Effects of disturbance regime on carbohydrate reserves in meadow plants
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26507569
PubMed Central
PMC4670489
DOI
10.1093/aobpla/plv123
PII: plv123
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Carbohydrates, TNC concentration, TNC pool, management, meadow, storage organs,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Carbohydrate storage enables plants to tolerate both seasonally unfavourable conditions and recover from disturbance. Although short-term changes in storage levels due to disturbance are fairly well known, less is known about long-term changes in storage levels, especially in response to cessation of repeated disturbance. Additionally, whereas it is presumably the total amount (pool) of storage carbohydrate reserves that is of importance, typically carbohydrate concentrations are measured instead, as a proxy. We assessed changes in carbohydrate concentrations and pools in storage organs and changes in above- versus belowground biomass in response to mowing cessation in nine herbs from two meadows (dry and wet) at the (June) peak of vegetation development and the (October) growing season end 1 and 3 years after the change in the disturbance regime. We tested three hypotheses: (1) storage will increase with abandonment of mowing only in the first year after disturbance cessation, but not further increase subsequently, as high storage would hinder competitive ability; (2) storage will increase towards the end of the season in both disturbed and undisturbed plants; and (3) changes in carbohydrate concentrations are accurate predictors of changes in pools. Although species-specific changes in carbohydrate reserves occurred in the wet meadow, more general trends appeared in the dry meadow. There, plants accumulated higher carbohydrate reserves at the end of the season, especially in unmown plots. However, the reserves for plants in both disturbance regimes were the same at the growing season peak (June) in both examined years. The increase in storage of carbohydrates on unmown plots in October was manifested by increases of both storage organ biomass and carbohydrate concentration, whereas in mown plots, it was due only to increased carbohydrate concentration. Although concentrations and pools represent different aspects of plant carbohydrate economy, concentrations will represent short-term responses to changed disturbance regimes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Anderson NJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. 2008. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIME-E.
Baptist F, Secher-Fromell H, Viard-Cretat F, Aranjuelo I, Clement JC, Crème A, Desclos M, Laine P, Nogues S, Lavorel S. 2013. Carbohydrate and nitrogen stores in Festuca paniculata under mowing explain dominance in subalpine grasslands. Plant Biology 15:395–404. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00652.x PubMed DOI
Bartoš M, Janeček Š, Klimešová J. 2011. Effect of mowing and fertilization on biomass and carbohydrate reserves of Molinia caerulea at two organizational levels. Acta Oecologica 37:299–306. 10.1016/j.actao.2011.02.015 DOI
Bartušková A, Doležal J, Janeček Š, Lanta V, Klimešová J. 2015. Changes in biomass allocation in species rich meadow after abandonment: ecological strategy or allometry? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 17:379–387. 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.06.003 DOI
Chapin FS III, Schulze E, Mooney HA. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:423–447. 10.1146/annurev.es.21.110190.002231 DOI
Cooper CS, Watson CA. 1968. Total available carbohydrates in roots of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop.) and Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) when grown under several management regimes. Crop Science 8:83–85. 10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800010024x DOI
Corradini C, Cavazza A, Bignardi C. 2012. High-performance anion-exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed electrochemical detection as a powerful tool to evaluate carbohydrates of food Interest: principles and applications. International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry 2012:Article ID 487564.
de Bello F, Janeček Š, Lepš J, Doležal J, Macková J, Lanta V, Klimešová J. 2012. Different plant trait scaling in dry versus wet Central European meadows. Journal of Vegetation Science 23:709–720. 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01389.x DOI
Eek L, Zobel K. 2001. Structure and diversity of a species-rich grassland community, treated with additional illumination, fertilization and mowing. Ecography 24:157–164. 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240206.x DOI
Facelli JM, Pickett STA. 1991. Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. The Botanical Review 57:1–32. 10.1007/BF02858763 DOI
Gallagher JA, Volenec JJ, Turner LB, Pollock CJ. 1997. Starch hydrolytic enzyme activities following defoliation of white clover. Crop Science 37:1812–1818. 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060025x DOI
