Expression of Emotional Arousal in Two Different Piglet Call Types

. 2015 ; 10 (8) : e0135414. [epub] 20150814

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26274816

Humans as well as many animal species reveal their emotional state in their voice. Vocal features show strikingly similar correlation patterns with emotional states across mammalian species, suggesting that the vocal expression of emotion follows highly conserved signalling rules. To fully understand the principles of emotional signalling in mammals it is, however, necessary to also account for any inconsistencies in the way that they are acoustically encoded. Here we investigate whether the expression of emotions differs between call types produced by the same species. We compare the acoustic structure of two common piglet calls-the scream (a distress call) and the grunt (a contact call)-across three levels of arousal in a negative situation. We find that while the central frequency of calls increases with arousal in both call types, the amplitude and tonal quality (harmonic-to-noise ratio) show contrasting patterns: as arousal increased, the intensity also increased in screams, but not in grunts, while the harmonicity increased in screams but decreased in grunts. Our results suggest that the expression of arousal depends on the function and acoustic specificity of the call type. The fact that more vocal features varied with arousal in scream calls than in grunts is consistent with the idea that distress calls have evolved to convey information about emotional arousal.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Darwin C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals London: John Murray; 1872.

Panksepp J. The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: do animals have affective lives? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35: 1791–1804. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.08.003 PubMed DOI

Mateo JM. Alarm calls elicit predator-specific physiological responses. Biol Lett. 2010;6: 623–625. 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0118 PubMed DOI PMC

Briefer EF. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence. J Zool. 2012;288: 1–20. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00920.x DOI

Zimmermann E, Leliveld L, Schehka S. Toward the evolutionary roots of affective prosody in human acoustic communication: a comparative approach to mammalian voices In: Altenmüller E, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E, editors. The evolution of emotional communication: from sounds in nonhuman mammals to speech and music in man. Oxford University Press; 2013.

Mendl M, Burman OHP, Paul ES. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2010; 277: 2895–2904; 10.1098/rspb.2010.0303 PubMed DOI PMC

Titze IR. Principles of Voice Production National Center for Voice and Speech; 2000.

Taylor AM, Reby D. The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research. J Zool. 2010;280: 221–236. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00661.x DOI

Faragó T, Andics A, Devecseri V, Kis A, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á. Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biol Lett. 2014;10: 20130926 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0926 PubMed DOI PMC

Maruščáková IL, Linhart P, Ratcliffe VF, Tallet C, Reby D, Špinka M. Humans (Homo sapiens) judge the emotional content of piglet (Sus scrofa domestica) calls based on simple acoustic parameters, not personality, empathy, nor attitude toward animals. J Comp Psychol. 2015;129: 121–131. 10.1037/a0038870 PubMed DOI

Blumstein DT, Chi YY. Scared and Less Noisy: Glucocorticoids are associated with alarm call entropy. Biol Lett. 2012;8: 189–192. 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0832 PubMed DOI PMC

Esch HC, Sayigh LS, Blum JE, Wells RS. Whistles as potential indicators of stress in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Mammal. 2009;90: 638–650. 10.1644/08-MAMM-A-069R.1 DOI

Yin S, McCowan B. Barking in domestic dogs: context specificity and individual identification. Anim Behav. 2004;68: 343–355. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.07.016 DOI

Schrader L, Todt D. Vocal quality is correlated with levels of stress hormones in domestic pigs. Ethology. 1998;104: 859–876.

Weary DM, Fraser D. Calling by domestic piglets: reliable signals of need? Anim Behav. 1995;50: 1047–1055. 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80105-7 DOI

Puppe B, Schon P, Tuchscherer A, Manteuffel G. Castration-induced vocalisation in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: Complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2005;95: 67–78. 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.001 DOI

Stoeger AS, Charlton BD, Kratochvil H, Fitch WT. Vocal cues indicate level of arousal in infant African elephant roars. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130: 1700–1710. 10.1121/1.3605538 PubMed DOI

Morton ES. On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds. Am Nat. 1977;111: 855–869. 10.1086/283219 DOI

Rohleder N, Wolf JM, Maldonado EF, Kirschbaum C. The psychosocial stress-induced increase in salivary alpha-amylase is independent of saliva flow rate. Psychophysiology. 2006;43: 645–652. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00457.x PubMed DOI

Scherer KR. Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychol Bull. 1986;99: 143–165. 10.1037/0033-2909.99.2.143 PubMed DOI

