Women who are regularly cycling exhibit different partner preferences than those who use hormonal contraception. Preliminary evidence appears to suggest that during pregnancy women's partner preferences also diverge from those prevalent while regularly cycling. This is consistent with the general assertion that women's mate preferences are impacted by hormonal variation. During pregnancy, women's preferences are thought to closely resemble those displayed by women who are using hormonal contraception. Here, based on this literature, we compared levels of sexual desire among pregnant women who met their partner while using hormonal contraception and pregnant women who met their partner while regularly cycling. We predicted that women who met their partner while using hormonal contraception would experience higher levels of in-pair sexual desire during pregnancy since these women will have partner preferences that more closely match those prevalent at the time of their partner choice. Our results provided support for the idea that previous contraceptive use/non-use may impact subsequent sexual desire for the partner during pregnancy. Pregnant women who met their partner while using hormonal contraception (N = 37) were shown to have higher levels of in-pair sexual desire than those who met while regularly cycling (N = 47). In contrast, levels of extra-pair desire were not related to previous use/non-use of hormonal contraception. These findings were robust when controlling for a number of relevant individual difference variables known to impact sexual desire. Our results contribute to our understanding of factors affecting relationship functioning during pregnancy.

Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa ON K1H 8L6 Canada

Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

School of Natural Sciences University of Stirling Stirling Scotland UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alvergne A, Lummaa V. Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2010;25:171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003. PubMed DOI

Babazadeh R, Najmabadi KM, Mirzaii K, Masomi Z. Changes in sexual desire and activity during pregnancy among women in Shahroud, Iran. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2013;120:82–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.021. PubMed DOI

Boothroyd LG, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences. 2007;43:1161–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.008. DOI

Burrows LJ, Basha M, Goldstein AT. The effects of hormonal contraceptives on female sexuality: A review. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;9:2213–2223. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02848.x. PubMed DOI

Cobey KD, Buunk AP. Conducting high-quality research on the psychological impact of oral contraceptive use. Contraception. 2012;86:330–331. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.011. PubMed DOI

Cobey KD, Pollet TV, Roberts SC, Buunk AP. Hormonal birth control use and relationship jealousy: Evidence for estrogen dosage effects. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;50:315–317. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.012. DOI

Cobey KD, Roberts SC, Buunk AP. Hormonal contraceptive congruency: Implications for relationship jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;55:569–573. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.031. DOI

DeLamater JD, Sill M. Sexual desire in later life. Journal of Sex Research. 2005;42:138–149. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552267. PubMed DOI

Güleroğlu T, Beşer G. Evaluation of sexual functions of the pregnant women. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11:146–153. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12347. PubMed DOI

Hällström T, Samuelsson S. Changes in women’s sexual desire in middle life: The longitudinal study of women in Gothenburg. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1991;28:443–456. PubMed

Havlíček J, Cobey KD, Barrett L, Klapilová K, Roberts SC. The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm. Behavioral Ecology. 2015;26:1249–1260. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv064. DOI

Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Perrett DI, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Law Smith MJ. Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2008;37:78–84. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y. PubMed DOI

Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., … Moore, F. R. (2005). Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 272, 347–354. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2962. PubMed PMC

Little AC, Burriss RP, Petrie M, Jones BC, Roberts SC. Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:1777–1785. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.014. PubMed DOI

Pastor Z, Holla K, Chmel R. The influence of combined oral contraceptives on female sexual desire: A systematic review. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. 2013;18:27–43. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.728643. PubMed DOI

Pauls RN, Occhino JA, Dryfhout VL. Effects of pregnancy on female sexual function and body image: A prospective study. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008;5:1915–1922. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00884.x. PubMed DOI

Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999;399:741–742. doi: 10.1038/21557. PubMed DOI

Puts DA. Cyclic variation in women’s preferences for masculine traits: Potential hormonal causes. Human Nature. 2006;17:114–127. doi: 10.1007/s12110-006-1023-x. PubMed DOI

Roberts SC, Cobey KD, Klapilová K, Havlíček J. An evolutionary approach offers a fresh perspective on the relationship between oral contraception and sexual desire. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2013;42:1369–1375. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0126-9. PubMed DOI

Roberts SC, Cobey KD, Klapilová K, Havlíček J. Oral contraceptives and sexual desire: Replies to Graham and Bancroft (2013) and Puts and Pope (2013) [Letter to the Editor] Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014;43:3–6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0236-4. PubMed DOI

Roberts SC, Gosling LM, Carter V, Petrie M. MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2008;275:2715–2722. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0825. PubMed DOI PMC

Roberts, S. C., Klapilová, K., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., … Havlíček, J. (2012). Relationship satisfaction and outcome in women who meet their partner while using oral contraception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 279, 1430–1436. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1647. PubMed PMC

Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Cobey, K. D., Klapilova, K., Havliček, J., … Petrie, M. (2014b). Partner choice, relationship satisfaction, and oral contraception: The congruency hypothesis. Psychological Science, 25, 1497–1503. doi:10.1177/0956797614532295. PubMed

Sagiv-Reiss DM, Birnbaum GE, Safir MP. Changes in sexual experiences and relationship quality during pregnancy. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2012;41:1241–5121. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9839-9. PubMed DOI

Serati, M., Salvatore, S., Siesto, G., Cattoni, E., Zanirato, M., Khullar, V., … Bolis, P. (2010). Female sexual function during pregnancy and after childbirth. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7, 2782–2790. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01893.x. PubMed

Stonehouse JM, Forrester GJ. Robustness of the t and U tests under combined assumption violations. Journal of Applied Statistics. 1998;25:63–74. doi: 10.1080/02664769823304. DOI

Subrahmaniam K, Subrahmaniam K, Messeri JY. On the robustness of some tests of significance in sampling from a compound normal population. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1975;70:435–438. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10479885. DOI

von Sydow K. Sexuality during pregnancy and after childbirth: A metacontent analysis of 59 studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1999;47:27–49. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(98)00106-8. PubMed DOI