Attachment theorists believe that children rely on their caregivers for protection and exploration. Due to this emphasis on independent exploration, however, the extent to which this notion of secure-base behavior is valid in societies emphasizing belongingness, such as Japan, has been questioned. By conducting an in-depth exploration of two Japanese collectivistic concepts, amae and ie, the present paper reexamines the relevance of secure-base behavior in Japan. Current discussions of amae have relied on psychoanalytic concepts that were developed in Western culture, and thus may not accurately represent Japanese parent-child relations. By examining another traditional concept of the family system, ie, this paper proposes that attachment theory is relevant in Japanese culture because children's individual competence is important to their families.

Department of Religious Studies University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA

Institute for Research on Children Youth and Family Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Joštova 10 Brno 602 00 The Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Am Psychol. 1979 Oct;34(10):932-7 PubMed

Child Dev. 1992 Aug;63(4):808-21 PubMed

Child Dev. 1981 Sep;52(3):833-8 PubMed

Int J Psychol. 2011 Oct;46(5):368-76 PubMed

Child Dev. 1979 Sep;50(3):821-9 PubMed

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):276-97 PubMed

Am Psychol. 2000 Oct;55(10):1093-104 PubMed

Child Dev. 1970 Mar;41(1):49-67 PubMed

Science. 1986 Feb 14;231(4739):693-9 PubMed

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):233-56 PubMed

Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):3-72 PubMed

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):228-49 PubMed

Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):164-72 PubMed

Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1985;50(1-2):257-75 PubMed