Prosocial behavior and gender

. 2015 ; 9 () : 88. [epub] 20150414

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid25926783

This study revisits different experimental data sets that explore social behavior in economic games and uncovers that many treatment effects may be gender-specific. In general, men and women do not differ in "neutral" baselines. However, we find that social framing tends to reinforce prosocial behavior in women but not men, whereas encouraging reflection decreases the prosociality of males but not females. The treatment effects are sometimes statistically different across genders and sometimes not but never go in the opposite direction. These findings suggest that (i) the social behavior of both sexes is malleable but each gender responds to different aspects of the social context; and (ii) gender differences observed in some studies might be the result of particular features of the experimental design. Our results contribute to the literature on prosocial behavior and may improve our understanding of the origins of human prosociality. We discuss the possible link between the observed differential treatment effects across genders and the differing male and female brain network connectivity, documented in recent neural studies.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Angrist J. D., Pischke J. S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bassett D. S., Gazzaniga M. S. (2011). Understanding complexity in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 200–209. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006 PubMed DOI PMC

Bassett D. S., Greenfield D. L., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Weinberger D. R., Moore S. W., Bullmore E. T. (2010). Efficient physical embedding of topologically complex information processing networks in brains and computer circuits. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6:e1000748. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000748 PubMed DOI PMC

Biswal B. B., Mennes M., Zuo X. N., Gohel S., Kelly C., Smith S. M., et al. . (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 4734–4739. 10.1073/pnas.0911855107 PubMed DOI PMC

Bohnet I., Frey B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 89, 335–339 10.1257/aer.89.1.335 DOI

Brañas-Garza P. (2006). Poverty in dictator games: awakening solidarity. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 60, 306–320 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.10.005 DOI

Brañas-Garza P., Cobo-Reyes R., Espinosa M. P., Jiménez N., Kovářík J., Ponti G. (2010). Altruism and social integration. Games Econ. Behav. 69, 249–257 10.1016/j.geb.2009.10.014 DOI

Brañas-Garza P., Durán M. A., Espinosa M. P. (2012). Favouring friends. Bull. Econ. Res. 64, 172–178 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00357.x DOI

Brañas-Garza P., Kovářík J., Neyse L. (2013). Second-to-fourth digit ratio has a non-monotonic impact on altruism. PLoS One 8:e60419. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060419 PubMed DOI PMC

Brody L. R., Hall J. A. (1993). “Gender and emotion,” in Handbook of Emotions, eds Lewis M., Haviland J. M. (New York: Guilford Press; ), 447–460.

Bullmore E., Sporns O. (2012). The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 336–349. 10.1038/nrn3214 PubMed DOI

Cacioppo J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole and vice versa. Am. Psychol. 57, 819–831. 10.1037/0003-066x.57.11.819 PubMed DOI

Cahill L. (2014). Fundamental sex differences in human brain architecture. Commentary. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 111, 577–578. 10.1073/pnas.1320954111 PubMed DOI PMC

Camerer C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Carpenter J., Burks S., Verhoogen E. (2003). “Comparing students to workers: the effects of social framing on behavior in distribution games,” in Research in Experimental Economics (Vol. 10), eds Carpenter J. P., Harrison G., List J. (Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier; ).

Chaudhuri A. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp. Econ. 14, 47–83 10.1007/s10683-010-9257-1 DOI

Croson R., Gneezy U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 448–474 10.1257/jel.47.2.448 DOI

Dennis E. L., Jahanshad N., McMahon K. L., de Zubicaray G. I., Martin N. G., Hickie I. B., et al. . (2013). Development of brain structural connectivity between ages 12 and 30: a 4-Tesla diffusion imaging study in 439 adolescents and adults. Neuroimage 64, 671–684. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.004 PubMed DOI PMC

de Vries G. J., Södersten P. (2009). Sex differences in the brain: the relation between structure and function. Horm. Behav. 55, 589–596. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.03.012 PubMed DOI PMC

Dreber A., Ellingsen T., Johannesson M., Rand D. G. (2013). Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games. Exp. Econ. 16, 349–371 10.1007/s10683-012-9341-9 DOI

Eagly A. H. (2013). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Psychology Press.

