Peptidoglycan hydrolases as species-specific markers to differentiate Lactobacillus helveticus from Lactobacillus gallinarum and other closely related homofermentative lactobacilli
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- DNA bakterií analýza genetika MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- genetické markery genetika MeSH
- Lactobacillus enzymologie genetika MeSH
- N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alaninamidasa genetika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA bakterií MeSH
- genetické markery MeSH
- N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alaninamidasa MeSH
We propose a new method that allows accurate discrimination of Lactobacillus helveticus from other closely related homofermentative lactobacilli, especially Lactobacillus gallinarum. This method is based on the amplification by PCR of two peptidoglycan hydrolytic genes, Lhv_0190 and Lhv_0191. These genes are ubiquitous and show high homology at the intra-species level. The PCR method gave two specific PCR products, of 542 and 747 bp, for 25 L. helveticus strains coming from various sources. For L. gallinarum, two amplicons were obtained, the specific 542 bp amplicon and another one with a size greater than 1,500 bp. No specific PCR products were obtained for 12 other closely related species of lactobacilli, including the L. acidophilus complex, L. delbrueckii, and L. ultunensis. The developed PCR method provided rapid, precise, and easy identification of L. helveticus. Moreover, it enabled differentiation between the two closely phylogenetically related species L. helveticus and L. gallinarum.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Food Microbiol. 2008 Oct;25(7):929-35 PubMed
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W71-4 PubMed
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jul;66(7):843-9 PubMed
Res Microbiol. 1997 Jul-Aug;148(6):461-74 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2000 Sep;89(3):511-6 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6908-22 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Mar 30;146(2):207-11 PubMed
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992 Jul;42(3):487-91 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 1995 Aug;31(2):114-8 PubMed
J Sci Food Agric. 2012 Oct;92(13):2703-8 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Apr 20;198(1):85-9 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Feb;114(2):404-12 PubMed
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004 Mar;27(2):151-9 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Nov;69(11):6750-7 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Sep;61(9):3391-9 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2013 Jan 1;160(3):290-7 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2012 Jul;57(4):263-7 PubMed
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 May;52(Pt 3):1043-1047 PubMed
Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2007 Sep;8(2):44-61 PubMed
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 Apr;269(2):201-6 PubMed
Food Microbiol. 2011 May;28(3):497-502 PubMed
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4435-54 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Aug 15;189(2):275-9 PubMed
Carbohydr Res. 2013 Sep 20;379:7-12 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Nov;300(1):146-52 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Oct;58(10):3429-32 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2011 Jul 15;148(1):1-7 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 2008 Jan;190(2):727-35 PubMed
