The effect of habitat structure on prey mortality depends on predator and prey microhabitat use
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- ekosystém * MeSH
- hmyz fyziologie MeSH
- lineární modely MeSH
- mortalita MeSH
- potravní řetězec * MeSH
- predátorské chování fyziologie MeSH
- roční období MeSH
- zooplankton fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Structurally complex habitats provide cover and may hinder the movement of animals. In predator-prey relationships, habitat structure can decrease predation risk when it provides refuges for prey or hinders foraging activity of predators. However, it may also provide shelter, supporting structures and perches for sit-and-wait predators and hence increase their predation rates. We tested the effect of habitat structure on prey mortality in aquatic invertebrates in short-term laboratory predation trials that differed in the presence or absence of artificial vegetation. The effect of habitat structure on prey mortality was context dependent as it changed with predator and prey microhabitat use. Specifically, we observed an 'anti-refuge' effect of added vegetation: phytophilous predators that perched on the plants imposed higher predation pressure on planktonic prey, while mortality of benthic prey decreased. Predation by benthic and planktonic predators on either type of prey remained unaffected by the presence of vegetation. Our results show that the effects of habitat structure on predator-prey interactions are more complex than simply providing prey refuges or cover for predators. Such context-specific effects of habitat complexity may alter the coupling of different parts of the ecosystem, such as pelagic and benthic habitats, and ultimately affect food web stability through cascading effects on individual life histories and trophic link strengths.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Oecologia. 2006 Nov;150(1):141-54 PubMed
J Anim Ecol. 2010 May;79(3):556-62 PubMed
Oecologia. 2004 Mar;139(1):1-10 PubMed
Oecologia. 2010 Jul;163(3):625-36 PubMed
Oecologia. 1994 Aug;98(3-4):344-353 PubMed
Oecologia. 1989 Aug;80(2):158-166 PubMed
Oecologia. 2004 Sep;141(1):105-13 PubMed
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1031-41 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37741 PubMed
Am Nat. 1997 Dec;150(6):798-812 PubMed
Ecology. 2008 Dec;89(12):3413-22 PubMed
Oecologia. 1990 Jun;83(3):371-377 PubMed
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Jan;6(1):8-13 PubMed
Oecologia. 2004 Sep;141(1):171-8 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):513-23 PubMed
Braz J Biol. 2008 Feb;68(1):211-9 PubMed
PeerJ. 2014 May 22;2:e389 PubMed