The Czechoslovakian Wolfdog is a unique dog breed that originated from hybridization between German Shepherds and wild Carpathian wolves in the 1950s as a military experiment. This breed was used for guarding the Czechoslovakian borders during the cold war and is currently kept by civilian breeders all round the world. The aim of our study was to characterize, for the first time, the genetic composition of this breed in relation to its known source populations. We sequenced the hypervariable part of the mtDNA control region and genotyped the Amelogenin gene, four sex-linked microsatellites and 39 autosomal microsatellites in 79 Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs, 20 German Shepherds and 28 Carpathian wolves. We performed a range of population genetic analyses based on both empirical and simulated data. Only two mtDNA and two Y-linked haplotypes were found in Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs. Both mtDNA haplotypes were of domestic origin, while only one of the Y-haplotypes was shared with German Shepherds and the other was unique to Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs. The observed inbreeding coefficient was low despite the small effective population size of the breed, possibly due to heterozygote advantages determined by introgression of wolf alleles. Moreover, Czechoslovakian Wolfdog genotypes were distinct from both parental populations, indicating the role of founder effect, drift and/or genetic hitchhiking. The results revealed the peculiar genetic composition of the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog, showing a limited introgression of wolf alleles within a higher proportion of the dog genome, consistent with the reiterated backcrossing used in the pedigree. Artificial selection aiming to keep wolf-like phenotypes but dog-like behavior resulted in a distinctive genetic composition of Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs, which provides a unique example to study the interactions between dog and wolf genomes.

Department 18 Section of Environmental Engineering Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

Department of Biology and Ecology Ostrava University Ostrava Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Prague Czech Republic

Friends of the Earth Czech Republic Olomouc branch Olomouc Czech Republic

Institute of Forest Ecology Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic

Laboratorio di Genetica Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e Ricerca Ambientale Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt M-L, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, et al. (2013) The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495: 360–364. 10.1038/nature11837 PubMed DOI

Freedman AH, Gronau I, Schweizer RM, Ortega-Del Vecchyo D, Han E, et al. (2014) Genome Sequencing Highlights the Dynamic Early History of Dogs. Plos Genetics 10. PubMed PMC

Skoglund P, Ersmark E, Palkopoulou E, Dalén L. (2015) Ancient Wolf Genome Reveals an Early Divergence of Domestic Dog Ancestors and Admixture into High-Latitude Breeds. Current Biology 25: 1515–1519. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.019 PubMed DOI

Randi E, Hulva P, Fabbri E, Galaverni M, Galov A, Kusak J, et al. (2014) Multilocus Detection of Wolf x Dog Hybridization in Italy, and Guidelines for Marker Selection. Plos One 9: 13. PubMed PMC

Anderson TM, vonHoldt BM, Candille SI, Musiani M, Greco C, Stahler DR, et al. (2009) Molecular and Evolutionary History of Melanism in North American Gray Wolves. Science 323: 1339–1343. 10.1126/science.1165448 PubMed DOI PMC

Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 613–622.

De Lavigne G (2015) Free Ranging Dogs—Stray, Feral or Wild. Raleigh, North Carolina: Lulu.com; pp. 447.

Hartl K, Jedlička J (2002) Českoslovensý vlčák. Brno, Česká republika: LOBA; 1–60 p.

Bigi D, Marelli SP, Randi E, Polli M (2015) Genetic characterization of four native Italian shepherd dog breeds and analysis of their relationship to cosmopolitan dog breeds using microsatellite markers. animal FirstView: 1–8. PubMed

Leroy G, Verrier E, Meriaux JC, Rognon X (2009) Genetic diversity of dog breeds: between-breed diversity, breed assignation and conservation approaches. Animal Genetics 40: 333–343. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01843.x PubMed DOI

Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Galaverni M, Milanesi P, Randi E (2014) Noninvasive sampling and genetic variability, pack structure, and dynamics in an expanding wolf population. Journal of Mammalogy 95: 41–59.

Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538.

Vilà C, Amorim IR, Leonard JA, Posada D, Castroviejo J, Petrucci-Fonseca F, et al. (1999) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography and population history of the grey wolf Canis lupus. Molecular Ecology 8: 2089–2103. PubMed

Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL-W—Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680. PubMed PMC

Haal TA (1994) BioEdit: a user—friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series: 95–98.

Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 PubMed DOI

Goudet J (2001) FSTAT: A Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices, Version 2.9.3. Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Peakall R, Smouse P (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. PubMed PMC

Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP ' 007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 103–106. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x PubMed DOI

Belkihr K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2004) Logiciel sous Windows (tm) pour la Génétique des Populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions: CNRS UMR. 5000. Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier.

Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567–1587. PubMed PMC

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959. PubMed PMC

Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4: 359–361.

Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620. PubMed

Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 137–138.

Waples RS, Do CHI (2008) ldne: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 753–756. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x PubMed DOI

Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator v2: re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 209–214. 10.1111/1755-0998.12157 PubMed DOI

Waples RS, Do C (2010) Linkage disequilibrium estimates of contemporary Ne using highly variable genetic markers: a largely untapped resource for applied conservation and evolution. Evolutionary Applications 3: 244–262. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00104.x PubMed DOI PMC

Kuo CH, Janzen FJ (2003) bottlesim: a bottleneck simulation program for long-lived species with overlapping generations. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 669–673.

Čílová D, Vejl P, Šebková N, Častková M, Jurkovičová P, Kadlecová V (2011) Microsatellite analysis of X and Y gonosome variability in the Czechoslovakian and Saarloos wolfdog breeds. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 6: 60–61.

Clarke B, Grant PR (1996) Evolution on islands. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 351: 723–854.

Wilbe M, Jokinen P, Truvé K, Seppala EH, Karlsson EK, Biagi T, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association mapping identifies multiple loci for a canine SLE-related disease complex. Nature genetics 42: 250–254. 10.1038/ng.525 PubMed DOI

Voorbij AMWY, Leegwater PA, Kooistra HS (2014) Pituitary Dwarfism in Saarloos and Czechoslovakian Wolfdogs is Associated with a Mutation in LHX3. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 28: 1770–1774. 10.1111/jvim.12448 PubMed DOI PMC

Zeng R, Coates JR, Johnson GC, Hansen L, Awano T, Kolicheski A, et al. (2014) Breed Distribution of SOD1 Alleles Previously Associated with Canine Degenerative Myelopathy. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 28: 515–521. 10.1111/jvim.12317 PubMed DOI PMC

Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the 6th international congress of genetics 1: 356–366.

Glémin S (2003) How Are Deleterious Mutations Purged? Drift versus Nonrandom Mating. Evolution 57: 2678–2687. PubMed

Huson HJ, Parker HG, Runstadler J, Ostrander EA (2010) A genetic dissection of breed composition and performance enhancement in the Alaskan sled dog. BMC Genetics 11. PubMed PMC

Hoban S (2014) An overview of the utility of population simulation software in molecular ecology. Molecular Ecology 23: 2383–2401. 10.1111/mec.12741 PubMed DOI

Hundertmark K, Van Daele L (2010) Founder effect and bottleneck signatures in an introduced, insular population of elk. Conservation Genetics 11: 139–147.

Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372. PubMed

Barton NH (2000) Genetic hitchhiking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 355: 1553–1562. PubMed PMC

Cieslak M, Reissmann M, Hofreiter M, Ludwig A (2011) Colours of domestication. Biological Reviews 86: 885–899. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00177.x PubMed DOI

Belyaev DK (1979) Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity 70: 301–308. PubMed

Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A Simple Reason for a Big Difference: Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do. Current Biology 13: 763–766. PubMed

Nagasawa M, Mitsui S, En S, Ohtani N, Ohta M, Sakuma Y, et al. (2015) Oxytocin-Gaze Positive Loop and the Coevolution of Human-Dog Bonds. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 70: 450–451. PubMed

Genomic Rewilding of Domestic Animals: The Role of Hybridization and Selection in Wolfdog Breeds

Czechoslovakian Wolfdog Genomic Divergence from Its Ancestors Canis lupus, German Shepherd Dog, and Different Sheepdogs of European Origin

Tracing genetic resurrection of pointing dog breeds: Cesky Fousek as both survivor and rescuer

Wolf outside, dog inside? The genomic make-up of the Czechoslovakian Wolfdog