How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29693215
DOI
10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5
PII: 10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Conflict processing, EEG, Emotions, Faces, Source localization,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- emoce fyziologie MeSH
- evokované potenciály fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mapování mozku * MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pozornost fyziologie MeSH
- vyjednávání psychologie MeSH
- výraz obličeje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The goal-directed control of behaviour critically depends on emotional regulation and constitutes the basis of mental well-being and social interactions. Within a socioemotional setting, it is necessary to prioritize effectively the relevant emotional information over interfering irrelevant emotional information to orchestrate cognitive resources and achieve appropriate behavior. Currently, it is elusive whether and how different socioemotional stimulus dimensions modulate cognitive control and conflict resolution. Theoretical considerations suggest that interference effects are less detrimental when conflicting emotional information is presented within a "positive socioemotional setting" compared with a "negative socioemotional setting." Using event-related potentials (ERPs) and source localization methods, we examined the basic system neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures associated with interactive effects of different interfering facial, socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution. We account for interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution, i.e., we show how the socioemotional valence modulates cognitive control (conflict processing). The data show that conflicts are stronger and more difficult to resolve in a negative emotional task-relevant setting than in a positive emotional task-relevant setting, where incongruent information barely induced conflicts. The degree of emotional conflict critically depends on the contextual emotional valence (positive or negative) in which this conflict occurs. The neurophysiological data show that these modulations were only reflected by late-stage conflict resolution processes associated with the middle (MFG) and superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Attentional selection processes and early-stage conflict monitoring do not seem to be modulated by interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):362-70 PubMed
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(10 ):1771-1783 PubMed
Front Integr Neurosci. 2012 Jul 09;6:42 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:342-349 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Nov;104(5):2523-31 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):38-48 PubMed
Neuron. 2006 Sep 21;51(6):871-82 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781-7 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):1122-35 PubMed
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):467-73 PubMed
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Feb;37(2):152-63 PubMed
Brain Struct Funct. 2014 Mar;219(2):595-605 PubMed
J Vis. 2011 Nov 30;11(13):24 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:44-52 PubMed
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jul 3;60:112-20 PubMed
Psychol Med. 2006 Jun;36(6):835-43 PubMed
Psychophysiology. 2012 Nov;49(11):1492-1503 PubMed
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):215-25 PubMed
Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6 PubMed
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Apr 29;541:34-8 PubMed
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;52(7):679-88 PubMed
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010 Mar;32(1):68-82 PubMed
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):988-1000 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1056-67 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 May 7;276(1662):1635-41 PubMed
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):151-60 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 28;6:28954 PubMed
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 08;6:6587 PubMed
Cogn Emot. 2000 Jan 1;14 (1):61-92 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):663-70 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):471-7 PubMed
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Aug;24(8):2120-9 PubMed
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400 PubMed
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Nov;10 (11):1577-87 PubMed
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Oct 1;292:10-8 PubMed
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar 13;40(5):1250-8 PubMed
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2017 Mar;48(2):103-110 PubMed
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Aug;25(6):465-76 PubMed
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 PubMed
Cortex. 2016 Dec;85:75-89 PubMed
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52 PubMed
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203 PubMed
Physiol Behav. 2002 Dec;77(4-5):477-82 PubMed
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Jun;18(6):1475-84 PubMed
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):152-70 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 11;6:31278 PubMed
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Dec;221(9):4575-4587 PubMed
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):895-903 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 28;6:37633 PubMed
Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 11;2:192 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Oct;46(12):2904-13 PubMed
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015 Dec;46(6):951-66 PubMed
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct;8(4):397-413 PubMed
Psychophysiology. 2000 Nov;37(6):817-30 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 15;135:324-32 PubMed
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Sep;93(3):283-97 PubMed
Transl Neurosci. 2016 Jul 13;7(1):56-61 PubMed
J Vis. 2013 Mar 18;13(4):13 PubMed
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1413-20 PubMed
PLoS One. 2009 May 20;4(5):e5537 PubMed
Front Psychol. 2012 May 25;3:164 PubMed
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):545-54 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 8;102(45):16518-23 PubMed
Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8 PubMed
Brain. 2006 Dec;129(Pt 12):3315-28 PubMed
Neurosci Lett. 2015 May 19;595:69-73 PubMed
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):257-61 PubMed
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):381-96 PubMed
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Mar;74:45-54 PubMed
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Jun 1;219(2):382-6 PubMed
Psychophysiology. 2009 Nov;46(6):1288-98 PubMed
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Jun;11(2):186-98 PubMed
PLoS One. 2014 May 12;9(5):e95198 PubMed
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002;24 Suppl D:5-12 PubMed
Cogn Emot. 2003 May;17 (3):477-500 PubMed
Cogn Emot. 2010 Feb 1;24(2):281-98 PubMed
J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5473-81 PubMed
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):341-53 PubMed
Cereb Cortex. 2017 May 13;:1-10 PubMed