Ritual behaviors of some form exist in every society known to anthropologists. Despite this universality, we have little understanding of how ritual behavior varies within populations or across the lifespan, nor the determinants of this variation. Here we test hypotheses derived from life history theory by using behavioral observations and oral interview data concerning participant variation in Fijian kava-drinking ceremonies. We predicted that substantial variation in the frequency and duration of participation would result from (1) trade-offs with reproduction and (2) the intrinsic status differences between ritual participants. We demonstrate that when controlling for household composition, men with young offspring participated less frequently and exhibited greater variance in their time spent at ceremonies than men without young children. However, men with a larger number of total dependents in their household participated more frequently than those with fewer. Moreover, we found that men's ascribed rank, level of education, and reliance on wage labor all significantly predict their frequency of attendance. We also found that the number of dependents a man has in his household is positively correlated with total food production, and the amount of kava he cultivates. In general, these results suggest that ritual participation is part of an important strategy employed by Fijian men for both achieving status and developing social alliances. Variation in participation in kava ceremonies by Fijian men therefore reflects the constraints of their current life history condition and their inherited rank.

Laboratory for the Experimental Research of Religion Masaryk University Jaselska 199 16 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):224-30 PubMed

Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990 Oct;83(2):185-91 PubMed

Hum Nat. 2006 Mar;17(1):1-49 PubMed

Hum Nat. 2004 Mar;15(1):63-81 PubMed

Annu Rev Anthropol. 1999;28:397-430 PubMed

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;20(1):70-6 PubMed

J Hum Evol. 2006 Nov;51(5):454-70 PubMed

Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Feb;28(2):389-96 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32 PubMed

Science. 2008 Oct 3;322(5898):58-62 PubMed

J Hum Evol. 2002 Jun;42(6):639-57 PubMed

Hum Nat. 1995 Dec;6(4):325-60 PubMed

CNS Drugs. 2002;16(11):731-43 PubMed

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Mar;35(4):1067-74 PubMed

Hum Nat. 2005 Dec;16(4):323-59 PubMed

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;36(5):657-62 PubMed

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994 Jul;31(1):89-97 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2013 Aug;24(8):1602-5 PubMed

Hum Nat. 2002 Jun;13(2):161-97 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 7;275(1636):827-33 PubMed