Hardy MR, Townsend RR. 1988. Separation of positional isomers of oligosaccharides and glycopeptides by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 85:3289–3293. 10.1073/pnas.85.10.3289 PubMed DOI PMC
Hassan BE, Krueger WC. 1980. Impact of intensity and season of grazing on carbohydrate reserves of perennial ryegrass. Journal of Range Management 33:200–203. 10.2307/3898284 DOI
Iwasa Y, Kubo T. 1997. Optimal size of storage for recovery after unpredictable disturbances. Evolutionary Ecology 11:41–65. 10.1023/A:1018483429029 DOI
Janeček Š, Klimešová J. 2014. Carbohydrate storage in meadow plants and its depletion after disturbance: do roots and stem-derived organs differ in their roles? Oecologia 175:51–61. 10.1007/s00442-014-2900-3 PubMed DOI
Janeček Š, Lepš J. 2005. Effect of litter, leaf cover and cover of basal internodes of the dominant species Molinia caerulea on seedling recruitment and established vegetation. Acta Oecologica 28:141–147. 10.1016/j.actao.2005.03.006 DOI
Janeček Š, Lanta V, Klimešová J, Doležal J. 2011. Effect of abandonment and plant classification on carbohydrate reserves of meadow plants. Plant Biology 13:243–251. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00352.x PubMed DOI
Klimeš L. 1995. Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bílé Karpaty Mts., Czech Republic). Folia Geobotanica 30:499–510. 10.1007/BF02803979 DOI
Klimeš L. 1999. Small-scale plant mobility in a species-rich grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:209–218. 10.2307/3237142 DOI
Klimeš L, Klimešová J. 2002. The effects of mowing and fertilization on carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of grasses: do they promote plant coexistence in species-rich meadows? Evolutionary Ecology 15:363–382. 10.1023/A:1016041100087 DOI
Klimeš L, Hájek M, Mudrák O, Dančák M, Preislerová Z, Hájková P, Jongepierová I, Klimešová J. 2013. Effects of changes in management on resistance and resilience in three grassland communities. Applied Vegetation Science 16:640–649. 10.1111/avsc.12032 DOI
Kobe RK. 1997. Carbohydrate allocation to storage as a basis of interspecific variation in sapling survivorship and growth. Oikos 80:226–233. 10.2307/3546590 DOI
Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E. 1982. Wurzelatlas Mitteleuropäischer Grünlandpflanzen. Band 1. Monocotyledoneae. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E. 1992. Wurzelatlas Mitteleuropäischer Grünlandpflanzen. Band 2. Pteridophyta und Dicotyledoneae (Magnoliopsida). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
Latzel V, Janeček Š, Hájek T, Klimešová J. 2014. Biomass and stored carbohydrate compensation after above-ground biomass removal in a perennial herb: does environmental productivity play a role? Folia Geobotanica 49:17–29. 10.1007/s12224-013-9162-4 DOI
Lepš J. 1999. Nutrient status, disturbance and competition: an experimental test of relationships in a wet meadow. Journal of Vegetation Science 10:219–230. 10.2307/3237143 DOI
Martínková J, Smilauer P, Mihulka S. 2002. Phenological pattern of grassland species: relation to the ecological and morphological traits. Flora 197:290–302. 10.1078/0367-2530-00043 DOI
Maurin O, Davies TJ, Burrows JE, Daru BH, Yessoufou K, Muasya AM, Van der Bank M, Bond WJ. 2014. Savanna fire and the origins of the ‘underground forests’ of Africa. New Phytologist 204:201–214. 10.1111/nph.12936 PubMed DOI
Menke JW, Trlica MJ. 1981. Carbohydrate reserve, phenology, and growth cycles of nine Colorado range species. Journal of Range Management 34:269–277. 10.2307/3897849 DOI
Mooney HA, Billings WD. 1960. The annual carbohydrate cycle of alpine plants as related to growth. American Journal of Botany 47:594–598. 10.2307/2439439 DOI
Moran CH, Sprague VG, Sullivan JT. 1953. Changes in the carbohydrate reserves of ladino white clover following defoliation. Plant Physiology 28:467–474. 10.1104/pp.28.3.467 PubMed DOI PMC
Morvan-Bertrand A, Pavis N, Boucaud J, Prud'homme MP. 1999. Partitioning of reserve and newly assimilated carbon in roots and leaf tissues of Lolium perenne during regrowth after defoliation: assessment by 13C steady-state labelling and carbohydrate analysis. Plant, Cell and Environment 22:1097–1108. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00485.x DOI
Poorter L, Kitajima K, Mercado P, Chubiña J, Melgar I, Prins HHT. 2010. Resprouting as a persistence strategy of tropical forest trees: relations with carbohydrate storage and shade tolerance. Ecology 91:2613–2627. 10.1890/09-0862.1 PubMed DOI
Schmitt A, Pausch J, Kuzyakov Y. 2013. Effect of clipping and shading on C allocation and fluxes in soil under ryegrass and alfalfa estimated by 14C labelling. Applied Soil Ecology 64:228–236. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.12.015 DOI
Schutz AEN, Bond WJ, Cramer MD. 2009. Juggling carbon: allocation patterns of a dominant tree in a fire-prone savanna. Oecologia 160:235–246. 10.1007/s00442-009-1293-1 PubMed DOI
Trlica MJ, Buwai M, Menke JW. 1977. Effects of rest following defoliations on the recovery of several range species. Journal of Range Management 30:21–27. 10.2307/3897327 DOI
Van der Maarel E, Sykes MT. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. Journal of Vegetation Science 4:179–188. 10.2307/3236103 DOI