Nivolumab for Newly Diagnosed Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: Safety and Efficacy in the Phase II CheckMate 205 Study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
P30 CA016672
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA161026
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
31112476
PubMed Central
PMC6688776
DOI
10.1200/jco.19.00315
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hodgkin Disease drug therapy MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Nivolumab pharmacology therapeutic use MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological pharmacology therapeutic use MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Nivolumab MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological MeSH
PURPOSE: Nivolumab, an anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated frequent and durable responses in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We report results from Cohort D of the CheckMate 205 trial, which assessed nivolumab monotherapy followed by nivolumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) for newly diagnosed cHL. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age or older with untreated, advanced-stage (defined as III to IV and IIB with unfavorable risk factors) cHL were eligible for Cohort D of this multicenter, noncomparative, phase II trial. Patients received nivolumab monotherapy for four doses, followed by 12 doses of N-AVD; all doses were every 2 weeks, and nivolumab was administered at 240 mg intravenously. The primary end point was safety. Efficacy end points included objective response rate and modified progression-free survival, defined as time to disease progression/relapse, death, or next therapy. Chromosome 9p24.1 alterations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression were assessed in Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg cells in evaluable patients. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled and treated. At diagnosis, 49% of patients had an International Prognostic Score of 3 or greater. Overall, 59% experienced a grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event. Treatment-related febrile neutropenia was reported in 10% of patients. Endocrine immune-mediated adverse events were all grade 1 to 2 and did not require high-dose corticosteroids; all nonendocrine immune-mediated adverse events resolved (most commonly, rash; 5.9%). At the end of therapy, the objective response rate (95% CI) per independent radiology review committee was 84% (71% to 93%), with 67% (52% to 79%), achieving complete remission (five patients [10%] were nonevaluable and counted as nonresponders). With a minimum follow-up of 9.4 months, 9-month modified progression-free survival was 92%. Patients with higher-level Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg programmed death-ligand 1 expression had more favorable responses to N-AVD (P = .041). CONCLUSION: Nivolumab followed by N-AVD was associated with promising efficacy and safety profiles for newly diagnosed, advanced-stage cHL.
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Detroit MI
Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston MA
Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ
British Columbia Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Charles University Prague and General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic
Costa del Sol Hospital Marbella Spain and Institute of Biomedical Research in Málaga Málaga Spain
Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA
Hospital Duran i Reynals Barcelona Spain
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Madrid Spain
Innsbruck University Hospital Innsbruck Austria
John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack Meridian Health Hackensack NJ
Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
OncoTyrol Center of Personalized Cancer Medicine Innsbruck Austria
University of Tennessee Knoxville TN
See more in PubMed
Duggan DB, Petroni GR, Johnson JL, et al. Randomized comparison of ABVD and MOPP/ABV hybrid for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease: Report of an intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:607–614. PubMed
Gordon LI, Hong F, Fisher RI, et al. Randomized phase III trial of ABVD versus Stanford V with or without radiation therapy in locally extensive and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: An intergroup study coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2496) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:684–691. PubMed PMC
Engert A, Diehl V, Franklin J, et al. Escalated-dose BEACOPP in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: 10 years of follow-up of the GHSG HD9 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4548–4554. PubMed
Allen PB, Gordon LI. Frontline therapy for classical Hodgkin lymphoma by stage and prognostic factors. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2017;11:1179554917731072. PubMed PMC
Meyer RM, Gospodarowicz MK, Connors JM, et al. ABVD alone versus radiation-based therapy in limited-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:399–408. PubMed PMC
André MPE, Girinsky T, Federico M, et al. Early positron emission tomography response-adapted treatment in stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma: Final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1786–1794. PubMed
Roemer MG, Advani RH, Ligon AH, et al. PD-L1 and PD-L2 genetic alterations define classical Hodgkin lymphoma and predict outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2690–2697. PubMed PMC
Roemer MGM, Redd RA, Cader FZ, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class II and programmed death ligand 1 expression predict outcome after programmed death 1 blockade in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:942–950. PubMed PMC
