Thiotepa-based high-dose therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a retrospective study from the EBMT
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
26569093
DOI
10.1038/bmt.2015.273
PII: bmt2015273
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Autografts MeSH
- Cytarabine administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Carmustine administration & dosage MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymphoma mortality therapy MeSH
- Melphalan administration & dosage MeSH
- Survival Rate MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Podophyllotoxin administration & dosage MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage MeSH
- Registries * MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Thiotepa administration & dosage MeSH
- Stem Cell Transplantation * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cytarabine MeSH
- Carmustine MeSH
- Melphalan MeSH
- Podophyllotoxin MeSH
- Thiotepa MeSH
Clinical information about thiotepa-based autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) outside the primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) field is sparse. In this registry-based retrospective study, we evaluated potential risks and benefits of thiotepa-based preparative regimens compared with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) in auto-SCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, excluding PCNSL), follicular lymphoma (FL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A total of 14 544 patients (589 thiotepa and 13 955 BEAM) met the eligibility criteria, and 535 thiotepa- and 1031 BEAM-treated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for final comparison. No significant differences between thiotepa and BEAM groups for any survival end point were identified in the whole sample or disease entity subsets. For a more detailed analysis, 47 TEAM (thiotepa, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)-treated patients were compared with 75 matched BEAM patients with additional collection of toxicity data. Again, there were no significant differences between the two groups for any survival end point. In addition, the frequency of common infectious and non-infectious complications including secondary malignancies was comparable between TEAM and BEAM. These results indicate that thiotepa-based high-dose therapy might be a valuable alternative to BEAM in DLBCL, HL and FL. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.
APHP Hopital Saint louis Hemato Oncology Paris Diderot University Sorbonne Paris Cité Paris France
Cardarelli Hospital Napoli Italy
Department of Hematology and Oncology Helios Hospital Erfurt Erfurt Germany
Department of Hematology Azienda Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia Cervello Palermo Italy
Department of Hematology Freiburg University Medical Center Freiburg Germany
Department of Hematology Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital Paris France
Department of Medicine 5 University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Hematologie Hospices Civils de Lyon and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Pierre Bénite France
Hematology Department Centre Leon Berard Lyon France
Hematology Department Paoli Calmettes Institute Marseille Aix Marseille University Marseille France
Hematology Unit Arcispedale S Maria Nuova IRCCS Reggio Emilia Italy
Hematology Unit Ospedale Civile Piacenza Italy
Hematology Unit S Maria delle Croci Hospital Ravenna Italy
Institut Català d'Oncologia Hospital Duran i Reynals Barcelona Spain
Lymphoma Working Party European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Paris France
See more in PubMed
Ann Oncol. 2007 Jan;18(1):149-57 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jan;33(1):19-24 PubMed
J Neurooncol. 2012 May;107(3):659-63 PubMed
Leuk Lymphoma. 2005 Oct;46(10):1441-8 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jul;44(2):89-96 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1540-5 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Feb;45(2):219-34 PubMed
Blood. 2011 Sep 22;118(12):3419-25 PubMed
Cancer Res. 1989 Feb 1;49(3):736-41 PubMed
Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 May;17 (5-6):427-33 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Feb;25(3):309-13 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2512-8 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Apr;45(4):801-2 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Nov;40(10):919-24 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 1997 Nov;3(5):261-6 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;47(2):311-2 PubMed
J Neurooncol. 2014 May;118(1):155-62 PubMed
Lancet. 2002 Jun 15;359(9323):2065-71 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):1046-53 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Aug;32(3):279-85 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3865-70 PubMed
Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Oct;49(10):1899-906 PubMed
Blood. 2014 Nov 6;124(19):3029-31 PubMed
Hematology. 2012 Jan;17(1):23-7 PubMed
Leuk Lymphoma. 2004 Nov;45(11):2253-9 PubMed
Haematologica. 2013 May;98(5):765-70 PubMed
Haematologica. 2013 Mar;98(3):364-70 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jan;43(1):37-42 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Nov;34(9):781-6 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Jul;12(7):770-7 PubMed