Eckel C. C., Grossman P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econ. Behav. 16, 181–191 10.1006/game.1996.0081 DOI

Ellingsen T., Johannesson M., Mollerstrom J., Munkhammar S. (2012). Social framing effects: preferences or beliefs? Games Econ. Behav. 76, 117–130 10.1016/j.geb.2012.05.007 DOI

Ellingsen T., Johannesson M., Mollerstrom J., Munkhammar S. (2013). Gender differences in social framing effects. Econ. Lett. 118, 470–472 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.010 DOI

Engel C. (2011). Dictator games: a meta study. Exp. Econ. 14, 583–610 10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7 DOI

Fehr E., Fischbacher U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791. 10.1038/nature02043 PubMed DOI

Glimcher P. W., Fehr E. (eds) (2013). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the Brain. Amsterdam, MA: Academic Press.

Gong G., Rosa-Neto P., Carbonell F., Chen Z. J., He Y., Evans A. C. (2009). Age-and gender-related differences in the cortical anatomical network. J. Neurosci. 29, 15684–15693. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2308-09.2009 PubMed DOI PMC

Grimm V., Mengel F. (2011). Let me sleep on it: delay reduces rejection rates in ultimatum games. Econ. Lett. 111, 113–115 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.01.025 DOI

Gross J. J., John O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships and well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 348–362. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 PubMed DOI

Gur R. C., Richard J., Calkins M. E., Chiavacci R., Hansen J. A., Bilker W. B., et al. . (2012). Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8–21. Neuropsychology 26, 251–265. 10.1037/a0026712 PubMed DOI PMC

Güth W., Kocher M. G. (2014). More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: motives, variations and a survey of the recent literature. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 108, 396–409 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006 DOI

Hagmann P. (2005). From Diffusion MRI to Brain Connectomics (Thesis). Lausanne: EPFL.

Han S., Northoff G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 646–654. 10.1038/nrn2456 PubMed DOI

Hoffman E., McCabe K., Smith V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 653–660.

Ingalhalikar M., Smith A., Parker D., Satterthwaite T., Elliott M., Ruparel K., et al. . (2014). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 111, 823–828. 10.1073/pnas.1316909110 PubMed DOI PMC

Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.

McManis M. H., Bradley M. M., Berg W. K., Cuthbert B. N., Lang P. J. (2001). Emotional reactions in children: verbal, physiological and behavioral responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology 38, 222–231. 10.1111/1469-8986.3820222 PubMed DOI

McRae K., Ochsner K. N., Mauss I. B., Gabrieli J. J., Gross J. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation: an fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 11, 143–162 10.1177/1368430207088035 PubMed DOI PMC

Miller L., Ubeda P. (2012). Are women more sensitive to the decision-making context? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83, 98–104 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.014 DOI

Niven J. E., Laughlin S. B. (2008). Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J. Exp. Bio. 211, 1792–1804. 10.1242/jeb.017574 PubMed DOI

Rand D. G. (2012). The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. J. Theor. Bio. 299, 172–179. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004 PubMed DOI

Rand D. G., Greene J. D., Nowak M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489, 427–430. 10.1038/nature11467 PubMed DOI

Rand D. G., Nowak M. A. (2013). Human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 413–425. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003 PubMed DOI

Rand D. G., Peysakhovich A., Kraft-Todd G. T., Newman G. E., Wurzbacher O., Nowak M. A., et al. . (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat. Commun. 5:3677. 10.1038/ncomms4677 PubMed DOI

Roalf D. R., Gur R. E., Ruparel K., Calkins M. E., Satterthwaite T. D., Bilker W. B., et al. . (2014). Within-individual variability in neurocognitive performance: sex and age-related differences in youths from ages 8 to 21. Neuropsychology 28, 506–518. 10.1037/neu0000067 PubMed DOI PMC

Rubinstein A. (2007). Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: a study of response times. Econ. J. 117, 1243–1259 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02081.x DOI

Satterthwaite T. D., Wolf D. H., Roalf D. R., Ruparel K., Erus G., Vandekar S., et al. . (2014). Linked sex differences in cognition and functional connectivity in youth. Cereb. Cortex [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1093/cercor/bhu036 PubMed DOI PMC

Singer T., Seymour B., O’Doherty J. P., Stephan K. E., Dolan R. J., Frith C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439, 466–469. 10.1038/nature04271 PubMed DOI PMC

Sporns O., Honey C. J., Kötter R. (2007). Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS One 2:e1049. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001049 PubMed DOI PMC

Tomasi D., Volkow N. D. (2012). Laterality patterns of brain functional connectivity: gender effects. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1455–1462. 10.1093/cercor/bhr230 PubMed DOI PMC

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

Hyper-altruistic behavior vanishes with high stakes

. 2021 ; 16 (8) : e0255668. [epub] 20210825

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...