Armand P, Engert A, Younes A, et al. Nivolumab for relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation: Extended follow-up of the multicohort single-arm phase II CheckMate 205 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1428–1439. PubMed PMC
Herrera AF, Moskowitz AJ, Bartlett NL, et al. Interim results of brentuximab vedotin in combination with nivolumab in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2018;131:1183–1194. PubMed PMC
Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Smith P, et al. Myocardial infarction mortality risk after treatment for Hodgkin disease: A collaborative British cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:206–214. PubMed
Aleman BM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, De Bruin ML, et al. Late cardiotoxicity after treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2007;109:1878–1886. PubMed
Evens AM, Hong F, Gordon LI, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine and Stanford V in older Hodgkin lymphoma patients: A comprehensive analysis from the North American intergroup trial E2496. Br J Haematol. 2013;161:76–86. PubMed PMC
Böll B, Görgen H, Fuchs M, et al. ABVD in older patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10 and HD11 trials. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1522–1529. PubMed
Wongso D, Fuchs M, Plütschow A, et al. Treatment-related mortality in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: An analysis of the German Hodgkin study group. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2819–2824. PubMed
Johnson P, Federico M, Kirkwood A, et al. Adapted treatment guided by interim PET-CT scan in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2419–2429. PubMed PMC
Gallamini A, Hutchings M, Rigacci L, et al. Early interim 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is prognostically superior to International Prognostic Score in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A report from a joint Italian-Danish study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3746–3752. PubMed
Press OW, Li H, Schöder H, et al. US intergroup trial of response-adapted therapy for stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma using early interim fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2020–2027. PubMed PMC
Gallamini A, Patti C, Viviani S, et al. Early chemotherapy intensification with BEACOPP in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients with a interim-PET positive after two ABVD courses. Br J Haematol. 2011;152:551–560. PubMed
Trotman J, Fosså A, Federico M, et al. Response-adjusted therapy for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (RATHL) trial: Longer follow up confirms efficacy of de-escalation after a negative interim PET scan (CRUK/07/033) Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:65–67.
Connors JM, Jurczak W, Straus DJ, et al. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III or IV Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:331–344. PubMed PMC
Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, et al. Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1630–1636. PubMed
Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–586. PubMed
Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, et al. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin’s lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:203–212. PubMed
Federico M, Luminari S, Iannitto E, et al. ABVD compared with BEACOPP compared with CEC for the initial treatment of patients with advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Results from the HD2000 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Linfomi trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:805–811. PubMed
Behringer K, Goergen H, Hitz F, et al. Omission of dacarbazine or bleomycin, or both, from the ABVD regimen in treatment of early-stage favourable Hodgkin’s lymphoma (GHSG HD13): An open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1418–1427. PubMed
Martin WG, Ristow KM, Habermann TM, et al. Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity has a negative impact on the outcome of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7614–7620. PubMed
Willenbacher W, Mumm A, Bartsch HH. Late pulmonary toxicity of bleomycin. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3205. PubMed
Noone AM, Howlader N, Krapcho M, et al. (eds): SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2015. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2018. https://seer.cancer.gov/archive/csr/1975_2015/
National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Hodgkin lymphoma. V3.2018. Fort Washington, PA, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hodgkins.pdf.
Evens AM, Advani RH, Helenowski IB, et al: Multicenter phase II study of sequential brentuximab vedotin and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy for older patients with untreated classical Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0139 [epub ahead of print on September 4, 2018] PubMed
Stephens DM, Li H, Schoder H, et al: Long-term follow-up of SWOG S0816: Response-adapted therapy for stage III/IV Hodgkin Lymphoma demonstrates limitations of PET-adapted approach. Presented at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, San Diego, December 1-4, 2018.
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: The Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–3068. PubMed PMC
Cheson BD, Ansell S, Schwartz L, et al. Refinement of the Lugano classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. Blood. 2016;128:2489–2496. PubMed
Toxicity of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hematological Malignancies
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02181738