Ecological differentiation of diploid and polyploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus sensu lato (Asteraceae) is stronger in areas of sympatry
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26658487
PubMed Central
PMC4724049
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcv176
PII: mcv176
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Senecio carniolicus s.l., autopolyploidy, biodiversity, coexistence, contact zones, ecological differentiation, range-wide niche displacement, speciation.,
- MeSH
- diploidie MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- ekotyp MeSH
- metoda Monte Carlo MeSH
- modely genetické MeSH
- polyploidie * MeSH
- Senecio genetika fyziologie MeSH
- sympatrie * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ecological differentiation is recognized as an important factor for polyploid speciation, but little is known regarding whether the ecological niches of cytotypes differ between areas of sympatry and areas where single cytotypes occur (i.e. niche displacement). METHODS: Ecological niches of four groups of Senecio carniolicus sensu lato (s.l.) (western and eastern diploid lineages, tetraploids and hexaploids) were characterized via Landolt indicator values of the accompanying vascular plant species and tested using multivariate and univariate statistics. KEY RESULTS: The four groups of S. carniolicus s.l. were ecologically differentiated mainly with respect to temperature, light and soil (humus content, nutrients, moisture variability). Niche breadths did not differ significantly. In areas of sympatry hexaploids shifted towards sites with higher temperature, less light and higher soil humus content as compared with homoploid sites, whereas diploids and tetraploids shifted in the opposite direction. In heteroploid sites of tetraploids and the western diploid lineage the latter shifted towards sites with lower humus content but higher aeration. CONCLUSIONS: Niche displacement can facilitate the formation of stable contact zones upon secondary contact of polyploids and their lower-ploid ancestors and/or lead to convergence of the cytotypes' niches after they have attained non-overlapping ranges. Niche displacement is essential for understanding ecological consequences of polyploidy.
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna Rennweg 14 A 1030 Vienna Austria
Institute of Botany University of Innsbruck Sternwartestrasse 15 A 6020 Innsbruck Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Arthur W. 1982. The evolutionary consequences of interspecific competition. Advances in Ecological Research 12: 127–187.
Baack EJ. 2005. To succeed globally, disperse locally: effects of local pollen and seed dispersal on tetraploid establishment. Heredity 94: 538–546. PubMed
Balao F, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2011. Phenotypic consequences of polyploidy and genome size at the microevolutionary scale: a multivariate morphological approach. New Phytologist 192: 256–265. PubMed
Beans CM. 2014. The case for character displacement in plants. Ecology and Evolution 4: 862–875. PubMed PMC
Bennett MD. 1971. The duration of meiosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 178: 277–299. PubMed
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, et al. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 127–135. PubMed
Cooley JR. 2007. Decoding asymmetries in reproductive character displacement. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 156: 89–96.
Dayan T, Simberloff D. 2005. Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecology Letters 8: 875–894.
Diekmann M. 2003. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review. Basic and Applied Ecology 4: 493–506.
Dray S, Dufour AB. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22: 1–20.
Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Krahulec F. 2010. Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of PubMed PMC
Dullinger S, Hülber K. 2011. Experimental evaluation of seed limitation in Alpine snowbed plants. PLoS ONE 6: e21537. PubMed PMC
Escobar García P, Winkler M, Flatscher R, et al. 2012. Extensive range persistence in peripheral and interior refugia characterizes Pleistocene range dynamics in a widespread Alpine plant species ( PubMed PMC
Felber-Girard M, Felber F, Buttler A. 1996. Habitat differentiation in a narrow hybrid zone between diploid and tetraploid
Flatscher R, Escobar García P, Hülber K, et al. 2015. Underestimated diversity in one of the world’s best studied mountain ranges: the polyploid complex of PubMed PMC
Fowler NL, Levin DA. 1984. Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. American Naturalist 124: 703–711.
Glennon KL, Ritchie ME, Segraves KA. 2014. Evidence for shared broad-scale climatic niches of diploid and polyploid plants. Ecology Letters 17: 574–582. PubMed
Grace JB, Wetzel RG. 1981. Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (
Grant PR. 1975. The classical case of character displacement. Evolutionary Biology 8: 875–894.
Hülber K, Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, et al. 2009. Ecological segregation drives fine-scale cytotype distribution of PubMed PMC
Hülber K, Sonnleitner M, Suda J, et al. 2015. Ecological differentiation, lack of hybrids involving diploids, and asymmetric gene flow between polyploids in narrow contact zones of PubMed PMC
Johnson MTJ, Husband BC, Burton TL. 2003. Habitat differentiation between diploid and tetraploid
Laird NM, Ware JH. 1982. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38: 963–974. PubMed
Landolt E. 1977. Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora. Veröffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH, Stiftung Rübel 64: 1–208.
Landolt E, Bäumler B, Erhardt A, et al. 2010. Flora Indicativa: ecological indicator values and biological attributes of the Flora of Switzerland and the Alps
Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. American Naturalist 122: 1–25.
Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution
Levin DA. 2003. The ecological transition in speciation. New Phytologist 161: 91–96.
Lumaret R, Guillerm JL, Delay J, Loutfi AAL, Izco J, Jay M. 1987. Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in PubMed
McIntyre PJ. 2012. Polyploidy associated with altered and broader ecological niches in the PubMed
Oswald BP, Nuismer SL. 2011. A unified model of autopolyploid establishment and evolution. The American Naturalist 178: 687–700. PubMed PMC
Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401–437. PubMed
Palmer MW. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of Canonical Correspondence Analysis. Ecology 74: 2215–2230.
Parisod C, Holderegger R, Brochmann C. 2010. Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytologist 186: 5–17. PubMed
Peers MJL, Thornton DH, Murray DL. 2013. Evidence for large-scale effects of competition: niche displacement in Canada lynx and bobcat. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 280: 20132495. PubMed PMC
Petit C, Bretagnolle F, Felber F. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploid–polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 306–311. PubMed
Pfennig KS, Pfennig DW. 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Quarterly Review of Biology 84: 253–276. PubMed PMC
Ramsey J, Ramsey TS. 2014. Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130352. PubMed PMC
Schönswetter P, Lachmayer M, Lettner C, et al. 2007. Sympatric diploid and hexaploid cytotypes of PubMed
Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, Escobar García P, et al. 2010. Distribution and habitat segregation on different spatial scales among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes of PubMed PMC
Sonnleitner M, Weis B, Flatscher R, et al. 2013. Parental ploidy strongly affects offspring fitness in heteroploid crosses among three cytotypes of autopolyploid PubMed PMC
Ståhlberg D, Hedrén M. 2009. Habitat differentiation, hybridization and gene flow patterns in mixed populations of diploid and autotetraploid
Suda J, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Tribsch A, Schneeweiss GM, Trávníček P, Schönswetter P. 2007. Complex distribution patterns of di-, tetra-, and hexaploid cytotypes in the European high mountain plant PubMed
te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, et al. 2011. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109: 19–45. PubMed PMC
ter Braak CJF. 1986. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.
Thompson JD, Lumaret R. 1992. The evolutionary dynamics of polyploid plants – origins, establishment and persistence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7: 302–307. PubMed
Thompson KA, Husband BC, Maherali H. 2014. Climatic niche differences between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of PubMed
Treier UA, Broennimann O, Normand S, et al. 2009. Shift in cytotype frequency and niche space in the invasive plant PubMed
Van Dijk P, Bijlsma R. 1994. Simulations of flowering time displacement between two cytotypes that form inviable hybrids. Heredity 72: 522–535.
Van Dijk P, Hartog M, Van Delden W. 1992. Single cytotype areas in autopolyploid
Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang TS, Schneeweiss GM. 2013. Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 140: 137–150. PubMed PMC
Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 13875–13879. PubMed PMC
Whole-genome duplication leads to significant but inconsistent changes in climatic niche
Role of ploidy in colonization of alpine habitats in natural populations of Arabidopsis arenosa