Panitumumab Use in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Patterns of KRAS Testing: Results from a Europe-Wide Physician Survey and Medical Records Review
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26491871
PubMed Central
PMC4619650
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0140717
PII: PONE-D-15-18163
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chorobopisy * MeSH
- demografie MeSH
- exony genetika MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- lékaři * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- panitumumab MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) genetika MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zdravotnické přehledy * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- KRAS protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- panitumumab MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) MeSH
BACKGROUND: From 2008-2013, the European indication for panitumumab required that patients' tumor KRAS exon 2 mutation status was known prior to starting treatment. To evaluate physician awareness of panitumumab prescribing information and how physicians prescribe panitumumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), two European multi-country, cross-sectional, observational studies were initiated in 2012: a physician survey and a medical records review. The first two out of three planned rounds for each study are reported. METHODS: The primary objective in the physician survey was to estimate the prevalence of KRAS testing, and in the medical records review, it was to evaluate the effect of test results on patterns of panitumumab use. The medical records review study also included a pathologists' survey. RESULTS: In the physician survey, nearly all oncologists (299/301) were aware of the correct panitumumab indication and the need to test patients' tumor KRAS status before treatment with panitumumab. Nearly all oncologists (283/301) had in the past 6 months of clinical practice administered panitumumab correctly to mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS status. In the medical records review, 97.5% of participating oncologists (77/79) conducted a KRAS test for all of their patients prior to prescribing panitumumab. Four patients (1.3%) did not have tumor KRAS mutation status tested prior to starting panitumumab treatment. Approximately one-quarter of patients (85/306) were treated with panitumumab and concurrent oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy; of these, 83/85 had confirmed wild-type KRAS status prior to starting panitumumab treatment. All 56 referred laboratories that participated used a Conformité Européenne-marked or otherwise validated KRAS detection method, and nearly all (55/56) participated in a quality assurance scheme. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high level of knowledge amongst oncologists around panitumumab prescribing information and the need to test and confirm patients' tumors as being wild-type KRAS prior to treatment with panitumumab, with or without concurrent oxaliplatin-containing therapy.
Gregorio Marañón Hospital Madrid Spain
Institute Sainte Catherine Avignon France
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, Hartmann JT, Aparicio J, et al. (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27: 663–671. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8397 PubMed DOI
Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S, Khayat D, Bleiberg H, et al. (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 337–345. PubMed
Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, et al. (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357: 2040–2048. PubMed
Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L, Scheithauer W, Abubakr YA, et al. (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 2311–2319. 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1193 PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E, Zaluski J, Chang Chien CR, et al. (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360: 1408–1417. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805019 PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, et al. (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 1658–1664. PubMed
Wilke H, Glynne-Jones R, Thaler J, Adenis A, Preusser P, et al. (2008) Cetuximab plus irinotecan in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan: MABEL Study. J Clin Oncol 26: 5335–5343. 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3758 PubMed DOI
Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, et al. (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 1626–1634. 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116 PubMed DOI
Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Zanon C, Moroni M, et al. (2007) Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res 67: 2643–2648. PubMed
De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, Janssens M, De Hertogh G, et al. (2008) KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol 19: 508–515. PubMed
Di Fiore F, Blanchard F, Charbonnier F, Le Pessot F, Lamy A, et al. (2007) Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 96: 1166–1169. PubMed PMC
Freeman DJ, Juan T, Reiner M, Hecht JR, Meropol NJ, et al. (2008) Association of K-ras mutational status and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab alone. Clin Colorectal Cancer 7: 184–190. 10.3816/CCC.2008.n.024 PubMed DOI
Jimeno A, Messersmith WA, Hirsch FR, Franklin WA, Eckhardt SG (2009) KRAS mutations and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer: practical application of patient selection. J Clin Oncol 27: 1130–1136. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8168 PubMed DOI
Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, et al. (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359: 1757–1765. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385 PubMed DOI
Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, et al. (2008) KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 26: 374–379. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906 PubMed DOI
Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, et al. (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28: 4697–4705. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4860 PubMed DOI
Peeters M, Price TJ, Cervantes A, Sobrero AF, Ducreux M, et al. (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28: 4706–4713. 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.6055 PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Cervantes A (2010) Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. Ann Oncol 21 Suppl 5: v93–v97. 10.1093/annonc/mdq222 PubMed DOI
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2009) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. http://wwwnccnorg/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/colonpdf. PubMed
Ciardiello F, Tejpar S, Normanno N, Mercadante D, Teague T, et al. (2011) Uptake of KRAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Europe, Latin America and Asia. Target Oncol 6: 133–145. 10.1007/s11523-011-0181-x PubMed DOI
Cox SL, Zlot AI, Silvey K, Elliott D, Horn T, et al. (2012) Patterns of cancer genetic testing: a randomized survey of Oregon clinicians. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012: 294730 10.1155/2012/294730 PubMed DOI PMC
Harris JN, Liljestrand P, Alexander GL, Goddard KA, Kauffman T, et al. (2013) Oncologists' attitudes toward KRAS testing: a multisite study. Cancer Med 2: 881–888. 10.1002/cam4.135 PubMed DOI PMC
Smith D, Rouyer M, Francois E, Mitry E, Monnereau A, et al. (2011) Use of cetuximab in a real-life setting in France with respect to KRAS status: Preliminary results of EREBUS cohort study. J Clin Oncol 29: Abstract e14094.
Webster J, Kauffman TL, Feigelson HS, Pawloski PA, Onitilo AA, et al. (2013) KRAS testing and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor treatment for colorectal cancer in community settings. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 22: 91–101. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0545 PubMed DOI PMC
Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P (2008) Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8: 38 10.1186/1472-6947-8-38 PubMed DOI PMC
Davis KJ, Landis SH, Oh YM, Mannino DM, Han MK, et al. (2015) Continuing to Confront COPD International Physician Survey: physician knowledge and application of COPD management guidelines in 12 countries. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 10: 39–55. 10.2147/COPD.S70162 PubMed DOI PMC
Lledo A, Dellva MA, Strombom IM, Wilkie JL, Jungemann ME, et al. (2007) Awareness of potential valvulopathy risk with pergolide and changes in clinical practice after label change: a survey among European neurologists. Eur J Neurol 14: 644–649. PubMed
Goldberg SL, Chen L, Guerin A, Macalalad AR, Liu N, et al. (2013) Association between molecular monitoring and long-term outcomes in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients treated with first line imatinib. Curr Med Res Opin 29: 1075–1082. 10.1185/03007995.2013.812034 PubMed DOI
Witjes JA, Palou J, Soloway M, Lamm D, Kamat AM, et al. (2013) Current clinical practice gaps in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with emphasis on the use of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG): results of an international individual patient data survey (IPDS). BJU Int 112: 742–750. 10.1111/bju.12012 PubMed DOI PMC
Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20: 61–67. PubMed