HIV resistance testing and detected drug resistance in Europe
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- genotyp MeSH
- HIV infekce farmakoterapie MeSH
- HIV-1 genetika MeSH
- inhibitory HIV-proteasy terapeutické užití MeSH
- inhibitory reverzní transkriptasy terapeutické užití MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- látky proti HIV terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- logistické modely MeSH
- multivariační analýza MeSH
- neúspěšná terapie MeSH
- počet CD4 lymfocytů MeSH
- virová léková rezistence genetika MeSH
- virová nálož účinky léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- inhibitory HIV-proteasy MeSH
- inhibitory reverzní transkriptasy MeSH
- látky proti HIV MeSH
OBJECTIVES: To describe regional differences and trends in resistance testing among individuals experiencing virological failure and the prevalence of detected resistance among those individuals who had a genotypic resistance test done following virological failure. DESIGN: Multinational cohort study. METHODS: Individuals in EuroSIDA with virological failure (>1 RNA measurement >500 on ART after >6 months on ART) after 1997 were included. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for resistance testing following virological failure and aORs for the detection of resistance among those who had a test were calculated using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Compared to 74.2% of ART-experienced individuals in 1997, only 5.1% showed evidence of virological failure in 2012. The odds of resistance testing declined after 2004 (global P < 0.001). Resistance was detected in 77.9% of the tests, NRTI resistance being most common (70.3%), followed by NNRTI (51.6%) and protease inhibitor (46.1%) resistance. The odds of detecting resistance were lower in tests done in 1997-1998, 1999-2000 and 2009-2010, compared to those carried out in 2003-2004 (global P < 0.001). Resistance testing was less common in Eastern Europe [aOR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.94] compared to Southern Europe, whereas the detection of resistance given that a test was done was less common in Northern (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.21-0.39) and Central Eastern (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.76) Europe, compared to Southern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a concurrent decline in virological failure and testing, drug resistance was commonly detected. This suggests a selective approach to resistance testing. The regional differences identified indicate that policy aiming to minimize the emergence of resistance is of particular relevance in some European regions, notably in the countries in Eastern Europe.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org