Omission of dacarbazine or bleomycin, or both, from the ABVD regimen in treatment of early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma (GHSG HD13): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25539730
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61469-0
PII: S0140-6736(14)61469-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bleomycin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dakarbazin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- doxorubicin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- Hodgkinova nemoc farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vinblastin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bleomycin MeSH
- dakarbazin MeSH
- doxorubicin MeSH
- vinblastin MeSH
BACKGROUND: The role of bleomycin and dacarbazine in the ABVD regimen (ie, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) has been questioned, especially for treatment of early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma, because of the drugs' toxicity. We aimed to investigate whether omission of either bleomycin or dacarbazine, or both, from ABVD reduced the efficacy of this regimen in treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multicentre trial (HD13) we compared two cycles of ABVD with two cycles of the reduced-intensity regimen variants ABV (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine), AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), and AV (doxorubicin and vinblastine), in patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven, classic or nodular, lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma. In each treatment group, 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) was given after both cycles of chemotherapy were completed. From Jan 28, 2003, patients were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) with a minimisation method to the four groups. Because of high event rates, assignment to the AV and ABV groups stopped early, on Sept 30, 2005, and Feb 10, 2006; assignment to ABVD and AVD continued (1:1) until Sept 30, 2009. Our primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the experimental variants compared with ABVD in terms of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF), by excluding a difference of 6% after 5 years corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.72, via a 95% CI. Analyses reported here include qualified patients only, and between-group comparisons include only patients recruited during the same period. The trial was registered, number ISRCTN63474366. FINDINGS: Of 1502 qualified patients, 566, 198, 571, and 167 were randomly assigned to receive ABVD, ABV, AVD, or AV, respectively. 5 year FFTF was 93.1%, 81.4%, 89.2%, and 77.1% with ABVD, ABV, AVD, and AV, respectively. Compared with ABVD, inferiority of the dacarbazine-deleted variants was detected with 5 year differences of -11.5% (95% CI -18.3 to -4.7; HR 2.06 [1.21 to 3.52]) for ABV and -15.2% (-23.0 to -7.4; HR 2.57 [1.51 to 4.40]) for AV. Non-inferiority of AVD compared with ABVD could also not be detected (5 year difference -3.9%, -7.7 to -0·1; HR 1.50, 1.00 to 2.26). 178 (33%) of 544 patients given ABVD had WHO grade III or IV toxicity, compared with 53 (28%) of 187 given ABV, 142 (26%) of 539 given AVD, and 40 (26%) of 151 given AV. Leucopenia was the most common event, and highest in the groups given bleomycin. INTERPRETATION: Dacarbazine cannot be omitted from ABVD without a substantial loss of efficacy. With respect to our predefined non-inferiority margin, bleomycin cannot be safely omitted either, and the standard of care for patients with early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma should remain ABVD followed by IFRT. FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe and Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research.
3rd Medical Department Paracelcus Medical University Salzburg Austria
Berlin Reference Center for Lymphoma and Haematopathology Berlin Germany
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum Berlin Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 1 University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 5 Haematology Oncology University of Erlangen Germany
Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
Katholisches Krankenhaus Hagen Germany
Klinik für Onkologie Katharinenhospital Stuttgart Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg Nürnberg Germany
Medizinische Klinik Hämatologie Onkologie Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hamm Germany
Medizinische Klinik Krankenanstalt Mutterhaus d Borromäerinnen Trier Germany
Medizinische Klinik Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Germany
Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinik Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinik Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
University Hospital Münster Münster Germany
University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
VU University Medical Center Amsterdam Netherlands
Zentrum für Innere Medizin Hämatologie Onkologie Charité Campus Mitte Berlin Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ISRCTN
ISRCTN63474366