Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamic variables using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock and individuals undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
24636922
DOI
10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.02.003
PII: S0883-9441(14)00057-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cardiogenic shock, Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Hemodynamics, Near-infrared spectroscopy, Oximetry,
- MeSH
- Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared methods MeSH
- Vascular Resistance physiology MeSH
- Hemodynamics MeSH
- Shock, Cardiogenic blood physiopathology therapy MeSH
- Blood Pressure physiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation methods MeSH
- Cardiac Output physiology MeSH
- Cerebrovascular Circulation physiology MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Oximetry methods MeSH
- Body Surface Area MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
PURPOSE: The relationship between near-infrared spectroscopy cerebral oximetry (CrSO2), peripheral oximetry (PrSO2) and hemodynamic variables is not fully understood. METHODS: The relationship between CrSO2/PrSO2 and cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock and those undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was retrospectively analyzed; in patients on ECMO, total circulatory index (TCI) was calculated from the sum of CI and extracorporeal blood flow index. RESULTS: In patients experiencing cardiogenic shock (n=10), significant correlations between PrSO2 values and CI (Spearman r=0.81; P<.0001), SVRI (r=-0.45; P<.0001), and MAP (r=0.58; P<.0001) were found. Significant correlations between CrSO2 and CI (r=0.55; P<.0001) and SVRI (r=-0.47; P<.0001), but not MAP, were observed. Linear regression analysis revealed that CI could be calculated using the following equation: CI=PrSO2/24.0. In patients on VA ECMO (n=12), significant correlations were found between PrSO2 and TCI (r=0.68; P<.0001), SVRI (r=-0.47; P<.0001), and MAP (r=0.27; P=.025). Significant correlations were also found between CrSO2 and TCI (r=0.68; P<.0001) and SVRI (r=-0.51; P<.0001), but not MAP. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study suggest that CrSO2 and PrSO2 in particular can be used for noninvasive estimation and monitoring of global circulatory status in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock and individuals undergoing ECMO.
References provided by Crossref.org
Biochemical markers for clinical monitoring of tissue perfusion