Manser MB. The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;268: 2315–2324. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1773 PubMed DOI PMC

Tallet C, Linhart P, Policht R, Hammerschmidt K, Šimeček P, Kratinová P, et al. Encoding of situations in the vocal repertoire of piglets (Sus scrofa): a comparison of discrete and graded classifications. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e71841 10.1371/journal.pone.0071841 PubMed DOI PMC

Weary DM, Braithwaite LA, Fraser D. Vocal response to pain in piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;56: 161–172. 10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00092-0 DOI

Fitch WT. The phonetic potential of nonhuman vocal tracts: comparative cineradiographic observations of vocalizing animals. Phonetica. 2000;57: 205–218. doi:28474 PubMed

Reimert I, Rodenburg TB, Ursinus WW, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Selection based on indirect genetic effects for growth, environmental enrichment and coping style affect the immune status of pigs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e108700 10.1371/journal.pone.0108700 PubMed DOI PMC

Ruis MA, te Brake JH, van de Burgwal JA, de Jong IC, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. Personalities in female domesticated pigs: behavioural and physiological indications. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000;66: 31–47. 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00070-2 DOI

Hessing MJC, Hagelsø AM, van Beek JAM, Wiepkema RP, Schouten WGP, Krukow R. Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993;37: 285–295. 10.1016/0168-1591(93)90118-9 DOI

Geverink NA, Schouten WGP, Gort G, Wiegant VM. Individual differences in behavioral and physiological responses to restraint stress in pigs. Physiol Behav. 2002;77: 451–457. 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00877-6 PubMed DOI

Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev. 2003;110: 145–172. PubMed

Briefer EF, Tettamanti F, McElligott AG. Emotions in goats: mapping physiological, behavioural and vocal profiles. Anim Behav. 2015;99: 131–143. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.002 DOI

Specht R. Avisoft SASLab Pro, version 5.2.07. Berlin; 2013. Available: www.avisoft.com

Boersma P, Weenink D. PRAAT: Doing phonetcis by computer, version 5.3.48, retrieved 1 May 2013. 2013. Available: http://www.praat.org/

Boersma P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proc Inst Phon Sci. 1993;17: 97–110.

Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2013.

Hollén LI, Manser MB. Motivation before meaning: motivational information encoded in meerkat alarm calls develops earlier than referential information. Am Nat. 2007;169: 758–767. 10.1086/516719 PubMed DOI

Fichtel C, Hammerschmidt K, Jürgens U. On the vocal expression of emotion. A multi-parametric analysis of different states of aversion in the squirrel monkey. Behaviour. 2001;138: 97–116.

Sauter D, Eisner F, Calder AJ, Scott SK. Perceptual cues in nonverbal vocal expressions of emotion. Q J Exp Psychol. 2010;63: 2251–2272. PubMed PMC

Brumm H, Voss K, Kollmer I, Todt D. Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol. 2004;207: 443–448. 10.1242/jeb.00768 PubMed DOI

Berry DA, Herzel H, Titze IR, Story BH. Bifurcations in excised larynx experiments. J Voice. 1996;10: 129–138. 10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80039-7 PubMed DOI

Tokuda IT, Horácek J, Svec JG, Herzel H. Bifurcations and chaos in register transitions of excised larynx experiments. Chaos Woodbury N. 2008;18: 013102 10.1063/1.2825295 PubMed DOI

Illmann G, Hammerschmidt K, Špinka M, Tallet C. Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need? PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e83529 10.1371/journal.pone.0083529 PubMed DOI PMC

Owings DH, Morton ES. Animal vocal communication: a new approach Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

Lingle S, Wyman MT, Kotrba R, Teichroeb LJ, Romanow CA. What makes a cry a cry? A review of infant distress vocalizations. Curr Zool. 2012;58: 698–726.

Lingle S, Riede T. Deer mothers are sensitive to infant distress vocalizations of diverse mammalian species. Am Nat. 2014;184: 510–522. 10.1086/677677 PubMed DOI

August PV, Anderson JGT. Mammal sounds and motivation-structural rules: a test of the hypothesis. J Mammal. 1987;68: 1–9.

Altenmüller E, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E. A cross-taxa concept of emotion in acoustic communication: An ethological perspective In: Altenmüller E, Schmidt S, Zimmermann E, editors. The evolution of emotional communication: from sounds in nonhuman mammals to speech and music in man. Oxford University Press; 2013.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...