Soc. B. 1998;265:673–678. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0346 DOI

Grim T. Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2005;84:69–78. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00414.x DOI

Grim T. The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2006a;8:785–802.

Grim T. Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2006;60:716–723. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0215-z DOI

Grim T, Honza M. Differences in parental care of reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) to its own nestlings and parasitic cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) chicks. Folia Zool. 1997;46:135–142.

Grim T, Honza M. Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo's host? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2001;49:322–329. doi:10.1007/s002650000295 DOI

Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O. Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc. R. Soc. B. 2003;270:S73–S75. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0017 PubMed DOI PMC

Hauber M.E, Sherman P.W. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:609–616. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01916-0 PubMed DOI

Holen Ø.H, Saetre G.P, Slagsvold T, Stenseth N.C. Parasites and supernormal manipulation. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2001;268:2551–2558. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1818 PubMed DOI PMC

Honza M, Grim T, Capek M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. Nest defence, enemy recognition and nest inspection behaviour of experimentally parasitized reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Bird Study. 2004;51:256–263.

Hund K, Prinzinger R. Zur Jugendentwicklung der Körpertemperature und des Körpergewichtes beim Kuckuck Cuculus canorus. Ökologie der Vogel. 1980;2:130–131.

Johnsen I, Erikstad K.E, Saether B.-E. Regulation of parental investment in a long-lived seabird, the puffin Fratercula arctica—an experiment. Oikos. 1994;71:273–278.

Langmore N.E, Hunt S, Kilner R.M. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature. 2003;422:157–160. doi:10.1038/nature01460 PubMed DOI

Lessells C.M, Coulthard N.D, Hodgson P.J, Krebs J.R. Chick recognition in European bee-eaters: acoustic playback experiments. Anim. Behav. 1991;42:1031–1033.

Lichtenstein G. Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick–chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim. Behav. 2001;61:401–413. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1595 DOI

Lotem A. Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature. 1993;362:743–745. doi:10.1038/362743a0 DOI

Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A. Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim. Behav. 1995;49:1185–1209. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0152 DOI

Nilsson J.A, Svensson M. Fledging in altricial birds: parental manipulation or sibling competition? Anim. Behav. 1993;46:379–386. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1200 DOI

Payne R.B, Woods J.L, Payne L.L. Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Anim. Behav. 2001;62:473–483. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1773 DOI

Planqué R, Britton N.F, Franks N.R, Peletier M.A. The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull. Math. Biol. 2002;64:1045–1068. doi:10.1006/bulm.2002.0311 PubMed DOI

Redondo T. Exploitation of host mechanisms for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etología. 1993;3:235–297.

Redondo T, Carranza J. Offspring reproductive value and nest defense in the magpie (Pica pica) Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1989;25:369–378. doi:10.1007/BF00302995 DOI

Schuetz J.G. Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim. Behav. 2005;70:839–848. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.007 DOI

Servedio M.R, Hauber M.E. To eject or to abandon? Life history traits of hosts and parasites interact to influence fitness payoffs of alternative anti-parasite strategies. J. Evol. Biol. 2006;19:1585–1594. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01124.x PubMed DOI

Sherman P.W, Reeve H.K, Pfenning D.W. Recognition systems. In: Krebs J.R, Davies N.B, editors. Behavioural ecology. Blackwell Scientific; Oxford, UK: 1997. pp. 69–96.

Silverin B, Goldsmith A. The effects of modifying incubation on prolactin secretion in free-living pied flycatchers. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 1984;55:239–244. doi:10.1016/0016-6480(84)90107-2 PubMed DOI

Soler M. Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard M.L, editors. The evolution of begging. Kluwer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2002. pp. 413–427.

Soler M, Soler J.J, Martinez J.G, Møller A.P. Chick recognition and acceptance: a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1995;37:243–248. doi:10.1007/s002650050187 DOI

Soler J.J, Møller A.P, Soler M. A comparative study of host selection in the European cuckoo. Oecologia. 1999;118:265–276. doi:10.1007/s004420050727 PubMed DOI

Starck J.M, Ricklefs R.E, editors. Avian growth and development. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 1998.

Stokke B.G, Moksnes A, Røskaft E. The enigma of imperfect adaptations in hosts of avian brood parasites. Ornithol. Sci. 2005;4:17–29. doi:10.2326/osj.4.17 DOI

Rearing a virulent common cuckoo is not extra costly for its only cavity-nesting host

Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm?