The structure of food webs is frequently described using phenomenological stochastic models. A prominent example, the niche model, was found to produce artificial food webs resembling real food webs according to a range of summary statistics. However, the size structure of food webs generated by the niche model and real food webs has not yet been rigorously compared. To fill this void, I use a body mass based version of the niche model and compare prey-predator body mass allometry and predator-prey body mass ratios predicted by the model to empirical data. The results show that the model predicts weaker size structure than observed in many real food webs. I introduce a modified version of the niche model which allows to control the strength of size-dependence of predator-prey links. In this model, optimal prey body mass depends allometrically on predator body mass and on a second trait, such as foraging mode. These empirically motivated extensions of the model allow to represent size structure of real food webs realistically and can be used to generate artificial food webs varying in several aspects of size structure in a controlled way. Hence, by explicitly including the role of species traits, this model provides new opportunities for simulating the consequences of size structure for food web dynamics and stability.

Departmemt of Fish Ecology and Evolution Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Kastanienbaum Switzerland; Laboratory of Theoretical Ecology Institute of Entomology Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic České Budějovice Czech Republic; Department of Ecosystems Biology Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia České Budějovice Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Elton CS (1927) Animal Ecology. New York, 397 USA: Macmillan Co.

de Ruiter PC, Neutel AM, Moore JC (1995) Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 269: 1257–1260. PubMed

McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798.

Neutel AM, Heesterbeek JAP, de Ruiter PC (2002) Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science 296: 1120–1123. PubMed

Warren PH, Lawton JH (1987) Invertebrate predator-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia 74: 231–235. PubMed

Cohen JE, Pimm SL, Yodzis P, Saldana J (1993) Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 62: 67–78.

Woodward G, Ebenman B, Emmerson M, Montoya JM, Olesen JM, et al. (2005) Body size in ecological networks. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 402–409. PubMed

Brose U, Jonsson T, Berlow EL, Warren P, Banasek-Richter C, et al. (2006) Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. Ecology 87: 2411–2417. PubMed

Bersier LF, Kehrli P (2008) The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food-web structure. Ecological Complexity 5: 132–139.

Naisbit RE, Kehrli P, Rohr RP, Bersier LF (2011) Phylogenetic signal in predator-prey body-size relationships. Ecology 92: 2183–2189. PubMed

Riede JO, Brose U, Ebenman B, Jacob U, Thompson R, et al. (2011) Stepping in Elton's footprints: A general scaling model for body masses and trophic levels across ecosystems. Ecology Letters 14: 169–178. PubMed

Naisbit RE, Rohr RP, Rossberg AG, Kehrli P, Bersier LF (2012) Phylogeny versus body size as determinants of food web structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 3291–3297. PubMed PMC

Brose U, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2006) Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. Ecology Letters 9: 1228–1236. PubMed

Heckmann L, Drossel B, Brose U, Guill C (2012) Interactive effects of body-size structure and adaptive foraging on food-web stability. Ecology Letters 15: 243–250. PubMed

Beckerman AP, Petchey OL, Warren PH (2006) Foraging biology predicts food web complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 13745–13749. PubMed PMC

Petchey OL, Beckerman AP, Riede JO, Warren PH (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 4191–4196. PubMed PMC

Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2000) Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404: 180–183. PubMed

Stouffer DB, Camacho J, Amaral LAN (2006) A robust measure of food web intervality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103: 19015–19020. PubMed PMC

Allesina S, Alonso D, Pascual M (2008) A general model for food web structure. Science 320: 658–661. PubMed

Williams RJ, Anandanadesan A, Purves D (2010) The probabilistic niche model reveals the niche structure and role of body size in a complex food web. PLoS ONE 5: e12092. PubMed PMC

Stouffer DB, Rezende EL, Amaral LAN (2011) The role of body mass in diet contiguity and food-web structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 80: 632–639. PubMed PMC

Zook AE, Eklof A, Jacob U, Allesina S (2011) Food webs: Ordering species according to body size yields high degree of intervality. Journal of Theoretical Biology 271: 106–113. PubMed

Williams RJ, Purves DW (2011) The probabilistic niche model reveals substantial variation in the niche structure of empirical food webs. Ecology 92: 1849–1857. PubMed

Stouffer DB, Camacho J, Jiang W, Amaral LAN (2007) Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 1931–1940. PubMed PMC

Rohr RP, Scherer H, Kehrli P, Mazza C, Bersier LF (2010) Modeling food webs: exploring unexplained structure using latent traits. American Naturalist 176: 170–177. PubMed

Wirtz KW (2012) Who is eating whom? morphology and feeding type determine the size relation between planktonic predators and their ideal prey. Marine Ecology Progress Series 445: 1–12.

Klecka J, Boukal DS (2013) Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study. Journal of Animal Ecology 82: 1031–1041. PubMed

Rossberg AG, Brännström Å, Dieckmann U (2010) How trophic interaction strength depends on traits. Theoretical Ecology 3: 13–24.

Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2008) Success and its limits among structural models of complex food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 512–519. PubMed

Kondoh M (2003) Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 299: 1388–1391. PubMed

Berec L, Eisner J, Křivan V (2010) Adaptive foraging does not always lead to more complex food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 266: 211–218. PubMed

Jordano P, Bascompte J, Olesen JM (2003) Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecology Letters 6: 69–81.

Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Elberling H, Rasmussen C, et al. (2011) Missing and forbidden links in mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278: 725–732. PubMed PMC

Trautmann H, Steuer D, Mersmann O, Bornkamp B (2012) truncnorm: Truncated normal distribution.

R Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81: 259–291. PubMed

Warton DI, Duursma RA, Falster DS, Taskinen S (2012) smatr 3 - an r package for estimation and inference about allometric lines. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 257–259.

Petchey OL, Beckerman AP, Riede JO, Warren PH (2011) Fit, efficiency, and biology: Some thoughts on judging food web models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 279: 169–171. PubMed

Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters 5: 558–567.

Woodward G, Warren PH (2007) Body size and predatory interactions in freshwaters: Scaling from individuals to communities. Body Size: The Structure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems: 98–117.

Woodward G, Blanchard J, Lauridsen RB, Edwards FK, Jones JI, et al. (2010) Individual-based food webs: Species identity, body size and sampling effects. Advances in Ecological Research 43: 211–266.

Melián CJ, Vilas C, Baldó F, González-Ortegón E, Drake P, et al. (2011) Eco-evolutionary dynamics of individual-based food webs. Advances in Ecological Research 45: 225–268.

Schmid-Araya JM, Schmid PE, Robertson A, Winterbottom J, Gjerløv C, et al. (2002) Connectance in stream food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 1056–1062.

Montoya JM, Solé RV (2003) Topological properties of food webs: from real data to community assembly models. Oikos 102: 614–622.

Riede JO, Rall BC, Banasek-Richter C, Navarrete SA, Wieters EA, et al. (2010) Scaling of food-web properties with diversity and complexity across ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 42: 139–170.

Allesina S (2011) Predicting trophic relations in ecological networks: a test of the allometric diet breadth model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 279: 161–168. PubMed

Goldwasser L, Roughgarden J (1993) Construction and analysis of a large caribbean food web. Ecology 74: 1216–1233.

Bersier LF, Dixon P, Sugihara G (1999) Scale-invariant or scale-dependent behavior of the link density property in food webs: A matter of sampling effort? American Naturalist 153: 676–682. PubMed

Klecka J, Boukal DS (2011) Lazy ecologist's guide to water beetle diversity: Which sampling methods are the best? Ecological Indicators 11: 500–508.

Hamley JM (1975) Review of gillnet selectivity. Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 32: 1943–1969.

Harley SJ, Myers RA (2001) Hierarchical bayesian models of length-specific catchability of research trawl surveys. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1569–1584.

Jennings S, Dulvy NK (2005) Reference points and reference directions for size-based indicators of community structure. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 62: 397–404.

Mommertz S, Schauer C, Kosters N, Lang A, Filser J (1996) A comparison of d-vac suction, fenced and unfenced pitfall trap sampling of epigeal arthropods in agro-ecosystems. Annales Zoologici Fennici 33: 117–124.

Lang A (2000) The pitfalls of pitfalls: a comparison of pitfall trap catches and absolute density estimates of epigeal invertebrate predators in arable land. Journal of Pest Science 73: 99–106.

Sanders D, Entling MH (2011) Large variation of suction sampling efficiency depending on arthro-pod groups, species traits, and habitat properties. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 138: 234–243.

Stouffer DB, Camacho J, Guimera R, Ng CA, Amaral LAN (2005) Quantitative patterns in the structure of model and empirical food webs. Ecology 86: 1301–1311.

Rossberg AG, Matsuda H, Amemiya T, Itoh K (2006) Food webs: Experts consuming families of experts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 241: 552–563. PubMed