Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process
Jazyk angličtina Země Scotland Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24268714
DOI
10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.001
PII: S1010-5182(13)00286-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Additive-manufacturing, Bio-modelling, CBCT, DICOM, STL,
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- anatomické modely * MeSH
- design s pomocí počítače statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- kefalometrie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lebka anatomie a histologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mandibula anatomie a histologie MeSH
- nosní dutina anatomie a histologie MeSH
- orbita anatomie a histologie MeSH
- počítačová tomografie s kuželovým svazkem statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- počítačové zpracování obrazu statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti MeSH
- radiologické informační systémy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- sinus maxillaris anatomie a histologie MeSH
- software MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The process of fabricating physical medical skull models requires many steps, each of which is a potential source of geometric error. The aim of this study was to demonstrate inaccuracies and differences caused by DICOM to STL conversion in additively manufactured medical skull models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different institutes were requested to perform an automatic reconstruction from an identical DICOM data set of a patients undergoing tumour surgery into an STL file format using their software of preference. The acquired digitized STL data sets were assessed and compared and subsequently used to fabricate physical medical skull models. The three fabricated skull models were then scanned, and differences in the model geometries were assessed using established CAD inspection software methods. RESULTS: A large variation was noted in size and anatomical geometries of the three physical skull models fabricated from an identical (or "a single") DICOM data set. CONCLUSIONS: A medical skull model of the same individual can vary markedly depending on the DICOM to STL conversion software and the technical parameters used. Clinicians should be aware of this inaccuracy in certain applications.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org