The clinical phenomenology and associations of trick maneuvers in cervical dystonia

. 2016 Mar ; 123 (3) : 269-75. [epub] 20151208

Jazyk angličtina Země Rakousko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26645376
Odkazy

PubMed 26645376
DOI 10.1007/s00702-015-1488-z
PII: 10.1007/s00702-015-1488-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Sensory trick is an unusual clinical feature in cervical dystonia that attenuates disease symptoms by slight touch to a specific area of the face or head. Using a semi-quantitative questionnaire-based study of 197 patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia, we sought to determine probable pathophysiologic correlates, with the wider aim of examining its eventual clinical significance. The typical sensory trick, i.e., light touch, not necessitating the use of force leading to simple overpowering of dystonic activity, was present in 83 (42.1 %) patients. The vast majority of the patients required a specific sequence of sensorimotor inputs, including touch sensation on the face or different areas of the head, and also sensory and motor input of the hand itself. Deviations often led to a significant decrease in effectiveness and lack of expected benefit. Moreover, patients able to perform the maneuver reported compellingly higher subjective effect of botulinum toxin treatment (median 7 vs. 5 on a scale of 0-10; p < 0.0001) and lower depression score (median 10 vs. 14 on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating scale; p < 0.001). Overall, the results point to marked disruption of sensorimotor networks in cervical dystonia. The mechanism of the sensory trick action may be associated with balancing the abnormal activation patterns by specific sensorimotor inputs. Its presence may be considered a positive predictive factor for responsiveness to botulinum toxin treatment.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Curr Opin Neurol. 2009 Aug;22(4):406-13 PubMed

Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;124(7):1269-76 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2004 Apr;19(4):452-8 PubMed

J Neurol. 2001 Jun;248(6):478-82 PubMed

Exp Neurol. 2007 Apr;204(2):845-8 PubMed

J Neurol. 2001 Dec;248(12):1073-8 PubMed

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 Mar;120(3):487-96 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2010 Mar 15;25(4):407-12 PubMed

Neurol Clin. 1984 Aug;2(3):541-54 PubMed

Toxins (Basel). 2013 Feb 04;5(2):249-66 PubMed

Cereb Cortex. 2008 Dec;18(12):2775-88 PubMed

Neurosci Lett. 1998 Jul 24;251(2):125-8 PubMed

Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jan;13(1):100-12 PubMed

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;85(9):987-93 PubMed

Eur J Neurol. 2011 Jan;18(1):5-18 PubMed

Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 1995 Aug;38(2):155-62 PubMed

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;68(2):227-9 PubMed

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2007 Oct;13(7):417-20 PubMed

Brain. 1985 Jun;108 ( Pt 2):463-83 PubMed

Mov Disord. 1999 Nov;14(6):994-9 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 2000 Mar;47(3):322-8 PubMed

Neural Plast. 2013;2013:908741 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2005 Mar;20(3):388 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2011 Jun;26(7):1185-6 PubMed

Mov Disord. 1996 Mar;11(2):225-7 PubMed

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;85(8):882-4 PubMed

J Clin Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;45(12):519-21 PubMed

Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1629-33 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2006 Jun;21(6):754-60 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2004 Mar;19(3):331-2 PubMed

J Neurol. 2012 Aug;259(8):1580-4 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2009 Jul 30;24(10):1427-36 PubMed

Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;115(7):1624-30 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2004 Mar;19 Suppl 8:S60-4 PubMed

J Neurol. 2003 Jan;250(1):42-50 PubMed

Mov Disord. 1998 May;13(3):549-51 PubMed

J Neurol Sci. 2011 Jul 15;306(1-2):71-5 PubMed

Adv Neurol. 1998;78:1-10 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...