A coprological survey of parasites of wild carnivores in Ireland

. 2013 Oct ; 112 (10) : 3587-93. [epub] 20130731

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23900557

The increasing movement of people to wilderness areas, shrinking of wildlife habitats and the resulting urbanisation of wildlife has led to growing concerns about the transfer of parasitic diseases, particularly from contaminated faeces. Faecal samples from wild carnivores in Ireland were examined for the presence of protozoan and nematode parasites. Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) samples (n = 91) were positive for Uncinaria stenocephala (38%), Eucoleus aerophilus (26%), Toxocara canis (20%), Trichuris vulpis (4%) and Isospora-like oocysts (9%). Badger (Meles meles) samples (n = 50) were positive for Uncinaria criniformis (40%), E. aerophilus (6%) and Isospora-like oocysts (16%). No parasites were observed in pine marten (n = 48; Martes martes) faeces. Approximately 5% of American mink (Mustela vison) samples were positive for Cryptosporidium by polymerase chain reaction (identified as Cryptosporidium andersoni (n = 3) and 'mink' genotype (n = 1)). The results suggest that wild carnivores in Ireland have a range of parasites, although it is unclear from the present study to what extent these infections are associated with morbidity. While it can be expected that, via their faeces, wild carnivores contribute to the spread of these parasites, they are unlikely the primary source of environmental contamination. Therefore, they should not always be the principal target of control measures.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2008 May 31;153(3-4):363-7 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 2010 Jan;124(1):90-7 PubMed

Z Parasitenkd. 1984;70(3):281-5 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997 Nov;25(5):380-4 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 2010 Jan;124(1):128-37 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2007 Mar;100(4):877-9 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;70(12):7574-7 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct;73(20):6475-83 PubMed

J Helminthol. 1994 Dec;68(4):331-6 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2007 Aug;101(3):605-11 PubMed

Prev Vet Med. 2007 Jun 15;80(1):65-73 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2007 Mar 15;144(1-2):153-6 PubMed

J Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;183(3):492-7 PubMed

Epidemiol Infect. 2003 Jun;130(3):561-8 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2000 Oct 20;92(4):245-51 PubMed

Vet Rec. 2001 Dec 22-29;149(25):759-63 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 1995 Feb;25(2):139-95 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2006 Oct;20(5):1349-57 PubMed

J R Soc Med. 1983 Jan;76(1):62-70 PubMed

Vet Rec. 2009 Aug 29;165(9):258-61 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2008 Jun 14;154(1-2):162-6 PubMed

J Helminthol. 2008 Dec;82(4):293-6 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 1995 Aug;59(1):39-51 PubMed

Parasitology. 1993 Aug;107 ( Pt 2):167-73 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992 Apr;5(2):120-9 PubMed

J Helminthol. 1996 Sep;70(3):259-63 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3153-8 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2006 Mar 31;136(3-4):307-16 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2003 Oct 8;116(2):97-113 PubMed

Science. 2000 Jan 21;287(5452):443-9 PubMed

J Helminthol. 2001 Jun;75(2):157-64 PubMed

Trends Parasitol. 2005 Aug;21(8):370-6 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Mar;28(3):495-503 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2007 Feb 28;143(3-4):347-53 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2006 Dec;92(6):1196-201 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 1956 Nov;5(6):587-621 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2007 Jun 20;147(1-2):176-84 PubMed

J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000 Jan-Feb;47(1):91-5 PubMed

J Helminthol. 2001 Jun;75(2):153-6 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2003 Dec 1;118(1-2):133-42 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Aug;65(8):3386-91 PubMed

J Wildl Dis. 2009 Jul;45(3):881-5 PubMed

Vet Parasitol. 2006 Jun 30;139(1-3):168-79 PubMed

Thorax. 1987 Dec;42(12):990-1 PubMed

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005 Sep;17(5):486-9 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...