Cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies including plerixafor in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23922227
DOI
10.1002/jca.21290
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- cost-effectiveness, mobilization, on demand, plerixafor, poor mobilizers,
- MeSH
- Cost-Benefit Analysis MeSH
- Benzylamines MeSH
- Cyclams MeSH
- Cytapheresis statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Length of Stay statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Models, Economic MeSH
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor economics therapeutic use MeSH
- Heterocyclic Compounds economics therapeutic use MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphoma economics surgery MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma economics surgery MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization economics methods MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Decision Trees MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation economics MeSH
- Health Expenditures MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czechoslovakia MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Benzylamines MeSH
- Cyclams MeSH
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor MeSH
- Heterocyclic Compounds MeSH
- plerixafor MeSH Browser
Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation. Mobilization of PBSCs using chemotherapy and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) however fails in around 20%. Combining G-CSF with plerixafor increases the mobilizations success. We compared cost-effectiveness of following schemes: the use of plerixafor "on demand" (POD) during the first mobilization in all patients with inadequate response, the remobilization with plerixafor following failure of the first standard mobilization (SSP), and the standard (re)mobilization scheme without plerixafor (SSNP). Decision tree models populated with data from a first-of-a-kind patient registry in six Czech centers (n = 93) were built to compare clinical benefits and direct costs from the payer's perspective. The success rates and costs for POD, SSP and SSNP mobilizations were; 94.9%, $7,197; 94.7%, $8,049; 84.7%, $5,991, respectively. The direct cost per successfully treated patient was $7,586, $8,501, and $7,077, respectively. The cost of re-mobilization of a poor mobilizer was $5,808 with G-CSF only and $16,755 if plerixafor was added. The total cost of plerixafor "on-demand" in the sub-cohort of poor mobilizers was $17,120. Generally, plerixafor improves the mobilization success by 10% and allows an additional patient to be successfully mobilized for incremental $11,803. Plerixafor is better and cheaper if used "on demand" than within a subsequent remobilization.
References provided by Crossref.org