Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process
Language English Country Scotland Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
24268714
DOI
10.1016/j.jcms.2013.10.001
PII: S1010-5182(13)00286-2
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Additive-manufacturing, Bio-modelling, CBCT, DICOM, STL,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Models, Anatomic * MeSH
- Computer-Aided Design statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Cephalometry statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Skull anatomy & histology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mandible anatomy & histology MeSH
- Nasal Cavity anatomy & histology MeSH
- Orbit anatomy & histology MeSH
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Radiology Information Systems statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Maxillary Sinus anatomy & histology MeSH
- Software MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The process of fabricating physical medical skull models requires many steps, each of which is a potential source of geometric error. The aim of this study was to demonstrate inaccuracies and differences caused by DICOM to STL conversion in additively manufactured medical skull models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different institutes were requested to perform an automatic reconstruction from an identical DICOM data set of a patients undergoing tumour surgery into an STL file format using their software of preference. The acquired digitized STL data sets were assessed and compared and subsequently used to fabricate physical medical skull models. The three fabricated skull models were then scanned, and differences in the model geometries were assessed using established CAD inspection software methods. RESULTS: A large variation was noted in size and anatomical geometries of the three physical skull models fabricated from an identical (or "a single") DICOM data set. CONCLUSIONS: A medical skull model of the same individual can vary markedly depending on the DICOM to STL conversion software and the technical parameters used. Clinicians should be aware of this inaccuracy in certain applications.
References provided by Crossref.org