The hemodynamic paradox as a phenomenon triggering recurrent reflux in varicose vein disease
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
23997567
PubMed Central
PMC3578628
DOI
10.1055/s-0032-1325168
PII: 03181
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- hemodynamic paradox, varicose vein recurrence, venous hemodynamics,
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
A curious hemodynamic phenomenon emerging as a consequence of the treatment of varicose veins can offer a reasonable explanation why varicose vein and reflux recurrences occur tenaciously irrespective of the applied therapeutic procedure. Saphenous reflux is the most important hemodynamic factor in varicose vein disease: it is responsible for the hemodynamic disturbance, ambulatory venous hypertension, clinical symptoms, and chronic venous insufficiency. Abolition of saphenous reflux eliminates the hemodynamic disturbance and restores physiological hemodynamic and pressure conditions, but at the same time it unavoidably evokes a pressure difference between the femoral vein and the incompetent superficial veins in the thigh during calf pump activity. The pressure difference increases flow and enhances fluid shear stress on the endothelium in pre-existing minor communicating channels between the femoral vein and the saphenous system in the thigh, which triggers release of biochemical agents nitride oxide and vascular endothelial growth factor; the consequence is enlargement (vascular remodeling) of the communicating channels, and ultimately reflux recurrence. Hence, the abolition of saphenous reflux creates preconditions for the comeback of the previous pathological situation. This phenomenon-starting the same trouble while fixing the problem-has been called hemodynamic paradox; is explains why varicose vein and reflux recurrence can occur after any mode of therapy.
See more in PubMed
El Wajeh Y, Giannoukas A D, Gulliford C J, Suvarna S K, Chan P. Saphenofemoral venous channels associated with recurrent veins are not neovascular. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(6):590–594. PubMed
Geier B, Stücker M, Hummel T. et al.Residual stumps associated with inguinal varicose vein recurrences: a multicenter study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36(2):207–210. PubMed
Jones L, Braithwaite B D, Selwyn D, Cooke S, Earnshaw J J. Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(4):442–445. PubMed
Winterborn R J, Foy C, Earnshaw J J. Causes of varicose vein recurrence: late results of a randomized controlled trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(4):634–639. PubMed
Dwerryhouse S, Davies B, Harradine K, Earnshaw J J. Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(4):589–592. PubMed
Egan B Donnelly M Bresnihan M Tierney S Feeley M Neovascularization: an “innocent bystander” in recurrent varicose veins J Vasc Surg 20064461279–1284., discussion 1284 PubMed
Joshi D, Sinclair A, Tsui J, Sarin S. Incomplete removal of great saphenous vein is the most common cause for recurrent varicose veins. Angiology. 2011;62(2):198–201. PubMed
Sarin S, Scurr J H, Coleridge Smith P D. Stripping of the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1994;81(10):1455–1458. PubMed
Frings N, Nelle A, Tran V TP, Glowacki P. Unavoidable recurrence and neoreflux after correctly performed ligation of the saphenofemoral junction: neovascularization? (German) Phlebologie. 2003;32:96–100.
Frings N, Nelle A, Tran P, Fischer R, Krug W. Reduction of neoreflux after correctly performed ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. A randomized study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28(3):246–252. PubMed
Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler J G, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(2):236–240. PubMed
Glass G M. Prevention of sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal recurrence of varicose veins by forming a partition to contain neovascularization. Phlebology. 1998;13:3–9.
Turton E P, Scott D J, Richards S P. et al.Duplex-derived evidence of reflux after varicose vein surgery: neoreflux or neovascularisation? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17(3):230–233. PubMed
Rij A M van, Jones G T, Hill G B, Jiang P. Neovascularization and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(2):296–302. PubMed
Allegra C, Antignani P L, Carlizza A. Recurrent varicose veins following surgical treatment: our experience with five years follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(6):751–756. PubMed
Recek C. Saphenofemoral junction ligation supplemented by postoperative sclerotherapy: a review of long-term clinical and hemodynamic results. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2004;38(6):533–540. PubMed
Nyamekye I, Shephard N A, Davies B, Heather B P, Earnshaw J J. Clinicopathological evidence that neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15(5):412–415. PubMed
Heim D, Negri M, Schlegel U, De Maeseneer M. Resecting the great saphenous stump with endothelial inversion decreases neither neovascularization nor thigh varicosity recurrence. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(5):1028–1032. PubMed
Winterborn R J, Foy C, Heather B P, Earnshaw J J. Randomized trial of flush saphenofemoral ligation for primary great saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;36:477–484. PubMed
Sheppard M. A procedure for the prevention of recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence. Aust N Z J Surg. 1978;48(3):322–326. PubMed
Gibbs P J, Foy D M, Darke S G. Reoperation for recurrent saphenofemoral incompetence: a prospective randomised trial using a reflected flap of pectineous fascia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18(6):494–498. PubMed
De Maeseneer M G, Philipsen T E, Vandenbroeck C P. et al.Closure of the cribriform fascia: an efficient anatomical barrier against postoperative neovascularisation at the saphenofemoral junction? A prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(3):361–366. PubMed
Earnshaw J J, Davies B, Harradine K, Heather B P. Preliminary results of PTFE patch saphenoplasty to prevent neovascularization leading to recurrent varicose veins. Phlebology. 1998;13:10–13.
Bhatti T S, Whitman B, Harradine K, Cooke S G, Heather B P, Earnshaw J J. Causes of re-recurrence after polytetrafluorethylene patch saphenoplasty for recurrent varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2000;87(10):1356–1360. PubMed
Winterborn R J, Earnshaw J J. Randomized trial of polytetrafluorethylene patch insertion for recurrent great saphenous varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34:367–373. PubMed
Recek C. Saphenous reflux as the cause of venous hemodynamic disturbance in primary varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency (German) Acta Chir Austriaca. 1998;30(2):76–77.
Recek C, Pojer H. Ambulatory pressure gradient in the veins of the lower extremity. Vasa. 2000;29(3):187–190. PubMed
Schaper W. Collateral circulation: past and present. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104(1):5–21. PubMed PMC
Pipp F, Boehm S, Cai W J. et al.Elevated fluid shear stress enhances postocclusive collateral artery growth and gene expression in the pig hind limb. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(9):1664–1668. PubMed
Schaper W, Scholz D. Factors regulating arteriogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(7):1143–1151. PubMed
Resnick N, Gimbrone M A. Hemodynamic forces are complex regulators of endothelial gene expression. FASEB J. 1995;9(10):874–882. PubMed
Schierling W, Troidl K, Troidl C, Schmitz-Rixen T, Schaper W, Eitenmüller I K. The role of angiogenic growth factors in arteriogenesis. J Vasc Res. 2009;46(4):365–374. PubMed
Calf pump activity influencing venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity