Autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: efficacy in the rituximab era and comparison to first allogeneic transplants. A report from the EBMT Lymphoma Working Party
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
26618550
DOI
10.1038/bmt.2015.286
PII: bmt2015286
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- autologní štěp MeSH
- difúzní velkobuněčný B-lymfom mortalita terapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- rituximab aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transplantace kmenových buněk * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- rituximab MeSH
In the era of chemoimmunotherapy, the optimal treatment paradigm for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has been challenged. We reviewed the outcome of standard salvage therapy with an autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT) over the last two decades and the outcome of allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) in the most recent decade. AutoSCT recipients diagnosed between 1992 and 2002 (n=2737) were compared with those diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 (n=3980). Patients diagnosed after 2002 had a significantly lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse incidence (RI) and a superior PFS and overall survival (OS). A total of 4210 patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010 underwent either an autoSCT or an alloSCT as their first transplant procedure. Two-hundred and thirty patients received an alloSCT (myeloablative (MACalloSCT) n=132, reduced intensity (RICalloSCT) n=98). The 4-year NRM rates were 7%, 20% and 27% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year RI was 45%, 40% and 38% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively (NS). The 4-year PFS were 48%, 52% and 35% for autoSCT, RICalloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. The 4-year OS was 60%, 52% and 38% for autoSCT, RIC alloSCT and MACalloSCT, respectively. After adjustment for confounding factors NRM was significantly worse for patients undergoing alloSCT whilst there was no difference in the RI.
APHP Hemato Oncology Department Saint Louis Hospital Paris France
Department d'Hematologie Clinique CHU Lapeyronie Montpellier France
Department of BMT Hadassah University Hospital Jerusalem Israël
Department of Haematology Antwerp University Hospital Antwerp Edegem Belgium
Department of Haematology Centre Leon Berard Lyon France
Department of Haematology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Department of Haematology Cliniques Universitaires St Luc Brussels Belgium
Department of Haematology Hospices Civils de Lyon Pierre Benite France
Department of Haematology Nouvel Hopital Civil Strasbourg France
Department of Haematology Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham UK
Department of Haematology University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK
Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital Maastricht Maastricht The Netherlands
Department of Medicine Charles University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Medicine University of Freiburg Germany
Lymphoma Working Party EBMT Paris France
Medizinische Klinik University Of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Program de Transplantation and Therapie Cellulaire Institut Paoli Calmettes Marseille France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan;16(1):78-85 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):426-32 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1342-8 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007 Apr;13(4):486-92 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3744-53 PubMed
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):757-66 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 7;333(23):1540-5 PubMed
Blood. 2003 Jul 1;102(1):53-9 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 1999 Oct;107(1):154-61 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5027-33 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4462-9 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 May;18(5):788-93 PubMed
Blood. 2007 Dec 15;110(13):4606-13 PubMed
Clin Lymphoma. 2000 Jun;1(1):46-54 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Nov;20(11):1729-36 PubMed
Blood. 2003 Sep 15;102(6):1989-96 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 2005 Oct;131(2):223-30 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 15;19(2):406-13 PubMed
Br J Haematol. 2008 Nov;143(3):395-403 PubMed
Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4310-6 PubMed
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004 Jul;75(1):45-9 PubMed
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jan;16(1):35-45 PubMed
Blood. 1994 Aug 15;84(4):1050-5 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Apr;31(8):667-78 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42 PubMed
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000 Oct;26(8):859-64 PubMed
Lancet Oncol. 2006 May;7(5):379-91 PubMed
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3490-6 PubMed