Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: updated results from the phase III HannaH study
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25403587
DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdu524
PII: S0923-7534(19)31376-6
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- HER2/neu, breast cancer, chemotherapy, neoadjuvant, subcutaneous, trastuzumab,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Injections, Subcutaneous MeSH
- Infusions, Intravenous MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms drug therapy genetics MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage adverse effects pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 biosynthesis genetics MeSH
- Trastuzumab administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
- Receptor, ErbB-2 MeSH
- Trastuzumab MeSH
BACKGROUND: HannaH (NCT00950300) was a phase III, randomized, international, open-label study that compared pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of two different trastuzumab formulations [subcutaneous (s.c.) and intravenous (i.v.)] in HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory breast cancer in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting. The co-primary end points, to show noninferiority of s.c. versus i.v. trastuzumab in terms of serum concentration (Ctrough) and pathologic complete response (pCR) were met; safety profiles were comparable at 12 months' median follow-up. Secondary end points included safety and tolerability, PK profile, immunogenicity, and event-free survival (EFS). We now report updated safety and efficacy data after a median follow-up of 20 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 596) were treated with eight cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, administered concurrently with 3-weekly s.c. trastuzumab (fixed dose of 600 mg) or the standard weight-based i.v. method. Following surgery, patients continued trastuzumab treatment to complete 1 year of therapy. Updated analyses of PK, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were carried out. RESULTS: s.c. trastuzumab was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events (AEs), including grade 3 or 4 AEs, between treatment groups was comparable. A slightly higher incidence of serious AEs (SAEs), mainly due to infections, was reported with s.c. treatment {64 [21.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.0%-26.7%] versus 42 (14.1%; 95% CI 10.4%-18.6%) in the i.v. group}; however, the differences were small and often based on rare events, with no observable pattern across reported events. An early analysis of EFS showed rates of 95% in both groups 1 year postrandomization. Exploratory analyses did not reveal an association between toxicity and body weight or exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the safety profile of s.c. trastuzumab was consistent with the previously published data from HannaH and the known safety profile of i.v. trastuzumab. EFS rates were comparable between the i.v. and s.c. groups. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00950300.
BioAnalytical Sciences Genentech South San Francisco USA
Chemotherapeutic Department City Clinical Oncology Hospital 62 Moscow Russia
Chemotherapy Oncology CHU Jean Minjoz Besançon France
Department of Biopharmaceuticals F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland
Department of Oncology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Korea
Department of Surgery NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology St Petersburg Russia
References provided by Crossref.org